Title: Yellowstone Mystery Who did it Eyewitness Memories
1Yellowstone MysteryWho did it? Eyewitness
Memories
- Developed by Maggie Renken
- University of Wyoming
- Fall 2007
2Part 1
3I know that face!
- Face-recognition rates are usually around 90
Wow! Thats extremely high!
So eyewitness memory must be pretty
accurateright?
No, this 90 accuracy rate does not apply to a
criminals face
4Why isnt eyewitness memory very accurate?
- Witness Factors
- Age
- Exposure Duration
- Race
- Confidence
- Reaction Time
- Weapon Focus
- System Variables
- Verbal Overshadowing
- Lineup
- Post event information
- Post-identification feedback
5Witness factor Age
- Children are unreliable witnesses
- Adults over 60 are more
- likely to make false identifications
6Witness Factor Exposure Duration
- The longer the exposurethe more accurate the
identification - BUT
- the longer the exposure,
- the more confident
- the witness,
- even if wrong
7Witness Factor Race
- Better at recognizing own-race faces
- Recognize own-race faces holistically rather than
by features - Holistic recognition comes from experience with
or exposure to other races
8Witness Factor Confidence
- Confidence is a weak predictor of eyewitness
accuracy - Confidence ? Accuracy
9Witness Factor Reaction Time
- If an eyewitness comes to a decision within a
10-12 second window, they are more likely to be
accurate - In combination with confidence, 90 accurate
10Witness Factor Weapon Focus
- A witness confronted with a weapon tends to focus
on the weapon rather than the perpetrators face. - Flashbulb memory
- Challenger Study
- High arousal did not lead to better memory
11Yerkes-Dodson LawArousal Memory
Performance
low
moderate
high
Emotional Arousal
12System Variable Verbal Overshadowing
- Verbally describing a face can impair future
attempts to identify the face - Individuals who first described a face were 1.27
times more likely to misidentify the face from a
lineup
13System Variable Lineup Fairness
- People in the lineup should be selected based on
similarity to the perpetrator - No individual should stand out in the lineup
- The interviewer should not favor any individual
in the lineup
14System Variable Lineup Presentation Mode
- Conventional Simultaneous Parade
- All faces presented at the same time
- Fosters a relative judgment strategy
- Sequential Lineup
- Faces presented one at a time
- Absolute yes or no for each face
15System Variable Post event information
- Information given to the eyewitness after the
event occurs - Loftus Palmer (1974)
- Does post-event information
- alter memory for the original event?
- Background
- Humans are not good at estimating numerical
quantities (time, speed, distance, angle)
16Loftus Palmer (1974) Procedure
- How fast were the vehicles
- going when they
- Group 1 smashed into each other?
- Group 2 collided?
- Group 3 bumped into each other?
- Group 4 hit each other?
- Group 5 contacted?
17Loftus Palmer (1974) Results
18Loftus Palmer (1974) Conclusion
- Post-event leading questions
- clearly influence memory for the original event.
- can bias numerical estimates.
- Original information and post-information are
integrated into a single memory - People no longer discriminate between original
and post-event information.
19System Variable Post Identification Feedback
- Information that is conveyed to the
- eyewitness after he or she identified
- a perpetrator from a lineup
20Wells Bradfield (1998)
- Participants watched a brief clip of a crime
- Then, they picked a suspect from a photospread
- The suspect wasnt present
- Some were given confirming feedback
- Good, you identified the suspect
- Confirmation increased certainty, self-reports of
viewing quality, memory clarity, speed of
identification.
21Effects on Confidence
11-12 years old
(Hafstad, Memon, Logie, 2004)
22Effects on Clarity of Memory
23Interpretation of Effects
- Could this be hindsight bias?
- Told the correct answer, witness assumes they
knew it all along? - Is the post-id feedback effect similar to the
post-event misinformation effect?
24Part 2
25What is memory?
- Memory
- the persistence of learning over time through
the storage and retrieval of information
26Information Processing
- Encoding
- We get info into our brain
- Storage
- We keep that information
- Retrieval
- We get it back out later
27Model of Memory
External events
storage
Sensory memory
Long-term memory
Short-term memory
encoding
retrieval
28Working Memory
- Processing images and words at the same time
29Interesting Memory Phenomena
- The next-in-line effect
- Learning right before sleep
- Learning during sleep
30The rioter threw?
- Our memory system processes info not just by
repetitive rehearsal but also by coding its
significant features - We remember what we encoded, not necessarily
exactly what happened
31Encoding Verbal Info
- Semantic encoding (meaning)
- Acoustic encoding (sound)
- Visual encoding (images)
- Information encoded semantically is more easily
retrieved because it is processed at a deeper
level.
32Encoding Imagery
- Computer
- Empty
- Bicycle
- Inherent
- Fire
- Behavior
33Storing Memories
- Sensory memory
- Information first enters the memory system
through the senses. We register and briefly store
visual images and sounds - Short-term memory
- The span for information just presented is very
limited--a seconds-long retention of up to about
seven items, depending on the info and how it is
presented - Long-term memory
- Our capacity for storing information permanently
is essentially unlimited
34Storing Memories in the Brain
- The Hippocampus
- Brain scans reveal activity in the hippocampus
and certain areas of the frontal lobe when a
memory is created - The Cerebellum
- Memories for skills and conditioned associations
35Retrieval
- Getting information out
- Aided by cues
- Associations
- Contexts
36Context Effects
Percentage of Words Recalled
Same Contexts for hearing recall
Different Contexts for hearing recall
37Moods and Memories
- Mood-congruent memory
- the tendency to recall experiences that are
consistent with ones current good or bad mood
38Forgetting
- Encoding failures
- the info never gets in
- Storage failures
- fading of the memory record
- Retrieval failures
- from lack of retrieval cues or from the
interfering effects of other learning
39The End