Title: Symposium on the Harmonization of Gender Indicators
1Symposium on the Harmonization of Gender
Indicators
- Guaranteeing womens and girls property and
inheritance rights
2Formalising womens property rights can have both
intended and unintended consequences
- We had tongues but we could not speak, we had
feet but we could not walk. Now that we have
land, we have strength to speak and walk. - A poor peasant woman of Bodghaya (India 1987)
- Titling of land is our greatest curse.
- Woman interviewed during land commission hearings
- (Kenya 1993)
3Proposed indicators
- Strategic priority
- Guarantee womens and girls property and
inheritance rights - Proposed indicators
- Land ownership by male, female, or jointly held
- Housing title, disaggregated by male, female, or
jointly held
4Questions about the proposed indicators
- What particular property regime is promoted by
these indicators and, as a consequence, what set
of economic and social relationships, including
those of gender, do they construct? - 2. To what extent do the indicators allow us to
move beyond measurement of formal gender parity
to measuring the quality of any apparent change
towards gender equality? - 3. Are the indicators going to tell us something
meaningful about womens empowerment and
equality, or have the indicators become an end in
themselves?
51. What particular property regime is promoted?
- Questions to consider in formulation of the
Action Plan - Can the indicators be stretched to measure
enjoyment of those property rights that are
meaningful to the poorest women, who are likely
to be homeless and landless, like access to
adequate housing, security of tenure and
usufructory rights? - How can the customary practices that provide land
or housing security for women be retained in the
face of the hegemony of market-oriented
practices? - Can the indicators be expanded to include the
measurement of discrimination against women who
are widowed, divorced, single or marginalized for
other reasons, in the enjoyment of property
rights?
62. To what extent do the indicators allow us to
move beyond measurement of formal gender parity?
- Questions to consider in formulation of the
Action Plan - How could the indicators be supplemented so that
the quality of change in womens formal enjoyment
of property rights is measured? - For example, does ownership enhance womens
bargaining power within households decrease the
prevalence of domestic violence empower women to
make decisions about how the land is managed? Or
does ownership lead to an increase in womens
unpaid domestic/family-related labour?
73. Are the indicators going to tell us something
meaningful?
- Questions to consider in formulation of the
Action Plan - Are there indicators that can draw on data that
is already collected, or that can be more easily
collected? - What qualitative measures could supplement the
quantitative indicators and help to interpret and
deepen our understanding of the quality of the
impact that the indictors measure?
8A human rights approach
- Emphasizes four central principles
- non-discrimination and equality
- participation and empowerment
- accountability
- interdependence and indivisibility of human rights
9non-discrimination and equality
- whether women
- enjoy full and autonomous equality before the
law - have independent access to credit, loans and
social security entitlements - own an equal share of marital property during
marriage and at its dissolution, and are able to
exercise that ownership - are entitled to equal shares in the estate of a
deceased and equal rank in the order of
succession - equally enjoy the right to adequate housing that
is affordable, accessible, habitable, culturally
adequate and has security of tenure, services
available and location - enjoy the protection of effective
anti-discrimination laws that prohibit all forms
of discrimination against women in the enjoyment
of all forms of property rights.
10participation and empowerment
- Indictors suggested
- whether land and housing laws, reforms, policies
and practices have been determined through
meaningful consultation with those women who will
be most affected by them - whether there are education and training programs
that keep women informed about local and national
land and housing issues, and of their related
human rights - whether women are encouraged to pursue economic
opportunities through the formation of womens
self-help groups and cooperatives.
11accountability
- Indictors suggested
- whether effective complaints mechanisms have been
established to monitor womens equal enjoyment of
land and housing rights - whether information and legal literacy programs
for women are available in order to ensure that
women know how to hold the state accountable in
the event that they are unable to enjoy equal
property rights - whether education programs are provided to ensure
that judges, administrative decision-makers,
politicians, local authorities, business men and
women, and others with power, understand their
obligations with respect to womens equal
enjoyment of land and property rights - whether special measures have been adopted to
accelerate the achievement of womens equal
enjoyment of property rights.
12interdependence and indivisibility of human
rights
- Indictors suggested
- whether the state is actively promoting and
supporting the idea of womens equality in the
public and private spheres in all its policies
and practices - whether educational bodies and training programs,
at all levels, use gender-inclusive curriculum - whether the state is implementing laws, policies
and programs to eradicate discrimination against
women in every sphere of life.
13Advantages of a human rights framework
- asserts the importance of womens equality as an
end in itself - emphasizes grass roots empowerment and
participation - links directly with states international legal
obligations - highlights the need for accountability mechanisms.