Reasons for Historic Preservation - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 27
About This Presentation
Title:

Reasons for Historic Preservation

Description:

Improves business, tourism and image. Utilizes ... 2nd Ordinance: Vieux Carre' Old French Quarter in New Orleans: 1936. 1939: San Antonio ordinance. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:110
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 28
Provided by: larry262
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Reasons for Historic Preservation


1
Reasons for Historic Preservation
  • Need due to deterioration
  • Urban center revitalization
  • Economic
  • Preservation of Neighborhood
  • Infrastructure

2
Why Preservation
  • Creates jobs in construction
  • Improves property values
  • Brings hope and commitment to previously hopeless
    neighborhoods.
  • Reduces crime
  • Improves business, tourism and image
  • Utilizes underutilized infrastructure
  • Slows suburbanization, urban sprawl

3
ARCH 5325Conservation Policies
  • Chapter 2
  • The Preservation Movement in the United States

4
  • Preservation or the maintenance of
  • buildings has been around
  • for a long time
  • Concerted efforts began in the
  • 1500s in Western Europe

5

Private Efforts 19th C Americans began to save
homes of patriots and other places where historic
events took place. Mount Vernon Ladies
Association first preservation group. 1924 San
Antonio Conservation Society
6
Federal Efforts Antiquities Act of 1906. Only
for federally owned propertiesMesa Verde,
battlefields, and other sites
7
  • 1916National Park Service created

8
  • 1934 Historic American Building Survey
    (HABS)depression era project for site of
    national significance
  • 1969 Historic American Engineering Record (HAER)
  • 2000 Historic American Landscape Survey (HALS)

9
  • National Trust for Historic Preservation
  • 1949

10
  • Mid-20th C.
  • Other buildings became more important
  • Criteria began to include
  • connections with the
  • quality of a building
  • the architect
  • more modest buildings
  • age

11
  • 1966 National Historic Preservation Act
  • encourages local historic districtscontext of
    individual buildings
  • enabling legislation to fund preservation
    activities
  • encouraged owners of private properties to
    preserve while not interfering with ownership
    rights

12
  • 1966 National Historic Preservation Act
  • Created
  • The National Register of Historic Places
  • State Historic Preservation Officers
  • Advisory Council on Historic Preservation

13
SHPOTexas Historical Commission
  • Responsible for surveys of historic sites and
    properties throughout the state
  • Processes nominations to the NRHP
  • Administers grants (when available)

14
SHPOTexas Historical Commission
  • Advises and assists local efforts
  • Provides consultation on Section 106 Review
  • Reviews applications for federal investment tax
    credits (or state) when available

15
  • 1966 Preservation Act also led to
  • The creation of the Local Historic Preservation
    Officer
  • Certified Local Governmentgrants
  • Urban Design Commissions
  • and local organizations

16
Certified Local Governments
  • Must have established a historic preservation
    commission with powers of review
  • Must tie its system of surveying historic
    properties to the SHPOs procedures
  • Must be willing to enforce state and local
    preservation ordinances
  • Must have a designated local historic
    preservation officer

17
  • Main Street Program1980

18
Building Collections Colonial Williamsburg1926
Greenfield Village1929 Corpus Christi
Heritage Park Dallas Heritage Center National
Ranching Heritage Center1976 Muleshoe Heritage
Center
19
Chapter 3Historic Districts
  • Charleston, SC 1931 Historic Zoning ordinance to
    protect existing buildings.
  • 2nd Ordinance Vieux Carre Old French Quarter in
    New Orleans 1936
  • 1939 San Antonio ordinance.
  • 1958 Santa Fe ordinance

20
  • Reasons for Ordinance
  • Threat of loss of significant properties for
    protection
  • Control of New developmentloss of character
  • Encourage new developmentdeterioration of assets
    or loss of revenue
  • Tool for maintaining or stabilizing property
    values

21
  • Districts in Lubbock
  • TTU
  • 19th Street
  • South Overton
  • Broadway
  • Depot District
  • Original Square Mile

22
  • Districts can be contiguous or non-contiguous
    (more difficult)
  • The group together is more significant than
    individual buildings
  • Examples Overton or Depot District,
    Fredericksburg, TX

23
  • Must have unifying elements
  • Age
  • Design
  • Era
  • Historic
  • Residential or Commercial or Industrial
  • Buildings can be contributing or non-contributing
  • Range of High, Medium or Low Integrity

24
  • Boundaries
  • Must be logical
  • Have integrity
  • High ratio of historic to non-historic

25
  • Submission of request for designation
  • Historical Significance
  • Map
  • of historic to non-historic, significant to
    non-significant, contributing to non-contributing
  • Description of buildingssurvey
  • Photographs

26
  • Ordinance should have no conflict with building
    code or zoning ordinance
  • Must have objective rational standards or
    criteria, and be clear

27
  • How do you get buy-in from constituents
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com