Title: Surgical Care Improvement Project
1Surgical Care Improvement Project
- Mark A. Wilson, MD, PhD
- Vice-President, Surgery
- VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System
2Objectives
- Define goals and organization of SCIP
- Discuss conceptual basis for SCIP elements
- Review performance measures and current data
- Explore the relevance of process measures to
quality improvement in surgery
3What is SCIP?
- American College of Surgeons
- American Hospital Association
- American Society of Anesthesiologists
- Association of peri-Operative Registered Nurses
- Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
- Centers for Medicare Medicaid Services
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
- Department of Veterans Affairs
- Institute for Healthcare Improvement
- Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare
Organizations
4Why SCIP?
- 69 of adverse events and deaths in healthcare
are related to errors and are thus potentially
preventable. (IOM) - 2.6 of 30 million operations in the US -gt SSI
significant impact on LOS, finances, etc.
http//www.ihi.org/ihi/Topics/PatientSafety/Surgic
alSiteInfections/SurgicalSiteInfectionsCaseForImpr
ovement - 7-8 million operated patients per year with
significant cardiac risk factors and at least 1
million cardiac events annually - Significant risks for perioperative venous
thromboembolism
5SCIP Goal
- To reduce preventable surgical morbidity and
mortality by 25 by 2010 - SCIP constituents believe that Medicare could
annually prevent up to 13,027 perioperative
deaths and 271,055 surgical complications in
major surgical cases by a high level of
compliance with evidence-based processes for
surgical care.
6 Voluntary Reporting Hospitals
Deficit Reduction Act of 2005
7SCIP Modules
- Complication prevention groups
- Surgical infection prevention
- Cardiovascular complication prevention
- Venous thromboembolism prevention
- Respiratory complication prevention
- Specifications Manual http//www.qualitynet.org/d
cs/ContentServer?cid1142976368240pagenameQnetPu
blic2FPage2FQnetTier3cPage
8Surgical Infection Prevention
- SCIP INF 1 Prophylactic antibiotic received
within one hour prior to surgical incision - SCIP INF 2 Prophylactic antibiotic selection for
surgical patients - SCIP INF 3 Prophylactic antibiotics discontinued
within 24 hours after surgery end time (48 hours
for cardiac patients)
9Surgical Infection Prevention - 2
- SCIP INF 4 Cardiac surgery patients with
controlled 6 a.m. postoperative serum glucose - SCIP INF 5 Postoperative wound infection
diagnosed during index hospitalization (Outcome) - SCIP INF 6 Surgery patients with appropriate
hair removal - SCIP INF 7 Colorectal surgery patients with
immediate postoperative normothermia
10Rationale
- Reduction of SSI when tissue levels of
antibiotics are appropriate at time of surgery - No demonstrated benefit to prophylaxis
postoperatively, and higher infection rates if
antibiotics are continued beyond 24 hours - Hyperglycemia contributes to SSI risk
- Shaving pre-operatively increases SSI
- Data to support a reduction of SSI rates when
normothermia is maintained are controversial.
11SCIP 1-3
- 7 case types that are included
- CABG
- Other cardiac
- Colon surgery
- Hip arthroplasty
- Knee arthroplasty
- Hysterectomy
- Vascular surgery
12Evolution of National Performance
National sample of 39,000 Medicare patients
undergoing surgery in US hospitals during 2001.
Bratzler DW, Houck PM, et al. Arch Surg.
2005140174-182.
13National Performance Q3 2007
14 Correct Prophylactic Antibiotic Selection
National VA Data
15Prophylactic Antibiotic Started Timely
National VA Data
16Prophylactic Antibiotics DCd Timely
National VA Data
17National Performance Q3 2007
18Glucose Levels Cardiac Surgery
National VA Data
19Hair Removal By Acceptable Method
20First Temp in Range Colon Surgery
National VA Data
21Colon Surgery Normothermia Postop
National VA Data
22SCIP Modules
- Complication prevention groups
- Surgical infection prevention
- Cardiovascular complication prevention
- Venous thromboembolism prevention
- Respiratory complication prevention
23Cardiovascular Complication Prevention
- SCIP Card 1 Non-cardiac vascular surgery
patients with evidence of coronary artery disease
who received beta-blockers during the
perioperative period - SCIP Card 2 Surgery patients on a beta-blocker
prior to arrival that received a beta-blocker
during the perioperative period - SCIP Card 3 Intra- or postoperative acute
myocardial infarction (AMI) diagnosed during
index hospitalization and within 30 days of
surgery (Outcome)
24Beta Blocker Usage
National VA Data
25Role of Beta Blockers ???
