Title: Assessment and Interviewing
1Assessment and Interviewing
2(Page Stritzke, 2006)
3Matching
- Linking a client to the appropriate treatment
option - Screening and problem description (in which a
decision is made about the need for further
assessment and the presenting problems are
identified) - Treatment matching (in which specific information
is collected that aids the clinical
decision-making process).
4Measurement
- Pre, post, and follow-up assessments of a
variable(s) to determine the amount of change
that has occurred as a result of an intervention.
5Monitoring
- Use of periodic assessment to intervention
outcomes to permit inferences about what has
produced the observed change. - Progress monitoring is aimed at determining
deviations from the expected course of
improvement whereas - Outcomes monitoring focuses upon the aspects of
the intervention process that bring about change - Andrews Page (2006)
6Management
- Ongoing assessment and evaluation of clinical and
administrative processes involved in the delivery
of care. - The role of psychological testing has expanded
beyond client assessment and includes the
management context. - Total Quality Management (TQM)
- Continuous Quality Improvement (CQI)
- Health increasingly viewed as an industry
- offer effective services in an efficient manner
- demonstrate client satisfaction
- demonstrate to each patient how much they have
changed as a result of contact with a service - Psychologists have expertise in assessment and
measurement
7Consumer Outcome Measures
8Criteria for Selection
- Applicability
- Acceptability
- Practicality
- Reliability
- Validity
- Sensitivity to change
9Theory-Based Assessment of Panic Disorder
- Page (1998). Current Opinion in Psychiatry.
10Diagnostic Interviewing
11DSM-IV Multiaxial Assessment
- Axis I Clinical Disorders
- gt1 Axis I disorder, all reported principal
diagnosis or reason for visit indicated by
listing it first. - Principal diagnosis or reason for visit assumed
to be Axis I unless Axis II diagnosis is followed
by "(Principal Diagnosis)" or "(Reason for
Visit)." - No Axis I disorder, code V71.09.
- Axis I diagnosis deferred, pending additional
information, code 799.9.
12DSM-IV Multiaxial Assessment
- Disorders 1st Diagnosed in Infancy, Childhood, or
Adolescence (not MR) - Delirium, Dementia, Amnestic Other Cognitive
Disorders - Mental Disorders Due to a General Medical
Condition - Substance-Related Disorders
- Schiz. Other Psychotic Disorders
- Mood Disorders
- Anxiety Disorders
- Somatoform Disorders
- Factitious Disorders
- Dissociative Disorders
- Sexual Gender Identity Disorders
- Eating Disorders
- Sleep Disorders
- Impulse-Control Disorders NEC
- Adjustment Disorders
- Other Conditions
13DSM-IV Multiaxial Assessment
- Axis II Personality Disorders Mental
Retardation - Paranoid Personality Disorder
- Schizoid Personality Disorder
- Schizotypal Personality Disorder
- Antisocial Personality Disorder
- Borderline Personality Disorder
- Histrionic Personality Disorder
- Narcissistic Personality Disorder
- Avoidant Personality Disorder
- Dependent Personality Disorder
- Obsessive-Compulsive Personality Disorder
- Personality Disorder Not Otherwise Specified
- Mental Retardation
14DSM-IV Multiaxial Assessment
- Axis III Medical Conditions
- Axis IV Psychosocial and Environmental Problems
- Problems with primary support group
- Problems related to the social environment
- Educational problems
- Occupational problems
- Housing problems
- Economic problems
- Problems with access to health care
- Problems related to interaction with the legal
system/crime - Other PE problems
- Axis V Global Assessment of Functioning
15ICD-10
- The official coding system is the International
Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision,
(ICD-10 WHO, 1992) - Most DSM-IV-TR disorders have a numerical ICD-10
code - ICD-10 does not use a multiaxial system of
diagnosis, although there is discussion of a
triaxial system in which there are the clinical
diagnoses on Axis I, Disabilities on Axis II, and
contextual factors on Axis III. - The first volume includes the clinical
descriptions and the diagnostic guidelines
16ICD Structure
- (i) Organic, including symptomatic, mental
disorders (e.g., dementia in Alzheimer's disease) - (ii) Mental and behavioral disorders due to
psychoactive substance use (e.g., harmful use of
alcohol) - (iii) Schizophrenia, schizotypal and delusional
disorders - (iv) Mood (affective) disorders
- (v) Neurotic, stress-related and somatoform
disorders (e.g., generalized anxiety disorder) - (vi) Behavioral syndromes associated with
physiological disturbances and physical factors
(e.g., eating disorders) - (vii) Disorders of adult personality and behavior
(e.g., transsexualism) - (viii) Mental retardation
- (ix) Disorders of psychological development
(e.g., childhood autism) - (x) Behavioral and emotional disorders with onset
usually occurring in childhood and adolescence
(e.g., conduct disorders).
