Tort of Defamation: A Hong Kong Case - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 14
About This Presentation
Title:

Tort of Defamation: A Hong Kong Case

Description:

(Hung Yuen Chan Robert v. Hong Kong Standard Newspapers Ltd.) Facts ... Another officer of Antigua in Hong Kong also sacked for allegedly selling visas ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:237
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 15
Provided by: low2
Category:
Tags: about | case | defamation | facts | hong | kong | tort

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Tort of Defamation: A Hong Kong Case


1
Tort of DefamationA Hong Kong Case
  • By Kenny Wan and Wattie Lo

2
Defamation
  • The tort of defamation is intended to protect a
    persons reputation
  • A personal attack not an attack on goods and
    services
  • Libel and slander
  • Some words have a double meaning, which is called
    innuendo
  • Popular innuendo vs. true innuendo
  • Whether a statement is considered defamatory
    depends on who is reading or hearing that
    statement

3
Parties
(Hung Yuen Chan Robert v. Hong Kong Standard
Newspapers Ltd.)
4
Facts
(Hung Yuen Chan Robert v. Hong Kong Standard
Newspapers Ltd.)
  • Article published in Hong Kong Standard in Sep
    1994, revealing details as follows
  • Paraguay Honorary Consul Sacked
  • Chan Sze-sum, honorary consul of Paraguay in Hong
    Kong, fired following the launch of an
    investigation into an alleged passport scandal
  • Another officer of Antigua in Hong Kong also
    sacked for allegedly selling visas for Antigua to
    Chinese people
  • Plaintiff dismissed from his office as honorary
    vice-consul of Paraguay in Hong Kong one month
    prior to the article published
  • Paraguayan Embassy did not disclose any reasons
    for the removal of both officers

5
Context of Proceedings
(Hung Yuen Chan Robert v. Hong Kong Standard
Newspapers Ltd.)
  • Plaintiff brought action for libel
  • Words such as dismissed and sacked used in
    article were defamatory of him because they
    denoted some kind of misconduct on his part
    leading to his removal from office
  • These also made his explanation that his
    termination was normal procedure false
  • Defendants denied that the article bore any of
    those defamatory meanings

6
Parties Arguments
(Hung Yuen Chan Robert v. Hong Kong Standard
Newspapers Ltd.)
  • Yu QC for plaintiff
  • Natural and ordinary meanings (popular), not
    dictionary meanings (true)
  • Dismissed and sacked must be construed in the
    context of the article as a whole
  • Plaintiffs dismissal not portrayed in a
    different context
  • Innocuous news would not have merited space on
    the front page
  • Huggins QC for defendants
  • Dismissed and sacked carried no connotation
    of misconduct according to their definitions in
    dictionary
  • Article merely reported and notified readers that
    plaintiff was terminated without notice or reason
    and hence defendants were entitled to use those
    words
  • No reason needed to be given for an exercise of
    prerogative by a sovereign government

7
Conclusion and Comments
(Hung Yuen Chan Robert v. Hong Kong Standard
Newspapers Ltd.)
  • Plaintiff was awarded HK700,000
  • Defendants refused to retract or apologise
  • Objective to restore pride and confidence
  • A serious libel against a professional man
  • Hong Kong Standard a well-established English
    newspaper with an average monthly circulation of
    52,000 copies

8
Other points to note
(Hung Yuen Chan Robert v. Hong Kong Standard
Newspapers Ltd.)
  • Repetition rule
  • Repeating somebody elses libellous statement is
    just as bad as making the statement directly
  • Double discovery
  • English newspaper and Chinese newspaper cater for
    different readership

9
Parties
(Hung Yuen Chan Robert v. Sing Tao Ltd.)
  • Plaintiff Robert Chan, a solicitor specialized
    in handling finance and commercial matter
  • Defendant Sing Tao Ltd
  • Robert Whitehead (for defendant)
  • Benjamin Yu (for plaintiff)

10
Facts
(Hung Yuen Chan Robert v. Sing Tao Ltd.)
  • Article published in Sing Tao Daily on 15
    September 1994, appeared on the back page of the
    main part of the newspaper based on the Hong Kong
    Standard article, revealing details as follows
  • ??????????????
  • Chan Sze-sum, honorary consul of Paraguay in Hong
    Kong, fired following the launch of an
    investigation into an alleged passport scandal
  • Another officer of Antigua in Hong Kong also
    sacked for allegedly selling visas for Antigua to
    Chinese people
  • Plaintiff dismissed from his office as honorary
    vice-consul of Paraguay in Hong Kong one month
    prior to the article published
  • Paraguayan Embassy did not disclose any reasons
    for the removal of both officers

11
Context of Proceedings
(Hung Yuen Chan Robert v. Sing Tao Ltd.)
  • Plaintiff brought action for libel
  • Used the words in their natural and ordinary
    meaning the defendants meant and were understood
    to mean that the plaintiff was involved in the
    unlawful or unauthorized selling of passports
    which resulted in his dismissed or sacked from
    the office
  • These also made his explanation that his
    termination was normal procedure false
  • Defendants liability was not disputed and they
    did not defend the wrongfulness but instead
    arguing on the assessment of damages. An apology
    at the beginning of the trial

12
Parties Arguments
(Hung Yuen Chan Robert v. Sing Tao Ltd.)
  • Benjamin Yu QC for plaintiff
  • Evidence given in the first action (vs HK
    Standard) was granted
  • Article based on HK Standard without reasonable
    steps to verify the truthfulness and accuracy
  • Apology was made too late and lacked sincerity
    and failed to attract any meaningful publicity
  • Robert Whitehead for defendants
  • Apologized to the plaintiff for the distress and
    embarrassment caused
  • Understood that the apology was too late but
    hoped to comfort the plaintiff in some way
  • No objection from defendants

13
Conclusion and Comments
(Hung Yuen Chan Robert v. Sing Tao Ltd.)
  • Plaintiff was awarded 900,000
  • Apology from the defendants could not reduced the
    damages especially that the apology was so late
    as to be practically worthless
  • The newspaper (Sing Tao Daily) was a
    well-respected and established Chinese newspaper
    and had a larger circulation than its English
    counterpart (ie. 65,000 vs 52,000 daily)
  • The defendants did not make any reasonable steps
    to verify the truthfulness and accuracy of the
    article

14
Other points to note
(Hung Yuen Chan Robert v. Sing Tao Ltd.)
  • Repetition article was based on other source
    (HK Standard)
  • Double Discovery
  • Compensation to damages should not be duplicated
  • Ensure the target readers of the two newspaper
    were different
  • Compensation was based on the circulation and the
    impact of the damages
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com