Title: Adolescent Englishlanguage Learners: Challenges and Suggested Solutions
1Adolescent English-language Learners Challenges
and Suggested Solutions
- Ramping Up Middle Grades Literacy Forum
- Phoenix, September 28 29, 2006
- Diane August
- Center for Applied Linguistics
2Credits
- Findings of the Adolescent English-Language
Learner Advisory Panel in a soon-to-be-released
report entitled Double the Work Challenges and
Solutions to Acquiring Language and Academic
Literacy for Adolescent English Language Learners - Staff Migration Policy Institute, Center for
Applied Linguistics, and Alliance for Excellent
Education - Support from the Carnegie Corporation of New York
- Aida Walqui at West-Ed for overview slides
3Educational Outcomes Crisis for Adolescent
English-language Learners
- 96 of 8th grade English-language learners scored
below the basic level on NAEP in 2005 (NCES,
2005) - Large discrepancies between English-language
learners and English proficient students on NAEP,
with the mean for 8th grade English-language
learners considerably below the basic level
(Batalova Fix, 2005)see next slide - Only 20 of English-language learners classified
as formerly LEP scored at the proficient or
advanced levels on the reading portion of NAEP
administered in 2005 - English-language learners graduate from high
school at considerably lower rates than students
who are English proficient, 51 compared with 10
who speak English (NCES, 2004)
4Average scores of 8th graders in reading by
English language proficiency and state 2003
Batalova Fix, 2005
5Crisis is Nationwide
- Five states account for over 60 of the
English-language learner population in 6th
through 12th grades California, Texas, New York,
Florida, and Illinois (Batalova Fix, 2005) - However, the states with the fastest growing ELL
population are not the same (Capps, Fix, Murray,
Ost Passel, 2005) - North Carolina500 growth between 1993-2003
- Colorado, Nevada, Nebraska, Oregon, Georgia, and
Indianamore than 200 growth between 1993-2003
6LEP population by state, 2003-2004
Batalova Fix, 2005
7Capps, Fix, Murray, Ost Passel, 2005
8Diversity of the English-language Learner
Population
- While the largest percentage of English-language
learners pre-kindergarten- grade 5 are from
Mexico, other Latin American countries and the
Caribbean55 - 25 are from Asia
- 17 are from Europe, Canada, and Oceania
- 5 are from Africa
- Source Capps, Fix, Murray, Ost Passel, 2005
9Capps, Fix, Murray, Ost Passel, 2005
10Diversity of the English-language Learner
Population
- 57 of adolescent English-language learners were
born in the US and are second or third generation
immigrants (Batalova, Fix, Murray, 2005) - This suggests many English-language learners are
not learning the core content in English despite
many years in US schools
11Diversity of the English-language Learner
Population
- 43 of adolescent English-language learners are
foreign born - Some students arrive in the US with strong first
language literacy skills and content knowledge
while others do not because of poor and
interrupted schooling in their home countries - Even those who enter with strong first language
skills face challenges because they enter when
academic tasks are challenging and there is less
time to acquire academic competence in a second
language
12More LEP adolescents are native than foreign born
Batalova Fix, 2005
13Immigrant Youth are Poor
- Although some adolescent English-language
learners live in middle and upper income families - 59 of adolescent English-language learners live
in families with incomes 185 below the poverty
line compared with 28 of adolescents that speak
English only (Batalova, Fix, Murray, 2005)
14Challenges Facing to Improving the Literacy of
Adolescent English-language Learners
- Lack of common criteria for identifying
English-language learners and tracking their
progress - Lack of appropriate assessments
- Inadequate educator capacity for improving
literacy in English-language learners - Lack of appropriate and flexible program options
- Lack of a strong and coherent research base on
how to build literacy in English-language
learners (federal responsibility)
15Lack of Common Criteria for Identifying
English-language Learners and Tracking their
Progress
- Issues
- States and districts vary widely in their
definition of an English-language learner and
how they determine when these students are
declassified as ELL - Adequate background information on these students
(e.g. age of enrollment in US schools, levels of
first language literacy and content knowledge) is
not collected - English-language learners are not tracked once
they are declassified - Solutions
- Develop a common definition statewide, preferably
linked to student proficiency data establish
common criteria for declassification collect
adequate background information at the district
level, and create systems to track students once
declassified
16Lack of Appropriate Assessments
- Issues
- NCLB requires English-language learners to take
the state math assessment within one year of
arrival in US schools and the reading assessment
by the second year - Although NCLB allows for accommodations including
the use of native language assessments for a
limited amount of time, very few states have
developed accommodated assessments - Very few good assessments of academic language
proficiency Need for good diagnostic assessments
and policies to ensure ELLS receive proper
instruction - Solutions
- Seek examples from other states or develop state
consortia to improve assessment (WIDA consortium)
17Inadequate Educator Capacity for Improving
Literacy in English-language Learners
- Issues
- Very few educators have professional development
for teaching literacy to adolescent
English-language learners, especially within the
context of core academic classrooms - Possible Solutions
- Updating state teacher certification requirements
so all credentialed teachers are capable of
working with ELLS - Requiring districts with large number of ELLS to
provide meaningful, ongoing professional
development for teachers in how best to serve
these students in content area instruction - Providing specific training for coaches in how to
develop literacy in English-language learners
18Lack of Appropriate and Flexible Program Options
- Issues
- It is a myth that most adolescent
English-language learners can learn core content
in a second language in two years - Possible Solutions
- Provide various instructional models depending on
local context to ensure students learn academic
content bilingual programs, sheltered English
programs, or newcomer programs - Provide flexible pathways
- Allot extra instructional time through extending
the school year or school day - Allow students to take more than 4 years to
complete high school - Provide flexible scheduling so students can work
as they study