17Panic Attack
- Discrete period of intense fear or discomfort,
gt4 developed abruptly and peaked within 10
minutes - (1) palpitations, pounding heart, or accelerated
HR - (2) sweating
- (3) trembling or shaking
- (4) sensations of shortness of breath or
smothering - Cont
18Panic Attack
- (5) feeling of choking
- (6) chest pain or discomfort
- (7) nausea or abdominal distress
- (8) feeling dizzy, unsteady, lightheaded, or
faint - (9) derealization or depersonalization
- (10) fear of losing control or going crazy
- (11) fear of dying
- (12) paresthesias
- (13) chills or hot flushes
19Agoraphobia
- A. Anxiety about being in places or situations
from which escape difficult (or embarrassing) or
in which help may not be available in event of
unexpected or situationally predisposed PA or
panic-like symptoms. - B. Situations are avoided (e.g., travel is
restricted) or else are endured with marked
distress or with anxiety about having a Panic
Attack or panic-like symptoms, or require the
presence of a companion. - C. Not better accounted for
20Panic Disorder Agoraphobia
- panic attacks
- avoidance of panic-related situations
- worry about future attacks
21Diagnostic Interviewing
- Since your aim will be to assist a client discuss
what could well be sensitive, distressing,
private, and damaging issues, it is necessary - Good rapport is established
- Courteous
- Questioning open
22Adapted from Andrews, et al. Best practice
guideline for Panic Disorder Agoraphobia.
- An interview to diagnose panic disorder needs to
clearly establish what it is that the individual
is fearful of. - The clinician needs to gather details of
symptomatology including information to aid
differential diagnosis.
23(No Transcript)
24(No Transcript)
25(No Transcript)
26(No Transcript)
27Theories
- Biological theories
- Familial factors
- Unique biological processes
- Focus panic-related symptoms
- Psychological theories
- Particular cognitions
- Cognitive processes
- Focus panic-related cognitions
28Symptom Groupings
- Lovibond depression, anxiety stress (worry or
tension) - Ormel depression, anxiety avoidance
- Page anxiety and tension
- Thus,
- Anxiety / fear
- Worry / stress / tension
- Phobic avoidance
29A Common Thread?
- Zinbarg Barlow (see also Spence) A higher
order general factor differentiated each of the
patient groups from the no mental disorder group.
Several lower order factors provided the basis
for differentiation among the patient groups (p.
181) - What is this common thread?
30General Neurotic Syndrome
- Andrews Common causes chief among these being a
largely inherited tendency to arouse rapidly and
excessively under stress (i.e., elevated trait
anxiety or Neuroticism).
