Navellier Applied Research - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 45
About This Presentation
Title:

Navellier Applied Research

Description:

Trampoline Thought Experiment. Consider the case of two trampolines. ... Trampoline Example. Of the two, wouldn't this be the preferred investment manager? ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:19
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 46
Provided by: jameso6
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Navellier Applied Research


1
Navellier Applied Research
Exploring Aspects of Investment Statistics
  • Navellier Applied Research
  • Timothy A. Hope
  • Applied Research Analyst
  • 775-785-9416

2
This formula for standard deviation
3
Will NOT be seen for the remainder of this
presentation
Rest easy..lets discuss some ideas!
4
Statistics Appearance and Reality
  • While statistics can be useful in making
    investment decisions, it is important to
    recognize that they also carry some limitations.
  • Remember the old computer adage Garbage
    In/Garbage Out.

5
Problem with single computation statistics
  • What is the speed of this space shuttle?

6
Problem with single computation statistics -
continued
  • Answer
  • We cant tell. We dont have enough
    information.
  • The same problem arises when using a single
    point computation of investment statistics,

7
Single Point Computation Example
Risk (standard deviation) seems pretty close.
But is it?
8
Is there a story to be told? How can we find out?
  • Answer
  • Roll the time periods. Then we can see trends
    in the data.

9
Concept behind rolling time periods
Window of time otherwise known as window size
Calculate single point of data plot it
Advance Window
Calculate and plot
Advance Window
10
This single point
11
..turns into this when rolled.
Is there a story here? Is something consistently
more volatile?
12
What happens when rolling periods are
changed?36 quarter window advanced annually
Trend still distinct
13
16 quarter rolling window, advanced quarterly
Trend less distinct
14
Eight quarter window, advanced quarterly
Going
15
Six month window advanced quarterly
Going
16
Six month window advanced monthly
Gone!
Is this too sensitive of a time period? Can you
draw any conclusions?
17
So what?
What if you are being told that all three
investment alternative have about the same level
of risk? Is it true?
18
So what about risk?
  • Recall that standard deviation is a common
    measure of risk
  • Low Good?
  • High Bad?
  • Really?

19
Remember what standard deviation is measuring!
Degree of movement from the average
20
Trampoline Thought Experiment
  • Consider the case of two trampolines.
  • Trampoline 1 Soft and yielding.
  • Trampoline 2 Firm and resilient.
  • How can they help to illustrate standard
    deviation?

21
Trampoline Example
Of the two, wouldnt this be the preferred
investment manager?
2
1
Semi standard deviation or downside risk
22
Here is the Trampoline Math
Standard Deviation
23
Assume equal standard deviation. Which investment
is getting riskier? Less risky?
Manager A Risk is Rising
Risk
Manager B Risk is Falling
Time
24
Standard deviation and the current credit crisis
25
Is this the root of the problem?
26
Everything hides in the assumptions!
A physicist, a chemist and an economist are
stranded on an island, with nothing to eat. A can
of soup washes ashore. The physicist says, "Lets
smash the can open with a rock." The chemist
says, "Lets build a fire and heat the can first."
The economist says
27
Lets assume we have a can opener!
28
Are possible small model errors compounding to
result is major disruptions?
Are academic practitioners building financial
models that assume normal distributions?
29
Reality vs. models
The standard statistical approach to risk
management is based on a bell curve or normal
distribution, in which most results are in the
middle and extremes are rare. It is the bell
curve to which investors are referring when they
talk about a nine standard deviation event.
But financial history is littered with bubbles
and crashes, demonstrating that extreme events or
so-called fat tails occur far more often than
the bell curve predicts.
Spooking investors Oct 25th 2007From The
Economist print edition
30
Nine standard deviations? Really?
  • Lets look at a curve that can be considered
    accepted as normal human height
  • Nine deviations from assumed average
  • 1 in 8,900,000,000,000,000,000

