Title: Conducting a Compliance Audit
1Conducting a Compliance Audit
- UTSA Compliance Audit Team Orientation
- May , 2007
- Gerry Dizinno, Co-Chair
2SACS/COC Reaffirmation
- Two Components
- Quality Enhancement Plan (QEP)
- Compliance Certification
3QEP
- A plan must be developed that
- Focuses on improving student learning
- Involves members of the university community in
determining the topic - Flows from our internal planning processes
- Includes recognition of best practices
- Includes a detailed evaluation/assessment plan
- Includes a detailed budget and assignment of
responsibility for carrying out the plan - Think of it as similar to a grant application
that focuses on improving student learning
4Compliance Certification
- Compliance Certification Report submitted about 6
months prior to scheduled visit for us that
means August or September 2009 - We provide a judgments of the extent of
compliance with Core Requirements and
Comprehensive standards - Certification by chief executive officer and
accreditation liaison that the document is
truthful, accurate, and complete. - Report provides evidence of compliance i.e.,
EXTENSIVE documentation required - BEFORE the work is done on the Report, we will
conduct a Compliance Audit
5SACS Compliance Requirements
- Compliance with the Section 1 The Principle of
Integrity - Compliance with Section 2 Core Requirements (16)
- Compliance with Section 3 Comprehensive
Standards (68) - Institutional Mission (1)
- Governance and Administration (17)
- Institutional Effectiveness (1)
- Programs
- All Educational Programs (12)
- Undergraduate Programs (4)
- Graduate and Post-Baccalaureate Programs (4)
- Faculty (5)
- Library and Other Learning Resources (3)
- Student Affairs and Services (3)
- Resources
- Financial Resources (5)
- Physical Resources (3)
- Commission Policies (3)
- Federal Requirements (7)
6Steps in Completing the Compliance Report
Step 0 Conduct Compliance Audit We are doing
this BEFORE the remaining steps
- Organize the effort and provide training
- Develop draft narratives and evidence
- Edit materials
- Obtain approvals
- Prepare printed and electronic documents
- Obtain final sign-off by SACS Liaison and
President - Send electronic and hard copies to SACS
7Step 0 Purposes of the Compliance Audit
- Determine where we are regarding compliance make
a judgment - Definitely In Compliance all documentation
identified and located - Probably In Compliance not all documentation
identified and located - Compliance In Question processes, procedures may
not be in place and/or documentation unavailable
or not located - Probably Not In Compliance process and/or
procedures may not be completely in place and
documentation may be unavailable - Definitely Not In Compliance processes and/or
procedures not in place and documentation is not
available
8Two Most Important Purposes of Compliance Audit
- To identify policies, procedures, practices,
programs, etc., etc. that we will need to CHANGE
in order to come into compliance. - To produce information that can be used by the
Compliance Report Team in preparing the
Compliance Report.
9Example of Summary of Results to be presented to
Leadership Team/CMO
10Our Compliance Audit Team
- Co-Chairs Gerry Dizinno, Pam Bacon
- Presidents Areas
- Presidents Office Dick Dawson
- General Counsel Gail Jensen
- Academic Affairs
- Institutional Effectiveness and Assessment
Steve Wilkerson - College Representatives (for consultation and
assistance with faculty affairs and academic
program issues) - COA Bob Baron
- COB Dan Hollas, Bennie Wilson
- COE Mehdi Shadaram
- COEHD Art Hernandez
- COLFA Chris Wickham
- COPP Mitch Miller
- COS Dmitry Gokhman
- Honors Ann Eisenberg
- Faculty Affairs David Johnson, Elaine Sanders
- Undergraduate Studies Amir Karimi
- Graduate Studies Veronica Ramirez
- Information Technology Bill Angrove
11Determining Compliance Status
- You must carefully analyze each Core Requirement
and Comprehensive Standard - Many are complex statements with separate phrases
or words that each will require documentation - Prime Example Core Requirement 2.5
Institutional Effectiveness - The institution engages in ongoing, integrated,
and institution-wide research based planning and
evaluation processes that (1) incorporate a
systematic review of institutional mission,
goals, and outcomes (2) result in continuing
improvement in institutional quality and (3)
demonstrates the institution is effectively
accomplishing its mission. - So, there are actually 7 components to this Core
Requirement! - So, they must be read carefully and appropriate
documentation located to support compliance
12Another Example
- 3.2.11 The institutions chief executive officer
has ultimate responsibility for, and exercises
appropriate administrative and fiscal control
over, the institutions intercollegiate athletics
program. - So, 3 separate aspects must be documented!
13Another Example
- 3.9.1 The institution publishes a clear and
appropriate statement of student rights and
responsibilities and disseminates the statement
to the campus community. - Three aspects!
14Documents to Aid You in Making Decisions
- Principles of Accreditation Foundations for
Quality Enhancement (Interim Edition, December
2006) - Resource Manual for the Principles of
Accreditation most helpful, in my opinion! - Handbook for Reaffirmation of Accreditation
15Division of Labor
- Each of you has received a listing of the Core
Requirements and Comprehensive Standards for
which you are responsible - Representatives from the Colleges will serve as
consultants to those in Academic Affairs
regarding issues of academic policy, practices,
faculty issues, etc.