31Assessment of the Nature of Panic Disorder
32Assessing General Symptoms and Vulnerability
- General Neurotic Syndrome implies that assessment
should evaluate both the general and specific
structures of neurotic symptoms and the
underlying vulnerability - Depression Anxiety Stress Scale (DASS)
- Neuroticism subscale of Eysenck Personality
Questionnaire
33Diagnosing Syndrome-Specific Symptoms
- Structured diagnostic interviews
- ADIS-R
- CIDI
34Assessment of Panic-Related Symptoms General
Measures
- panic frequency, severity, and duration
- panic-related phobias
- anticipatory anxiety
- impairment and general quality of life
- global problem severity
35Assessment of Panic-Related Symptoms General
Measures
- Panic and Agoraphobia Scale (PA)
- Panic-Associated Symptoms Scale (PASS)
36Assessment of Panic-Related Symptoms Specific
Aspects
- Symptoms
- Panic Attacks Symptom Questionnaire (PASQ)
- Body Sensations Questionnaire (BSQ)
- Cognitions
- Agoraphobic Cognitions Questionnaire (ACQ) and
BSQ - Anxiety Sensitivity Inventory (ASI)
- Anxiety Control Questionnaire (ACQ)
37Clinical Significance
- Jacobson Truax Reliable Change
- Change from pre to post-test for patient beyond
1.96 times measurement error of instrument used - Clinically significant patient having
significant RC score and moving into normal range
on instrument (halfway between normal
pathological)
38Clinical Significance
- Michelson
- Complete BAT with min. / no anxiety
- Score of 1-2 (5-pt scale) of clinician-rated
global functioning - Score between 0 and 2 on 9-pt self rating of
phobias - Score lt 4 on 9-point self-rating scale of phobic
anxiety avoidance
39Summary
40Directing an Interview
- Choice of direction remain with a discussion of
the presenting problem and elicit general
personal and historical information later - Advantages interview continues to flow naturally
and the client keeps relating the details of the
presenting problem until they have said
everything they wish to say - Weakness clinician does not have a good picture
of the client as a person, the social and
historical background to the problems, a sense of
other psychological problems, and so on. - Clinician could signal a change of direction by
saying perhaps, Thank you. You have given me an
idea of the difficulties that you are having. I
would like to pursue them in more detail, but
before we talk about these difficulties I was
wondering if I could get some idea about you as a
person?
41Continuing the Interview
- Assuming that the clinician has decided to pursue
the former line, the interview will seek to
extend the inquiry perhaps by signally such with
the comment, I wonder if we could discuss the
difficulty you have been mentioning in some
detail. When did you first notice that something
was not right? - This will direct the client to discuss the
evolution of the problem acknowledging the fact
that psychological difficulties exist in a
dynamically evolving system. However, within the
complexity, the clinician will be focused on
trying to highlight the key milestones in the
problem development.
42Continuing the Interview
- This history will lead the client towards the
present, at which time it will be possible to get
a clearer description of the difficulties and any
associated behaviors - As a mental checklist, the clinician will be
aiming to identify - (i) what the problem is
- (ii) when it occurs
- (iii) where it happens
- (iv) how frequently the problem takes place
- (v) with whom these difficulties arise
- (vi) how distressing
- (vii) impairing the problem is
- The interview will evolve from a historical
discussion to consideration of the problem in its
current form. The clinician might ask, Could
you please tell me about a typical day or
occurrence of the problem? and then explore some
of the maintaining factors - The clinician will also ask about the variability
in the problem and factors associated with the
fluctuations (i.e., moderating variables).
43Integrating Background Details
- After the clinician has a good sense of the
presenting problem, its present manifestation,
and its history, the interview can expand to
provide a more complete picture of the person. - You have given me a good idea of the problems
you are struggling with, but I dont think I have
got a good idea about you as a person. Could you
tell me something about you, apart from these
difficulties? - The aim of this process is to be able to put
yourself in the clients shoes and imagine what
it must be like to experience the life that the
client has had. - may be relevant to ask about family history
(details of parents, other significant figures,
brothers and sisters, as well as the childhood
environment of family, school, and peers), a
personal history (birth date and any significant
issues, general adjustment in childhood, lifelong
traits or behavioral patterns and tendencies,
significant life events), schooling (duration and
significant events), work history and present
duties, relationships (current status, history
and problems), leisure activities, living
arrangements, social relationships, prior
significant accidents, diseases and mental health
problems, and personality (and particularly any
changes).