Source Nassim Taleb, The Black Swan, pg 231
31
Deal or No Deal? Normal or Not Normal?
?
?
Twenty Year Histogram of Monthly Index Returns
32
If it doesnt fit, you must acquit. - Johnnie
Cochran
The Fatter the distribution tails, the less
reliable the statistics!
  • If the population of price changes is strictly
    normal, on average for any stock..an
    observation more than five standard deviations
    from the mean should be observed about once every
    7,000 years. In fact such observations seem to
    occur about once every three or four years
    Eugene Fama, Journal of Business, January 1965
  • Under the assumption of normal return
    distributions, the probability of the October
    1987 crash was so remote that according to
    efficient market theory it would have been
    virtually impossible Jackwerth and Rubinstein,
    Journal of Finance, Vol 51 1996
  • The problem for traders is that it is much more
    complicated to create models for a world of fat
    tails than for a world of bell curves. As a
    result, traders repeatedly get caught out by
    unprecedented market movements. The collapse of
    two hedge funds, Long-Term Capital Management in
    1998 and Amaranth Advisors in 2006, were cases in
    point The Economist, October 18th 2007.

33
So what?
  • When attempting to evaluate risk, it is
    important to understand that back tested results
    or new products with short performance histories
    may have risks that may be real (and potentially
    significant) but have yet to be experienced.

34
Lets go back to talking about other risk measures
  • Which contains more information?
  • Single point vs. rolling computations
  • Photograph vs. a movie

35
Remember, dont be fooled by single point
computations!
Single point
36
Adjusting Returns for Risk
  • Common Standard
  • Sharpe Ratio

Average Return Risk Free Rate
Standard Deviation of Manager Returns
37
Other Risk Adjusted Return Measures
  • Treynor Ratio
  • Treynor Ratio

Average Return Risk Free Rate
Beta of Manager to Market
38
Other Risk Adjusted Return Measures - continued
  • Sortino Ratio
  • Sortino Ratio

Average Return Risk Free Rate
Downside Deviation
39
Other Risk Adjusted Return Measures - continued
  • Alpha
  • Alpha Difference between actual returns and
    expected returns given a certain level of risk.
    The higher the better.
  • Assumptions include
  • a market risk, as measured by beta is the only
    risk measure needed
  • b R-squared is valid

40
R What?
  • R-Squared
  • Allows a means to measure if you are using an
    appropriate benchmark when evaluating a manager
    or fund. If so, MPT statistics are valid.

To

Not

41
R What? R-Squared Example

Large Growth Benchmark
Large Growth Manager
Russell 1000 Growth Index
Not

Small Value Benchmark
Large Growth Manager
Russell 2000 Value Index
42
R-Squared Where is the validity zone?
70 -75
Below 70
75 - 100


Statistics Unreliable. Tip off is that
statistical results appear strange.
Statistics Valid.
43
Other statistics can be brought together to help
solve the puzzle of investment selection.
Beta
Correlation
Style Drift
Significance Level
Information ratio
Percentile Rank
Up/Down Capture
Volatility of Rank
44
In Summary
  • Many single computation point statistics can be
    misleading as trends are not represented.
  • Using rolling periods can help to identify trends
    in statistics.
  • Data can change significantly depending on the
    time periods used .
  • There are plenty of statistical tools available
    to help in the selection of an investment manager
    or fund.

45
Disclosures
  • Notes
  • 1. Navellier Associates, Inc. is an independent
    investment management firm established in 1987.
    Navellier Associates, Inc. manages a variety of
    equity for primarily U.S. and Canadian
    institutional and retail clients.
  • Data is subject to change over time.
  • Data has been obtained from sources believed to
    be reliable but there is no guarantee of
    completeness or accuracy.
  • None of the information presented herein
    constitutes a recommendation by Navellier or a
    solicitation of any offer to buy or sell any
    securities. INFORMATION PRESENTED IS GENERAL
    INFORMATION THAT DOES NOT TAKE INTO ACCOUNT YOUR
    INDIVIDUAL CIRCUMSTANCES, FINANCIAL SITUATION OR
    NEEDS, NOR DOES IT PRESENT A PERSONALIZED
    RECOMMENDATION TO YOU. Although information has
    been obtained from and is based upon sources
    Navellier believes to be reliable, we do not
    guarantee its accuracy and the information may be
    incomplete or condensed.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com