The Lancet 2008 3711839-1847 Effects of
extended-release metoprolol succinate in
patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery (POISE
trial) a randomised controlled trial POISE
Study Group
26POISE Trial
- 190 hospitals, 23 countries
- 8351 patients with, or at risk of ASHD undergoing
non-cardiac surgery - Randomized to double-blinded receipt of extended
release metoprolol or placebo - Started 2-4 hours preop and continued for 30 days
postop - No dosage adjustment
27POISE Trial - Results
MI findings are consistent with prior
trials Hypotension was more common in metoprolol
group.? contributor to stroke and death Would
titration by experienced clinicians decrease CVA
and/or death rates for beta blockers? Patient
criteria for beta blockers and time of initiation
continue to be discussed
28SCIP Modules
- Complication prevention groups
- Surgical infection prevention
- Cardiovascular complication prevention
- Venous thromboembolism prevention
- Respiratory complication prevention
29Venous Thromboembolism
- Leapfrog VTE is the most common preventable
cause of hospital death in the United States. - AHRQ Thromboprophylaxis is the number one
patient safety practice. - American Public Health Association VTE
prophylaxis is a public health crisis. - Guidelines
- American College of Chest Physicians
- Intervention must be tied to risk assessment
- Evolving Joint Commission patient safety goal
30Thromboembolism Prevention
- SCIP VTE 1 Surgery patients with recommended
venous thromboembolism prophylaxis ordered - SCIP VTE 2 Surgery patients who received
appropriate venous thromboembolism prophylaxis
within 24 hours prior to surgery to 24 hours
after surgery - SCIP VTE 3 Intra- or postoperative pulmonary
embolism (PE) diagnosed during index
hospitalization and within 30 days of surgery
(Outcome) - SCIP VTE 4 Intra- or postoperative deep vein
thrombosis (DVT) diagnosed during index
hospitalization and within 30 days of surgery
(Outcome)
31Evolution in National Performance
National Data for All Hospitals
32Appropriate VTE Prophylaxis Ordered
National VA Data
33Received Appropriate VTE Prophylaxis
National VA Data
34VHA Report Card on SCIP
- We concluded that all facilities evaluated
during the CAP reviews implemented strategies to
prevent or reduce the incidence of surgical
infections. .For those measures that were below
VHAs established goals, managers implemented
appropriate action plans to improve performance. - We made no recommendations.
- VHA OIG, Healthcare Inspection, Surgical Quality
Improvement Program, March 2008 - http//www.va.gov/oig/54/reports/VAOIG-07-00773-10
6.pdf
35SCIP Impacts
Outcomes from SIP Overall surgical infection
rate decreased 27, from 2.28 in the first 3
months to 1.65 in the last 3 reporting months.
Dellinger EP, et al. Am J Surg. 2005190915.
36National 30-day All Cause MortalityNon-cardiac
surgery
SCIP Impacts
Limited to all Medicare patients undergoing those
operations included in SCIP.
37Self Analysis
Association of timely administration of
prophylactic antibiotics for major surgical
procedures and surgical site infection.
Hawn MT, Itani KM, Gray SH, et al.
Patients with EPRP SCIP-1 and NSQIP data were
studied Patient and facility level analyses
comparing SCIP-1 and SSI were performed Adjustment
for clustering effects within hospitals,
validation of SSI risk score and procedure type
(percentage of colon, vascular, orthopedic) 9,195
elective procedures (5,981 orthopedic, 1,966
colon, and 1,248 vascular) in 95 VA hospitals.
- J Am Coll Surg. 2008 May206(5)814-9
38- Timely antibiotic administration occurred in
86.4 of patients who had an SSI rate of 4.6
untimely administration was associated with SSI
rate of 5.8 in unadjusted analysis - Patient level risk-adjusted multivariable
generalized estimating equation modeling found
the SSI risk score was predictive of SSI (p lt
0.001) and SIP-1 was not associated with SSI. - Hospital level multivariable linear modeling
found procedure mix (p lt 0.0001), but not SIP-1
rate or facility volume, to be associated with
facility SSI rate. - The study had 80 power to detect a 1.75
difference for patient level SSI rates. - Timely antibiotic administration did not markedly
contribute to overall patient or facility SSI
rates.
39Observations
- Focus on surgical outcomes will continue
- driven largely by financial issues (payer cost
and provider compensation) - the right thing for all of us anyway
- Surgical process measures are increasingly
accepted.data to assess efficacy are needed. - Implications regarding P4P are significant!
- Definition of the processes that are of
sufficient clinical importance to warrant
resource commitment for standardization is
critical
40Some helps
An excellent summary of the background for SCIP
elements http//vaww.visn1.med.va.gov/Estrada.con
fig?resource52620 VA SCIP data http//vaww.oqp.
med.va.gov SCIP sites http//www.qualitynet.org
http//www.medqic.org/scip/ Special thanks to
Dale Bratzler, DO Chair, SCIP Steering
Committee, Oklahoma OIFO for sharing national
SCIP data