Changes in Global Land Surface Moisture Conditions During 1950-2004 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Changes in Global Land Surface Moisture Conditions During 1950-2004

Description:

Changes in Global Land Surface Moisture Conditions During 19502004 – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:33
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 28
Provided by: kevin546
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Changes in Global Land Surface Moisture Conditions During 1950-2004


1
Changes in Global Land Surface Moisture
Conditions During 1950-2004
  • Aiguo Dai
  • National Center for Atmospheric Research,
    Boulder, CO, USA
  • Workshop on Vulnerability of the Carbon Cycle to
    Drought and Fire
  • 5-9 June 2006, Canberra, Australia
  • Collaborators Taotao Qian and Kevin
    Trenberth

2
Outline
  • Observed changes in surface air temperature,
    precipitation, humidity, and soil moisture
  • Land surface model-simulated changes in soil
    moisture content and PDSI changes
  • Global climate model-simulated changes
  • Summary

3
Sfc. T Trend 1950-2005 CRU data
4
EOF 1 of Land Precip is Associated with ENSO
ENSO SST
PC 1
Dai et al. 1997
5
Sahel Rainfall 1948-2004
T
P
Sahel 10o-20oN, 18oW-20oE
6
Eastern (gt135oE) Australian Rainfall 1948-2005
P
Slope ?0.034 mm/day/decade
ENSO
P data PRECL (NCEP) (1948-1996) GPCP
(1997-2005) ENSO Index http//www.cdc.noaa.gov/pe
ople/klaus.wolter/MEI/
7
Trends in Surface Humidity 1976-2004
Dai 2006, J. Climate
8
Surface specific humidity q from Reanalyses
Global (60S-75N) Land
Observations
Northern Hemisphere Land
ERA-40 Reanalysis
NCEP/NCAR Re.
Southern Hemisphere Land
9
Trends in Soil Moisture Sparse Observations
(Robock et al.2000 2005)
10
How have the observed changes in P,T and other
fields affected global soil moisture?
  • Because of a lack of observations, we employed
    three different approaches to examine historical
    changes in global soil moisture content
  • Analysis of the Palmer Drought Severity Index
    (PDSI) calculated from observed T and P based on
    the Palmer model (a bucket-type model) (see Dai
    et al. 2004)
  • Analysis of the soil moisture content simulated
    by a comprehensive land surface model (namely
    CLM3) forced by observation-based atmospheric
    forcing
  • Analysis of soil moisture changes in global
    climate models.

11
Palmer Drought Severity Index (PDSI)
  • The PDSI is computed using a bucket-type land
    surface model using observed P (Chen et al.02)
    and T (Jones Moberg03)
  • It is a normalized measure of the cumulative
    departure in atmospheric moisture supply (P) and
    demand (E) at the surface
  • E is based on Thornthwaite (1948)
  • PDSI is correlated with observed soil moisture
    content
  • Caveats No vegetation, no snow processes, crude
    estimate of E, not always comparable spatially,
    etc.

12
PDSI vs. Observed Soil Moisture Content
(from Dai et al.04, JHM)
Illinois
d
(Soil moisture data from Robock et al.00 and
Hollinger Isard94)
13
PDSI vs. Streamflow
Paraná
Streamflow
PDSI
Amazon
Lena
Congo
Columbia
Orinoco
Changjing
Mississippi
14
CLM3 Simulations 1948-2004
  • CLM3 Community Land Model Version 3, a
    comprehensive land surface model designed for
    coupled climate simulations. It simulates most
    land surface processes, including surface fluxes,
    land hydrology, and stomatal physiology and
    photosynthesis.
  • The CLM3 was run at T42 (2.8o) with the spatial
    heterogeneity of land surface represented as a
    nested sub-grid hierarchy in which grid cells are
    composed of multiple land units, snow/soil
    columns, and plant functional types. (Oleson et
    al. 2004).
  • The CLM3 forcing data combine intra-month
    variations from the NCEP/NCAR or ERA40 reanalysis
    with longer-term variations from observations
    (Qian et al. 2006). Variables T, P, q, V, Ps and
    S?.
  • For example Precipitation P (Pmo / Pmr) Pr,
    where Pmo is observed monthly precip. from Chen
    et al.(2002), Pmr is monthly precip. from
    Reanalysis, Pr is 6-hourly precipitation from the
    reanalysis.