16How We Will Report on Each Requirement and
Standard
- Rating Sheet asks you to determine
- Definitely In Compliance
- Probably In Compliance
- Compliance In Question
- Probably Not In Compliance
- Definitely Not In Compliance
- Also provide a BRIEF summary of basis upon which
decision is made and description of what needs to
be done to bring institution into compliance - To be Definitely In Compliance we need to have
BOTH the processes, programs, etc. AND the
documentation supporting those available we are
NOT IN COMPLIANCE without documentation!!!!
17Lets Briefly Review EACH Core Requirement and
Comprehensive Standard
- Refer to printed hand-out (Compliance Audit
Responsibilities) AND the Resource Manual for
the Principles of Accreditation that was sent to
you
18Assignments Core Requirements
- 2.1 through 2.3 Dick Dawson and Gail Jensen
- 2.4 through 2.6 Steve Wilkerson
- 2.7.1 and 2.7.4 Sally Bench
- 2.7.2 Amir Karimi and Veronica Ramirez
- 2.7.3 Amir Karimi
- 2.8 Elaine Sanders
- 2.9 David Johnson
- 2.10 Gail Carbajal
- 2.11.1 and 2.11.2 Janet Parker
19Assignments for Comprehensive StandardsInstituti
onal Mission, Governance Administration
- 3.1.1 Steve Wilkerson
- 3.2.1 through 3.2.6 Dick Dawson and Gail Jensen
- 3.2.7 through 3.2.10 Barbara Baran-Centeno
- 3.2.11 Dick Dawson and Gail Jensen
- 3.2.12 and 3.2.13 Dick Dawson, Gail Jensen,
Craig Evans - 3.2.14 Dick Dawson and Gail Jensen
20Assignments for Comprehensive StandardsInstituti
onal Effectiveness
21NOTE For Sections 3.4 (All Educational
Programs), 3.5 (Undergraduate Programs), 3.6
(Graduate Programs), and 3.7 (Faculty)The
College Representatives will assist the person(s)
in charge of compiling information as it pertains
to their college
22Assignments for Comprehensive StandardsApplying
to ALL Educational Programs
- 3.4.1 and 3.4.11 Amir Karimi and Veronica
Ramirez - 3.4.2 Bob McKinley
- 3.4.3 George Norton and Veronica Ramirez
- 3.4.4, 3.4.6 and 3.4.8 Sally Bench and Veronica
Ramirez - 3.4.5, 3.4.7, 3.4.9 and 3.4.10 David Johnson
- 3.4.12 Bill Angrove
23Assignments for Comprehensive StandardsApplying
to Undergraduate Programs ONLY
- 3.5.1 Steve Wilkerson
- 3.5.2 Sally Bench
- 3.5.3 Amir Karimi
- 3.5.4 Elaine Sanders
24Assignments for Comprehensive StandardsApplying
ONLY to Graduate/Post-Baccalaureate Programs
- 3.6.1 through 3.6.4 Veronica Ramirez and
College Representatives
25Assignments for Comprehensive Standards Faculty
- 3.7.1 3.7.5 Elaine Sanders
26Assignments for Comprehensive Standards Library
Other Learning Resources
- 3.8.1 through 3.8.3 David Johnson
27Assignments for Comprehensive Standards Student
Affairs Services
- 3.9.1 and 3.9.3 Gail Carbajal
- 3.9.2 Sally Bench
28Assignments for Comprehensive Standards
Financial Resources
- 3.10.1 and 3.10.2 Janet Parker and Candie
Sagehorn - 3.10.3 through 3.10.5 Janet Parker
29Assignments for Comprehensive Standards Physical
Resources
- 3.11.1 through 3.11.3 Janet Parker
30Assignments for Comprehensive Standards
Adherence to Commission Policies
- 3.12 through 3.14.1 Gerry Dizinno
31Assignments for Comprehensive Standards Federal
Requirements
- 4.1 Steve Wilkerson
- 4.2 and 4.4 Amir Karimi, Veronica Ramirez and
College Representatives - 4.3 Sally Bench
- 4.5 Gail Carbajal
- 4.6 George Norton and Veronica Ramirez
- 4.7 Janet Parker
32Assignments by individual are provided in handout
33Schedule of Activities
- May 10th Orientation of Compliance Audit Team
- June 1st First Progress Report Due (see report
format provided to you) - July 1st Second Progress Report Due
- August 1st Third Progress Report Due
- August 15th Draft of Final Report Due
- August 31st Final Report Completed
- September 2007 through Summer 2009 Completion of
Compliance Report
34Other Issues
- Additional meetings
- I will be available for individual meetings if
necessary - You will need to involve others
- College representatives should be prepared to
assist others in gathering documentation and
making decisions regarding academic programs,
policies, and procedures - If you need assistance in getting the cooperation
of any other individuals, let me know and I will
work with you, Sandy Welch, the Provost, and the
President to ensure that you get the information
you need