Bronchoscopic Tissue Removal Device - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 29
About This Presentation
Title:

Bronchoscopic Tissue Removal Device

Description:

Handle will press-fit to the PEEK catheter tubing ... 1800 X 3 = $5400 for setup/run/cleanup of each PEEK extruded part (3 parts total) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:29
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 30
Provided by: sang71
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Bronchoscopic Tissue Removal Device


1
Bronchoscopic Tissue Removal Device
  • Group 7
  • Sangita Sudharshan
  • Nathan Killian
  • David Jin
  • Mentor Dr. Martin L Mayse

2
Overview of Need
  • Lung cancer is the primary cause of airway
    obstructions
  • 175,000 new cases
  • Current methods have several problems

3
Current Methods
4
Design Requirements
  • Be used in a flexible bronchoscope
  • Minimize collateral damage
  • Control bleeding
  • Have an immediate effect
  • Recover specimens
  • Have a durable effect (gt 1 month)
  • Cost less than 1,000 to make

5
Design Specification
  • Flexibility is primary consideration
  • Diameter
  • Less than 2.2 mm ideal for 5 mm scope
  • 2.2 2.8 maximum for 6 mm scope
  • Length
  • At least 60 cm working length
  • Suction
  • Must be less than or equal to 300 mmHg (max wall
    suction used in hospitals)
  • Materials
  • Biocompatible (e.g. stainless steel, silicone
    plastic, ABS plastic)

6
Mechanical Debulking
  • Advantages
  • Fine control over amount/location of tissue
    removed
  • Quick relief of airway obstruction
  • Tissue sample can be removed
  • Disadvantages
  • Poor hemostasis
  • Short durability
  • Surgery is long and tedious
  • Solution Automatic Debulking

7
Overview of Chosen Design
Not shown Handle and pumps
Catheter Tubing
Blade
Pin
Hull
8
Mathematical Calculations for Design
Specifications
  • Pelton wheels normally work at 60-90 efficiency-
    one of the most efficient turbines
  • Striving for optimal efficiency, we found that
    this was achieved when using a saline jet
    diameter of 0.2mm, and fluid flow of

9
Mathematical Calculations for Design
Specifications
10
Mathematical Calculations for Design
Specifications
  • Solving for torque
  • Net efficiency with this torque

11
Mathematical Calculations for Design
Specifications
  • Rotations per minute
  • Power Output per rotation

12
Components of Chosen Design
PEEK tubingstainless-steel nozzle
Stainless-steel Hull
13
Components of Chosen Design
Suction Trap connected to Handle
Pelton Wheel Blades
14
Material
  • Hull, Wheel, Nozzle, and Handle
  • Stainless steel 440C
  • Biocompatible
  • Used in many surgical instruments as well as in
    knives
  • Easily machinable
  • Pin
  • Bronze
  • Soft to compliment the hard stainless-steel to
    decrease frictional forces

15
Material
  • Tubing for suction and saline solution transport
  • PEEK(commercial grade)
  • Biocompatible, flexible, strong
  • Easily extrudable
  • Density of 1300 kg/m3
  • High tensile strength (good for press-fitting) of
  • st 90MPa

16
Material
  • Pump
  • High-Pressure Peristaltic Pump-1045
  • Isolates saline solution from pumping mechanism
    to maintain sterility
  • Produces pressures up to 100psi
  • Produces flow rates of 7x10-6 m3/s
  • Standard Wall Suction-provided

High-Pressure pump system 970-1500
17
Manufacture
  • PEEK catheter tubing will be customized using
    extrusion to allow for separate saline and
    suction tubes
  • Dimensions
  • Length1m
  • Saline channel diameter 0.6mm
  • Suction channel diameter 1.8mm (horseshoe shape)
  • Weight 0.0031 lb
  • Cost
  • Setup, run, cleanup 1800
  • Tooling 568 one time fee
  • Material 48/lb 0.0031 lb0.15/tube
  • Lead time 2-3 weeks
  • (quote from Precision Extrusion)

18
Manufacture
  • PEEK external tubing will be customized using
    extrusion
  • Dimensions
  • Length 20cm
  • Outer Diameter 3.175mm (saline), 9.525mm
    (suction)
  • Wall thickness of 0.2mm
  • Weight 0.000185 lb (saline), 0.000566 lb
    (suction)
  • Cost
  • Setup, run, cleanup 1800
  • Material 48/lb0.000185 lb0.009/tube (saline)
  • 48/lb0.000566 lb0.027/tube (suction)
  • Lead time 2-3 weeks
  • (quote from Precision
    Extrusion)

