Summative Assessment: Rubrics and Tests - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 52
About This Presentation
Title:

Summative Assessment: Rubrics and Tests

Description:

Identify attributes of effective test questions ... Avoid trivia items. Match items to learning outcomes. Each item has an agreed upon correct answer ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:165
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 53
Provided by: defau316
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Summative Assessment: Rubrics and Tests


1
Summative AssessmentRubrics and Tests
  • Effective Teaching and Learning
  • Baker College

2
Outcomes
  • Apply a systematic process for creating a test
    blueprint
  • Identify attributes of effective test questions
  • Explain the advantages and disadvantages of
    different types of test questions
  • Assess the quality of tests and test items
  • Create samples of effective questions

3
What type of assessment?
  • Procedural knowledge
  • Declarative knowledge

4
Test Writing Process
  • Planning the test
  • Writing test items
  • Selecting test items
  • Formatting the test
  • Assessing the test
  • Revising the test
  • Using the test
  • After the test

5
Planning the Test
  • Content Blueprint
  • Learning outcomes
  • Weight
  • Length
  • Types of items
  • Number of items

6
Test Blueprint
7
Types of Items
  • Recognition
  • True-false
  • Multiple-choice
  • Multiple-answer
  • Matching
  • Ordering
  • Recall
  • Short Answer
  • Completion
  • Essay

8
Average Response Time
9
Writing Test Items
  • Simple and direct wording
  • Avoid jargon
  • Avoid trivia items
  • Match items to learning outcomes
  • Each item has an agreed upon correct answer
  • Write more questions than you will need

10
Multiple-choice Items
  • Stem
  • Direct question
  • Incomplete statement
  • Responses
  • One correct answer
  • Multiple distracters

11
Stem
  • Clearly worded
  • One idea
  • Avoid the use of negatives
  • Enough information to answer the question
  • Direct questions preferred
  • Blanks at the end of the stem
  • Include words repeated in all responses

12
Responses
  • 3-5 per item
  • Avoid all of the above and none of the above
  • Grammatically correct with stem
  • Similar length and structure
  • Avoid absolute words
  • Listed in a logical order
  • Mutually exclusive and not overlapping

13
Distracters
  • Plausible
  • Common misconceptions
  • Logical misinterpretations
  • Clichés
  • Partial answers
  • Technical terms or jargon

14
Example
  • What is the minimum number of responses for a
    multiple-choice item?
  • A) 2
  • B) 3
  • C) 4
  • D) 5

15
Application Example
  • What problem exists in the following
    multiple-choice stem
  • ________ is the most common type of test item.
  • Absolute words should be avoided in the stem.
  • The stem contains more than one idea or concept.
  • Not enough information is presented to answer the
    question.
  • The fill-in the blank should come at the end.

16
Analysis and Evaluation Example Stem
An instructor was asked the following question
"Briefly list and explain how you develop a
test. As an answer, this instructor wrote the
following I begin by going through the chapter
and writing questions based on the material in
the text and my lectures. Then I decide how many
questions I want and select the best questions
from the list that I have developed. I format the
test and add instructions. After a few days, I
review the questions and make any revisions that
need to be done and remove any jargon or wording
lifted directly from the text. Then I use the
test in class. Based on how the class does, I may
make changes for the next time I teach the class.
17
Analysis and Evaluation Example Responses
  • Based on the process described in Effective
    Classroom Tests, how would you judge this
    answer?
  • A) EXCELLENT (all steps in the right order with
    correct, clear, and complete descriptions)
  • B) GOOD (all stages correct in the right order,
    but the descriptions are not as complete as they
    should be).
  • C) MEDIOCRE (one or two stages are missing, OR
    the stages are in the wrong order, OR the
    explanations are not complete, OR the
    explanations are irrelevant)
  • D) UNACCEPTABLE (one or more stages are missing
    AND the explanations are not complete AND/OR they
    are irrelevant)

18
Poor Question 1
  • Good multiple choice items
  • A) are easy to write
  • B) can only test memorized content
  • C) are better than essay items
  • D) there is no such thing
  • E) can test a wide range of content

19
Poor Question 2
  • Which of the following characteristics is not
    true of completion test items but is an important
    distinguishing attribute of matching tests,
    multiple-choice questions, and true-false items?
  • A) They are objective test items.
  • B) They require knowledge recognition but not
    production.
  • C) Much more difficult to construct.

20
Poor Question 3
  • Which of the following statements is FALSE?
  • A) Misfeasance is the improperly doing of an
    illegal act.
  • B) Nonfeasance is improperly doing a legal act.
  • C) Nonfeasance is the failure to do an act that
    one must do legally.
  • D) Misfeasance is the failure to PROPERLY do an
    act that one has a duty to perform.
  • E) None of the above.

21
Poor Question 4
  • __________ is/are the best method to determine if
    students have learned something.
  • A) Comprehensive Exam
  • B) Homework Assignments
  • C) Pop Quizzes
  • D) Research Paper

22
Selecting Test Items
  • Outcome Weight x Questions by Type Questions
    of Each Type for Outcome

23
Formatting the Test
  • Group items by type
  • Sort items by increasing difficulty
  • Add instructions
  • Review layout and pagination
  • Write answer key

24
Assessing the Test
  • Self
  • 2-3 days after writing the test
  • Clarity
  • Clues in items to other items
  • Non-expert
  • Clarity
  • Contextual clues
  • Peer
  • Content
  • Weighting to outcomes
  • Answer key
  • Students
  • Clarity
  • Content

25
Test Taking Procedures
  • Use of notes or other materials
  • Time limits

26
After the Test
  • Item Analysis
  • Areas for review
  • Test revisions

27
Activity
  • Write two test questions on any topic
  • One question should be an example of a good test
    item
  • One question should be an example of a poorly
    written test item

28
Share
  • Share your two questions with a partner
  • Can they determine which is good and which is
    bad?
  • Can they explain what makes one poorly written?
  • As a team, how can you fix the poorly written
    questions?