15
NCAR CLM3 Structure
Oleson et al. 2004 ( http//www.ccsm.ucar.edu/mode
ls/ccsm3.0/ )
16
CLM3-simulated vs. Observed 1m Soil Moisture
Obs.
CLM
Illinois
r 0.87
Year
Obs.
CLM
E. China
r 0.63
Year
17
River outflow for Worlds 200 Largest Rivers
18
Streamflow CLM3 vs. Obs.
Amazon
Paraná
Obs.
CLM
Lena
Congo
Orinoco
Columbia
Changjing
Mississippi
Yenisey
19
(No Transcript)
20
Trends from 1948-2004
PDSI (change/50yrs)
Soil Water from CLM3 (mm/50yrs)
21
mm/50yr
All Forcing
Trends in CLM3- smulated top 1m soil water from
3 runs
dP only
Red Drying
dT only
22
Evap.
CLM3-simulated E and Soil Water from 3 Runs,
60oS-75oN Averages
All Forcing Run
Precip.-only Run
Temp.-only Run
Soil Water
23
Precipitation, PDSI and CLM3-simualted Soil Water
over Eastern Australia
Precip.
PDSI
Soil Water
24
Global Percentage Dry Areas
Based on PDSI
Based on CLM3
Dry cases Bottom 20 percentiles
25
Sensitivity of the Dry Area to Precip. and Temp.
Changes
26
Total Soil Moisture Simuluated by Coupled
GCMs From IPCC AR4 Historical Runs
Year
27
Soil Moisture Trends in Coupled GCM
Simulations IPCC 20th Century All Forcing Run,
1948-1999, ANN
CCSM3
HadCM3
GFDL CM2.1
GISS
Red Drying
28
Projected Soil Moisture Changes () by Coupled
GCMs IPCC SRES A1B, 2080-2099 minus 2000-2019,
JJA
GFDL
CCSM3
GISS
HadCM3

Red Drying in 2080-2099
29
Summary
  • Both the PDSI and CLM3 simulations show a general
    drying trend over global land areas since the
    1970s
  • Large warming during recent decades over Eurasia
    and northern N. America enhanced evaporation and
    contributed to the drying in the N. Hemisphere
  • Precipitation decreases over Africa, East Asia
    and East Australia are the main cause of the
    drying in these regions
  • Both the PDSI and CLM3 simulations show 50 or
    more increases in global dry areas since the
    1970s, with a large jump in the early 1980s due
    to 1982/83 El Niño
  • Coupled GCM simulations also suggest a general
    drying over global land areas since the 1970s,
    although the magnitude and regional patterns
    differ among the models and
  • Actual trends in soil moisture may be influenced
    by irrigation and other human activities, which
    are not considered here.

30
Visit www.cgd.ucar.edu/cas/adai for related
papers and the PDSI and other data sets.
Related publications Dai, A., K. E. Trenberth,
and T. Qian, 2004 A global data set of Palmer
Drought Severity Index for 1870-2002
Relationship with soil moisture and effects of
surface warming. J. Hydrometeorology,  5,
1117-1130. Qian, T., A. Dai, K. E. Trenberth,
and K. W. Oleson, 2006 Simulation of global land
surface conditions from 1948-2004. Part I
Forcing data and evaluation.J. Hydrometeorol., in
press.
31
All forcing run 60S-75N
32
Effects of T and P on PDSI
PDSI Trends 1950-2002
Red Drying
dTdP case
Most red areas are statisitically significant
dP only case
33
CLM Simulations 1948-2002
  • CLM3 a comprehensive land surface model
    designed for coupled climate simulations. It
    simulates most land surface processes, including
    surface fluxes, soil and snow processes and land
    hydrology (Oleson et al. 2004).
  • The CLM3 forcing data combine intra-month
    variations from the NCEP/NCAR atmospheric
    reanalysis with longer-term variations from
    station records (Qian et al. 2005). Variables T,
    P, q, V, Ps and downward solar radiation.
  • CLM simulations All-forcing run, dT and dP runs.

34
Palmer Drought Severity Index (PDSI)
  • The PDSI is computed using a bucket-type land
    surface model using observed P (Chen et al.02)
    and T (Jones Moberg03)
  • It is a normalized measure of the cumulative
    departure in atmospheric moisture supply (P) and
    demand (PE) at the surface
  • PE is based on Thornthwaite (1948)
  • PDSI is correlated with observed soil moisture
    content
  • Caveats No vegetation, no snow processes, crude
    estimate of E, not always comparable spatially,
    etc.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com