Yellowstone Mystery Who did it Eyewitness Memories - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 39
About This Presentation
Title:

Yellowstone Mystery Who did it Eyewitness Memories

Description:

Yellowstone Mystery Who did it Eyewitness Memories – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:53
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 40
Provided by: uwyo
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Yellowstone Mystery Who did it Eyewitness Memories


1
Yellowstone MysteryWho did it? Eyewitness
Memories
  • Developed by Maggie Renken
  • University of Wyoming
  • Fall 2007

2
Part 1
  • Eyewitness Memory

3
I know that face!
  • Face-recognition rates are usually around 90

Wow! Thats extremely high!
So eyewitness memory must be pretty
accurateright?
No, this 90 accuracy rate does not apply to a
criminals face
4
Why isnt eyewitness memory very accurate?
  • Witness Factors
  • Age
  • Exposure Duration
  • Race
  • Confidence
  • Reaction Time
  • Weapon Focus
  • System Variables
  • Verbal Overshadowing
  • Lineup
  • Post event information
  • Post-identification feedback

5
Witness factor Age
  • Children are unreliable witnesses
  • Adults over 60 are more
  • likely to make false identifications

6
Witness Factor Exposure Duration
  • The longer the exposurethe more accurate the
    identification
  • BUT
  • the longer the exposure,
  • the more confident
  • the witness,
  • even if wrong

7
Witness Factor Race
  • Better at recognizing own-race faces
  • Recognize own-race faces holistically rather than
    by features
  • Holistic recognition comes from experience with
    or exposure to other races

8
Witness Factor Confidence
  • Confidence is a weak predictor of eyewitness
    accuracy
  • Confidence ? Accuracy

9
Witness Factor Reaction Time
  • If an eyewitness comes to a decision within a
    10-12 second window, they are more likely to be
    accurate
  • In combination with confidence, 90 accurate

10
Witness Factor Weapon Focus
  • A witness confronted with a weapon tends to focus
    on the weapon rather than the perpetrators face.
  • Flashbulb memory
  • Challenger Study
  • High arousal did not lead to better memory

11
Yerkes-Dodson LawArousal Memory
Performance
low
moderate
high
Emotional Arousal
12
System Variable Verbal Overshadowing
  • Verbally describing a face can impair future
    attempts to identify the face
  • Individuals who first described a face were 1.27
    times more likely to misidentify the face from a
    lineup

13
System Variable Lineup Fairness
  • People in the lineup should be selected based on
    similarity to the perpetrator
  • No individual should stand out in the lineup
  • The interviewer should not favor any individual
    in the lineup

14
System Variable Lineup Presentation Mode
  • Conventional Simultaneous Parade
  • All faces presented at the same time
  • Fosters a relative judgment strategy
  • Sequential Lineup
  • Faces presented one at a time
  • Absolute yes or no for each face

15
System Variable Post event information
  • Information given to the eyewitness after the
    event occurs
  • Loftus Palmer (1974)
  • Does post-event information
  • alter memory for the original event?
  • Background
  • Humans are not good at estimating numerical
    quantities (time, speed, distance, angle)

16
Loftus Palmer (1974) Procedure
  • How fast were the vehicles
  • going when they
  • Group 1 smashed into each other?
  • Group 2 collided?
  • Group 3 bumped into each other?
  • Group 4 hit each other?
  • Group 5 contacted?

17
Loftus Palmer (1974) Results
18
Loftus Palmer (1974) Conclusion
  • Post-event leading questions
  • clearly influence memory for the original event.
  • can bias numerical estimates.
  • Original information and post-information are
    integrated into a single memory
  • People no longer discriminate between original
    and post-event information.

19
System Variable Post Identification Feedback
  • Information that is conveyed to the
  • eyewitness after he or she identified
  • a perpetrator from a lineup

20
Wells Bradfield (1998)
  • Participants watched a brief clip of a crime
  • Then, they picked a suspect from a photospread
  • The suspect wasnt present
  • Some were given confirming feedback
  • Good, you identified the suspect
  • Confirmation increased certainty, self-reports of
    viewing quality, memory clarity, speed of
    identification.

21
Effects on Confidence
11-12 years old
(Hafstad, Memon, Logie, 2004)
22
Effects on Clarity of Memory
23
Interpretation of Effects
  • Could this be hindsight bias?
  • Told the correct answer, witness assumes they
    knew it all along?
  • Is the post-id feedback effect similar to the
    post-event misinformation effect?

24
Part 2
  • How Memory Works

25
What is memory?
  • Memory
  • the persistence of learning over time through
    the storage and retrieval of information

26
Information Processing
  • Encoding
  • We get info into our brain
  • Storage
  • We keep that information
  • Retrieval
  • We get it back out later

27
Model of Memory
External events
storage
Sensory memory
Long-term memory
Short-term memory
encoding
retrieval
28
Working Memory
  • Processing images and words at the same time

29
Interesting Memory Phenomena
  • The next-in-line effect
  • Learning right before sleep
  • Learning during sleep

30
The rioter threw?
  • Our memory system processes info not just by
    repetitive rehearsal but also by coding its
    significant features
  • We remember what we encoded, not necessarily
    exactly what happened

31
Encoding Verbal Info
  • Semantic encoding (meaning)
  • Acoustic encoding (sound)
  • Visual encoding (images)
  • Information encoded semantically is more easily
    retrieved because it is processed at a deeper
    level.

32
Encoding Imagery
  • Computer
  • Empty
  • Bicycle
  • Inherent
  • Fire
  • Behavior

33
Storing Memories
  • Sensory memory
  • Information first enters the memory system
    through the senses. We register and briefly store
    visual images and sounds
  • Short-term memory
  • The span for information just presented is very
    limited--a seconds-long retention of up to about
    seven items, depending on the info and how it is
    presented
  • Long-term memory
  • Our capacity for storing information permanently
    is essentially unlimited

34
Storing Memories in the Brain
  • The Hippocampus
  • Brain scans reveal activity in the hippocampus
    and certain areas of the frontal lobe when a
    memory is created
  • The Cerebellum
  • Memories for skills and conditioned associations

35
Retrieval
  • Getting information out
  • Aided by cues
  • Associations
  • Contexts

36
Context Effects
Percentage of Words Recalled
Same Contexts for hearing recall
Different Contexts for hearing recall
37
Moods and Memories
  • Mood-congruent memory
  • the tendency to recall experiences that are
    consistent with ones current good or bad mood

38
Forgetting
  • Encoding failures
  • the info never gets in
  • Storage failures
  • fading of the memory record
  • Retrieval failures
  • from lack of retrieval cues or from the
    interfering effects of other learning

39
The End
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com