44Coping Resources
- Enquire about coping resources and any assets in
terms of personal strengths the individual
possesses - Motivation for change is a critical dimension
- identify the motivations intrinsic to the person,
but identify any extrinsic motivators that are
present or have been successful in the past - Identify the stage of change that the client is
in - Prochaska, Norcross, and DiClemente, (1995
Prochaska Norcross, 1998) see also Miller and
Rollnicks (2002) book.
45Finishing
- At the end of the interview, the clinician will
need to summarize and synthesize the material
covered. - I will try to draw together many of the themes
we have been discussing. If I miss something
out, or show that I have got a point wrong,
please let me know. - It is also wise to ask the client if there are
any problems or issues which you have not asked
them about or which there has not been time to
discuss.
46Useful Resources
- Hersen, M., Turner, S. M. (2003). Diagnostic
interviewing (Third Edition). New York Kluwer
Academic/Plenum. - Sattler, D. N., Shabatay, V., Kramer, G. P.
(1998). Abnormal psychology in context Voices
and perspectives. New York Houghton Mifflin. - Meyer, R. G. (2003). Case studies in abnormal
behavior (Sixth edition). Boston Allyn Bacon. - Oltmans, T. F., Neale, J. M., Davison, G. C.
(2003). Case studies in abnormal psychology
(Sixth edition). New York Wiley. - Rogers, R. (2001). Handbook of diagnostic and
structured interviewing. New York Guilford. - Spitzer, R. L., Gibbon, M., Skodol, A. E.,
Williams, J. B.W., First M. B. (2001).
DSM-IV-TR Casebook A Learning Companion to the
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental
Disorders, Fourth Edition, Text Revision.
Washington APA Press.
47Useful References
- Beck, J. S. (1995). Cognitive therapy Basics and
beyond. New York Guilford. (Esp. chapters 3-5). - Miller, W. R., Rollnick, S. (Eds.). (2002).
Motivational interviewing Preparing people for
change (2nd ed.). New York, NY Guilford Press. - Norcross, J. C. (2002). Psychotherapy
relationships that work Therapist contributions
and responsiveness to patients. New York Oxford
University press.
48Structured and Semi-structured Diagnostic
Interviews
- Structured diagnostic interviews are particularly
helpful in - research (where replicablity is essential), in
training (where the structure can assist a novice
clinician) - practice (where use of a standardized instrument
can increase the confidence in a diagnosis) - Evaluate the instrument in terms of
- (i) coverage and content
- (ii) the target population
- (iii) the psychometric features of the instrument
- (iv) practical issues (e.g., duration, training)
- (v) administration requirements, and support
(e.g., scoring algorithms, standardized manual).
49Anxiety Disorders Interview Schedule for DSM-IV
(ADIS-IV)
- The ADIS-IV (Brown, Di Nardo, Barlow, 1994) is
a semi-structured interview that follows a
structure similar to a clinical interview and
relies of the clinician to ask additional
questions to follow up issues of relevance - Although its primary focus is the DSM-IV Anxiety
Disorders, it also assesses Mood, Substance Use,
and Somatoform Disorders due to their high rates
of comorbidity with anxiety - The whole interview assessing current and
lifetime disorders takes 2-4 hours in clinical
samples. - Reliability of the instrument is acceptable and
the limited validity data upon its predecessor
are supportive (e.g., Rapee, Brown, Antony,
Barlow, 1992) - Suitable as a primary diagnostic measure when
used by trained mental health professionals.
50Diagnostic Interview Schedule (DIS) Composite
International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI)
- The DIS-IV (Robins, Cottler, Bucholz, Compton,
1995) is a structured diagnostic interview that
is suitable for use by lay interviewers as well
as mental health professionals - The CIDI (Robins et al., 1988) is compatible with
both DSM-IV and ICD-10 - Modular format to permit customization of the
interview and the structured format has permitted
computerization - Administration time is 2-3 hours with clinical
samples and they yield both current and lifetime
diagnoses - Useful in large scale epidemiological studies,
but the level of agreement with clinical
diagnoses is poor thus, not suitable as a primary
diagnostic instrument in a psychiatric setting.
51Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview
(MINI)
- The MINI (Sheehan, Janavus, Baker,
Harnett-Sheehan, Knapp, Sheehan, 1999) is a
clinician-administered structured diagnostic
interview that assesses both DSM-IV and ICD-10
criteria - Valid structured interview for clinical and
research contexts, it covers a broad range of
disorders, but does so in around 15 minutes - Reliability and validity promising (Sheehan et
al., 1998).
52Primary Care Evaluation of Mental Disorders
(PRIME-MD)
- PRIME-MD is a brief (10-20 min or 3 mins using
the more recent Patient Health Questionnaire
Spitzer, Kroenke, Williams, 1999)
clinician-administered interview to permit
primary care physicians to rapidly identify the
mental disorders commonly seen in medical
practice (Spitzer et al., 1995) - 25-item page self-report questionnaire asking
about general physical and mental health issues
and a semistructured interview to follows up on
items that the patient has endorsed, the
instrument provides a quick assessment of DSM-IV
mood, anxiety, somatoform, eating, and
alcohol-related disorders - In terms of validity, its sensitivity and
specificity are good, although the correspondence
with DSM-IV was only moderate. - Fraguas et al (2006) found a kappa with SCID of
.42 for SD and .32 for MDD, but low frequency of
depression in sample - Another instrument suitable for use in primary
care is the Symptom-Driven Diagnostic System for
Primary Care (SDDS-PC Broadhead et al., 1995).
53Schedule for Affective Disorders and
Schizophrenia (SADS)
- The SADS (Endicott Spitzer, 1978) is a
clinician-administered semistructured interview
developed to assess the research diagnostic
criteria. - assesses current (i.e., past year) and past
symptoms, with other versions assessing symptoms
across the whole lifetime (SADS-L Lifetime), and
changes in symptoms (SADS-C Change), SADS-LA-IV
(SADS Lifetime Anxiety for DSM-IV Fyer,
Endicott, Mannuza, Klein, 1995 cited in
Summerfeldt Antony, 2002) also assesses DSM-IV
criteria in addition to expanded coverage of
anxiety disorders - SADS interview takes an hour with non-clinical
samples, and this short duration, given to its
breadth of coverage, is achieved by a structure
that permits clinicians to skip sections that are
not relevant because the respondent fails to
endorse screening questions or they are not
germane to the interview purpose - Reliability excellent, when compared with the
other structured diagnostic interviews (Rogers,
1995) and the validity is very good (see Conoley
Impara, 1995), particularly in the area of mood
disorders, making it well-suited as a primary
diagnostic screening measure.
54Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis-I
Disorders (SCID)
- The SCID versions
- brief clinical (SCID-CV First, Spitzer, Gibbon,
Williams, 1997) - research (SCID-I First, Spitzer, Gibbon,
Williams, 1996) - Axis II Personality Disorders
- SCID-CV - brief interview that provides coverage
of the disorders commonly seen in a mental health
practice - version designed for individual already
identified as psychiatric patients (SCID-I/P) -
extensive coverage of mental health disorders of
all available instruments, with interviews taking
at least an hour - Reliability is good (Segal et al., 1994) and
validity studies of previous versions have also
been supportive of the instrument (Rogers, 1995
2001).
55Schedule for Clinical Assessment in
Neuropsychiatry (SCAN)
- The SCAN (WHO, 1998) seeks to describe key
symptoms - semistructured clinical interview
- a glossary to rate the experiences endorsed by
respondents - a checklist to rate information provided by third
parties - a schedule to assess the respondents clinical,
social, and developmental history - data can be scored to generate DSM-IV and ICD-10
diagnoses.