29
Intermission
30
Outcomes
  • Determine what characteristics are important in
    evaluating student work
  • Evaluate rubrics, analytic scales, and other
    evaluation methods
  • Describe the contents of a good rubric
  • Identify rubrics already in use at Baker College
  • Begin work on a rubric for a class

31
What is a Rubric?
  • A rubric is a scoring tool or guide that lists
    the specific criteria and the ranges for multiple
    levels of achievement for a piece of work or
    performance. A rubric consists of a set of
    well-defined factors and criteria describing the
    dimensions of an assignment to be assessed or
    evaluated.

32
Parts of a Rubric
  • Scale (columns)
  • Dimensions (rows)
  • Criteria descriptions (cells)

33
Benefits of Rubrics
  • Communicates the instructors expectations
  • Streamlines the process for feedback to the
    student
  • Facilitates equitable grading
  • Standardizes assessment across different
    instructors

34
Uses for Rubrics
  • Papers
  • Presentations
  • Projects
  • Essays
  • Homework
  • Case Studies
  • Participation/Class Discussion
  • Portfolios

35
Types of Rubrics
  • Analytic
  • Page 11
  • Holistic
  • Page 12 and 13
  • Check List
  • Page 14
  • Scoring Guide
  • Page 15

36
Creating a Rubric
  • Identify components/outcomes of the assignment
  • Determine a scale
  • Add criteria
  • Assign points
  • Set component weights (optional)
  • Assess the rubric
  • Test and revise

37
Activity
  • Split into groups of 3-4
  • Determine team roles
  • Select an assignment that needs a rubric
  • Can be a specific assignment, such as a research
    paper for ENG 102
  • Can be of a more general nature such as a class
    presentation

38
Step 1 Identify Components
  • List 5 major objectives/outcomes of the
    assignment
  • Write these items as the row headers of the sheet
    provided

39
Step 2 Determine a Scale
  • Aim for 3-5 levels
  • Can use an odd or even number of items
  • Use the headings on the next slide for ideas
  • Write these as column headings on the sheet
    provided

40
Potential Column Headings
  • Outstanding Accomplished Proficient
    Developing Beginning
  • Accomplished Average Developing Beginning
  • Excellent Good Needs Improvement
    Unsatisfactory
  • Exceptional Acceptable Marginal
    Unacceptable
  • Expert Practitioner Apprentice Novice
  • Professional Adequate Needs Work Youre
    Fired
  • Exceeds Expectation On Target Beginning
  • Exemplary Competent Developing
  • High Medium Low
  • Outstanding Proficient Shows Potential

41
Step 3 Add Criteria
  • Create descriptions for each level of performance
    for each criteria in the cells of the rubric
  • Bullet points
  • Paragraphs
  • Write these criteria in the cells of the sheet
    provided

42
Step 4 Assign Points
  • Assign points for each level of performance
  • Can use either of the following
  • Discrete values (5, 4, 3, 2, 1)
  • Ranges (10-9) for each level
  • Indicate the point value on the sheet provided
  • Normally placed with the scale

43
Step 5 Set Component Weights
  • Allows for different levels of importance
  • Spelling/grammar more or less important than
    content?
  • Determine if weights are necessary for your
    rubric
  • Assign weights accordingly
  • See example on page 17-18 of the handout

44
Step 6 Assess the Rubric
  • Assess your rubric using a metarubric
  • See examples on page 11-15 of your handout
  • Conduct a peer review
  • Ask one or two other instructors to review your
    rubric
  • Provide time for student review
  • Allow students to ask questions and make comments

45
Group Project
  • Trade rubrics with another group
  • Assess the rubric using a metarubric from page
    11-15

46
Discussion
  • What metarubric(s) did you use? Why?
  • What did you see on the other teams rubric that
    you liked?
  • Could you understand the assignment easily by
    reviewing the rubric?

47
Step 7 Implement and refine
  • Refine your rubric based on feedback from other
    instructors and students
  • Make notes each time you use the rubric for
    continuous improvement purposes
  • Share with others

48
Rubric Reliability Validity
  • Reliability
  • the likelihood that a given measurement
    procedure will yield the same description of a
    given phenomena if the measurement is repeated.
  • Validity
  • the extent to which a specific measurement
    provides data that relate to commonly accepted
    meanings of a particular concept.
  • Babbie, 1986

49
Reliability Requires
  • Instructor should reach same conclusion each time
  • Different instructors should reach similar
    conclusion (interrater reliability)

50
Interrater Reliability
  • Independently score a set of student samples
  • Review responses for consistent and inconsistent
    responses
  • Discuss and reconcile inconsistencies
  • Repeat with second group of samples
  • Maki, 2004, p. 127

51
Validity Requires
  • Reliability
  • Comprehensiveness
  • Cover all outcomes
  • Economy
  • Space is usually limited, so be selective about
    what goes into the rubric
  • Balanced scoring and weighting

52
Discussion and Questions
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com