A Population Study of Small Mouth Bass Using Mark - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 22
About This Presentation
Title:

A Population Study of Small Mouth Bass Using Mark

Description:

Stocked in 1984 with bluegill, small-mouth bass, and channel catfish. Average depth 14-20 feet. Currently 6 feet below average water level. Facts About Small ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:118
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 23
Provided by: bella8
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: A Population Study of Small Mouth Bass Using Mark


1
A Population Study of Small Mouth Bass Using Mark
Recapture Technique
  • Presented by
  • Brian D. Beauerle
  • Curran W. Wilkinson

2
The Beauerle Pondin Bardstown, KY
3
Background on the Pond
  • Made in 1981
  • Stocked in 1984 with bluegill, small-mouth bass,
    and channel catfish
  • Average depth 14-20 feet
  • Currently 6 feet below average water level

4
Facts About Small Mouth Bass
  • Average Length is between 10-20 in.
  • Average weight is between 1-5 lbs.
  • Cold-blooded schooling fish
  • Prefer to be near bottom, where they feed on
    minnows, crayfish, and insects

5
THE EXPERIMENT
6
Background on the Experiment
  • Three sample collections were performed the
    initial on 10/23, the following samples on
    11/13, 11/20 respectively
  • Bait used artificial night-crawlers
  • Fish were marked with clothespin-like tag
    inserted into flesh of lower lip
  • All captured fish were marked for each sample
    also measured for approximate length

7
Overview of Mark Recapture Models
  • I. Closed population models
  • a) Two samples - Lincoln-Peterson Estimator
  • b) Several samples (kgt2) - Schnabel Estimator
  • Assume no recruitment or losses during period
    of study

II. Open population models a) Jolly-Seber
Model (based on kgt2) Population size and
composition changes due to births, deaths,
and migration
8
Schnabel Equation
  • N ?(Mtnt)/((? mt)1)
  • where
  • nt of individuals caught in sample t
  • mt already marked when caught in sample t
  • Mt marked just before the tth sample
  • variance of N is a function of recaptures,
    therefore precision
  • of the estimate is increased by increasing nt
    and Mt

9
Fundamental Assumptions of the Schnabel Estimator
  • The population is closed (geographically and
    demographically)
  • All animals are equally likely to be captured in
    each sample
  • Capture and marking do not affect catchability
  • Each sample is random
  • Marks are not lost between sampling occasions

10
THE RESULTS
11
Results of Sample Collections
  • Initial Collection (Oct. 23rd)
  • Twenty fish were caught and tagged
  • Second Collection (Nov. 13th)
  • Eleven fish were caught, 3 of which were
  • previously marked from the initial collection.
  • Third Collection (Nov. 20th)
  • Sixteen fish were caught, 4 of which were
  • previously marked (2 from initial, 2 from Second)

12
Analysis of Fish Distribution
13
Fish Length Data
14
Size of Small Mouth Bass
15
Discussion/Conclusions
  • The average length of captured fish was 10.44 in.
  • Using the Schnabel equation, the estimated small
    mouth bass population (N) was calculated to be
    90.
  • The calculated population size is only a very
    rough estimate. Factors that can affect this
    estimate include number of samples analyzed,
    weather, water temperature, etc.
  • Most importantly, we have concluded without a
    shadow of a doubt that Brian is a better
    fisherman than Curran!

16
JUST FOR FUN
17
Two Talented Fishermen
18
Trouble with the Pole
19
Incognito Strategy
  • Curran out-smarts even the brightest fish

20
Draining the Weasel
  • Sometimes you just
  • have to go!!!!

21
Draining a Bigger Weasel
  • Following Brians
  • example

22
THE END
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com