Measuring Effects of Sprawl - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 15
About This Presentation
Title:

Measuring Effects of Sprawl

Description:

Attended the Humboldt University in Berlin, Germany. ... Beyond Sprawl: New patterns of growth to fit the new California (BofA study) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:34
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 16
Provided by: bssS7
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Measuring Effects of Sprawl


1
Measuring Effects of Sprawl
  • Michael Jacinto
  • 09 May 1999

2
Michael Jacinto
  • SFSU senior, Urban Studies / German.
  • Attended the Humboldt University in Berlin,
    Germany.
  • Planning summer internship in Cincinnati, OH in
    community development.
  • The purpose of the following research to measure
    the effects of sprawl caused by suburban
    development.

3
Literature Review
  • Barnett, Johnathan The Fractured Metropolis.
    Harper Collins, 1996.
  • Lang, Peter Suburban Discipline. Princeton Arch.
    Press, 1997.
  • Calthorpe, Peter The Next American Metropolis.
    Princeton Arch. Press, 1993.
  • Kunstler, James The Geography of Nowhere.
    Touchstone Books, 1994.
  • Langdon, Philip Reshaping the American Suburb.
    Univ. of Mass. Press, 1997.
  • Congress for New Urbanism, www.cnu.org
  • American Planning Assoc, www.mnapa.com
  • Greenbelt Alliance, www.rahul.net/gba
  • Planners Web, www.plannersweb.com
  • Sprawlbusters, www.sprawl-busters.com

4
Research ProblemMeasuring effects of sprawl
  • What are the current effects of sprawl?
  • Form and configuration of suburbs.
  • Ecological, economical, sociological effects.
  • Ostracism, especially for teenagers.
  • What are the solutions to sprawl?
  • New Urbanism Approach.
  • Government Funding for open space preservation.
  • Examples of new developments
  • Disneys Celebration
  • Seaside, FL.

5
How Do You Define Sprawl?
  • Noted policy analyst Anthony Downs, identified
    ten "traits" associated with sprawl
  • unlimited outward extension,
  • low-density residential and commercial
    settlements
  • leapfrog development
  • fragmentation of powers over land use among many
    small localities
  • dominance of transportation by private automotive
    vehicles
  • no centralized planning or control of land-uses
  • widespread strip commercial development
  • great fiscal disparities among localities
  • segregation of types of land uses in different
    zones
  • reliance mainly on the trickle-down or filtering
    process to provide housing to low-income
    households

6
Washingtons response
  • Livability Goals
  • Green spaces, clean air and clean water, sustain
    wildlife, and provide families with places to
    walk, play and relax.
  • Ease traffic congestion, strengthening existing
    transportation systems, and expand use of
    alternative transportation.
  • Restore a sense of community by fostering citizen
    and private sector involvement.
  • Develop regional growth strategies and address
    common.
  • Enhance economic competitiveness promote
    cutting-edge industries.
  • Fiscal Year 2000 Funding
  • Better America Bonds9.5 billion. Tax credits
    totaling more than 700 mill. over 5 years.
  • Regional Connections Initiative HUD to provide
    50mill in matching funds to design pursue
    smarter growth strategies

7
Results from prior research

8
Research Objectives and Hypotheses
  • Research Objectives
  • To examine the effects of sprawl on peoples
    sense of place, community, and environment.
  • To evaluate the ecological effects of sprawling
    development.
  • To research the social factors relating to sprawl
  • Research Hypotheses
  • Citizens lack a connection to their communities
    due to a deficient infrastructure.
  • Market trends have not allowed for any
    alternative developments.
  • Current social ills, once thought of as
    Inner-city problems stem from, and are present
    in, sprawling suburbs.

9
Research Methods
  • Survey Instrument (Mailed)
  • Telephone Surveys
  • Case Studies
  • Archival Research
  • Participant Observation

10
The Survey Instrument
  • 1,850 surveys to be mailed to residents of
    Fremont, California.
  • Sample amounts to 1 of population.
  • Survey consists of 50 questions 20 Likert scale,
    20 opinion, 10 open-ended.
  • Surveys are confidential.

11
The Telephone Interview
  • 200 residents selected randomly by CATI system.
  • Telephone interviews consist of scaled down
    questions from mail survey (15).
  • Target population Antioch, CA.
  • Average length of interview 15 minutes.

12
Case Studies
  • Examine master plans for the following cities
  • Los Angeles
  • San Francisco
  • Portland
  • Minneapolis / St. Paul
  • St. Louis

13
Archival Research
  • Statistical analysis of US census data.
  • Longitudinal Studies for the San Francisco
    Metropolitan Statistical Area.
  • Consulted ABAGs Bay Area Alliance for
    Sustainable Development Survey.
  • Beyond Sprawl New patterns of growth to fit the
    new California (BofA study)

14
Participant Observation
  • Community Development Design Center
    Cincinnati, OH.
  • Focus Neighborhood community development and
    renewal.
  • Purpose Inner-city suburbs (ex. Over the Rhine)
    as areas to carefully renew and revitalize.
  • Modus Special attention given to existing
    social/economic standing, seek to preserve and
    improve environment, not to gentrify.

15
danke schoen
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com