19
Manufacture
  • The stainless-steel hull, nozzle, Pelton wheel,
    handle, and bronze pin will be machined using CNC
    (Computer Numerical Control) to allow for precise
    machining with very close tolerances
  • Hull Dimensions
  • overlap with PEEK 0.5cm length, 1.8mm OD, 0.1mm
    thickness
  • Window section 2mm OD, 0.2mm thickness
  • Nozzle Dimensions
  • 45 degree angle
  • 0.2mm end diameter
  • Wheel Dimensions
  • 1.5mm diameter
  • Buckets0.5mm diameter total
  • Handle Dimensions
  • 10cm long
  • Holes on external side 1/8 and 3/8
  • Hole on catheter side same as catheter tubing
    dimensions
  • Stainless Steel Cost 300 (setup/cleanup),
    0.50 per piece
  • Lead Time 2-3 weeks

  • (estimates from Ohio Laser and Shaw
    Stainless)

20
Manufacture
  • Pin Dimensions
  • Cylinder 2mm long
  • 0.2mm diameter
  • Bronze Pin Cost 1.00 per piece
  • Lead Time 2-3 weeks

(estimates from Ohio Laser and Shaw Stainless)
21
Connectors
  • Peristaltic pump will connect to plastic tubing
    through 1/8 male Luerlock connector
  • Provides tight connection without fluid leakage
  • Off the shelf lead time is only shipping time
  • Price 12.45 from smallparts.com
  • Suction pump will connect to plastic tubing
    through 3/8 barbed connector with thread of ¼
    NPT
  • This is the standard connector for hospital wall
    suction
  • Off the shelf lead time is only shipping time
  • Price 1.99 from manuf. Sierra

22
Manufacture Process
  • Stainless-steel handle will press-fit to plastic
    tubing
  • Handle will press-fit to the PEEK catheter tubing
  • Stainless-steel hull and nozzle will press-fit to
    the PEEK catheter tubing
  • The wheel will be placed through the suction
    channel and will be held in place with the bronze
    pin
  • Bronze pin will fit into drilled hole at the hull
    and will be secured using sealant fit for
    stainless-steel

23
Total Cost per Unit
  • Maximum of 150 units manufactured/day
  • Initial costs
  • 1800 X 3 5400 for setup/run/cleanup of each
    PEEK extruded part (3 parts total)
  • 568 for PEEK extrusion tooling
  • 300 for setup/run/cleanup of metal machining
  • Costs per unit
  • (0.15 0.009 0.027) X 150 units 28 for
    PEEK parts
  • 0.50 X four steel parts/unit X 150 units 300
    for steel parts
  • 1.00 X 150 units 150 for bronze pins
  • (12.45 1.99) X 150 units 2166 for
    connectors
  • Total cost for 150 units 8912
  • Cost per unit 60

24
Safety Analysis
  • DesignSafe output
  • Our greatests risks were cutting/shearing/puncturi
    ng tissue and loss of control
  • Most possible hazards were eliminated through
    design modifications by adding stainless-steel
    hull to protect wheel from exposure to unwanted
    tissue, and making sure the device was
    light-weight
  • Other hazards will be eliminated through
    on-the-job training and physician experience with
    the device

25
Satisfies Requirements?
  • Minimize collateral damage has only small window
    for blade to shear tissue allowing localization
  • Have an immediate effect shearing removes tissue
    immediately
  • Time efficient rpmgt600,000 will allow for rapid
    tissue removal
  • Control bleeding-shearing at high rpm activates
    more platelets to clot blood
  • Recover specimens suctionsaline solution carry
    sheared tissue to suction trap
  • Have a durable effect (gt 1 month) more precise
    shearing
  • Inexpensive Unit cost 60.00

26
Satisfies Specifications?
  • Flexible?
  • Diameter less than 2.2mm?
  • Length at least 60 cm working length?
  • Suction 300 mmHg (max wall suction used in
    hospitals)?
  • Materials biocompatible?
  • Force sufficient to shear tissue?

27
IP?
  • Our device could be patentable
  • We use a novel idea of designing a surgical
    instrument that utilizes saline solution as the
    actuating mechanism, as a lubricant, and as a
    clearing solution

28
References
  • Prakash, U., Advances in Bronchoscopic
    Techniques., American College of Chest
    Physicians, 1999(116) 1403-1408.
  • Ernst, A., et. al., Interventional Pulmonary
    Procedures., American College of Chest
    Physicians., 2003(123) 1693-1717
  • Leh, S., Mayse, M., Role of Interventional
    Pulmonology., Washington University in St. Louis.
  • http//www.barnant.com/products.php?product5
  • Shaw Stainless-http//www.stainlessandalloy.com/
  • Ohio Laser-http//www.ohiolaser.com
  • Precision Extrusion-http//www.precisionextrusion.
    com
  • http//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Press_fit
  • http//circ.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/full/98/8/
    742
  • http//www.rit.edu/rfaite/courses/tflab/Cussons/p
    elton/pelton.htm
  • http//www.blackwellpublishing.com/xml/dtds/4-0/he
    lp/10003420_chapter_1.pdf

29
Questions?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com