Title: Government and the Distribution of Income 1
1Government and the Distribution of Income 1
- PADM 625
- Economics of Public Policy
- Ben Muse
2Topics
- Measures of income distribution
- Changes in U.S. income distribution
- Alternative measures of change
- Some explanation
- Efficiency and equity arguments for government
intervention - A note on poverty
3You are not responsible for
- Last two sentences on page 207 to end of first
paragraph on page 209 (diagrammatic analysis of
public good argument) - Social welfare function discussion from page 214
through Edgeworth discussion on page 218 (but
read box 7.2)
4Three ways of measuring inequality in the size
distribution of income
- (Quintiles, the Lorenz curve, and the Gini
coefficient)
5Quintile shares
- Rank the population by income
- Divide the population into five equal groups
- These groups are quintiles each containing a
fifth of the population - Report the share of total income received by each
quintile
6Household shares of aggregate income
7The Lorenz Curve
- A graphic device for illustrating the
distribution of income - Horizontal axis cumulative percentage of the
number of households ranked according to income - Vertical axis cumulative percentage of income
received by families
8Using text data, Table 7.1, page 196
9The straight line shows equal distribution of
income
10The curved line shows an unequal distribution of
income
1150 of the families may have less than 50 of the
income
12(No Transcript)
13The Gini coefficient measures the difference
between the lines
14Ratio of the yellow area to the yellowgreen
15Gini coefficient values
- If the income distribution is perfectly equal
(each family has the same income) the two lines
coincide the Gini coefficient is zero - If the income distribution were perfectly unequal
(one family as all income) the Gini coefficient
is one
16Is income inequality increasing in the U.S.?
17Household shares of aggregate income
18(No Transcript)
19(No Transcript)
20What does the graph show?
- Begins to fall in the mid-1930s
- Falls dramatically in the later 1930s and WWII
- Fall continues to late 1960s
21What does the graph show?
- Inequality was very high in the early years of
the century - Rose and peaked in the great depression (about
1931-32)
22(No Transcript)
23What does the graph show?
- Then begins long sustained rise
- Through the 1970s, 1980s and early 1990s
24A note on numbers
- Reasonably good information since WWII
- Fragmentary information before
- These authors made estimates of earlier values
25(No Transcript)
26Interpreting the U.S. distributional facts
27Do people stay in the same quintiles all their
lives?
- Even if had same ability and opportunity
- Incomes would vary
- People value different things
- Incomes tend to vary over the life-cycle
- Random chance and variation
28(No Transcript)
29Measures of economic mobility
- Treasury study no more than a third of taxpayers
in the lowest quintile in 1979 were in the lowest
quintile in 1988 - Urban Institute over 60 of persons were in a
different family quintile after ten year periods
beginning in 1967 and 1977
30Income mobility
- Census Bureau Year to year changes in family
income to poverty ratio (IPR - income divided by
the poverty threshold). - Between 1994 and 1995, IPR decreased by more than
5 for 36.8 or persons and increased by more
than 5 for 40.5 of persons
31Income mobility and Gini
- Since incomes change over time
- Measured inequality over longer periods is
smaller - Gini coefficients are almost 8 smaller over
seven year period than a one year period
32Alternative income measures
- Census official cash income before taxes,
including cash transfers received from government
like social security and welfare - Census comprehensive adds to this capital gains
income, noncash govt transfers and imputed
return on homeowners equity
33Alternative income measures
- CBO adjusted family income (AFI) family
comprehensive income divided by poverty threshold
(IPR) for family with similar characteristics.
34Alternative income distribution measures
35Consumption inequality
- Is consumption a better measure of welfare than
income? - Lower income quintiles tend to spend more on
consumption that their incomes - Unreported income, gifts, running down savings
36Wealth inequality
- Is net worth a better measure of welfare than
income? - Net worth assets - liabilities
- Allows a household to maintain consumption when
income fluctuates - financial independence
37Consumption and wealth
38International comparisons
- International comparisons of income inequality
are dicey - requiring care to use comparable definitions
across countries - Luxembourg Income Study is a good source
- U.S. appears less equal than other industrial
countries
39(No Transcript)
40Theres a lot to explain here
41Theres a lot to explain here
- Economists hold different views about what causes
these shifts in income inequality
42Distribution of income depends on supply and
demand
- for productive services
- not an endorsement
- but a way of thinking about the subject
43Distribution of income depends on
- prior distribution of wealth
- physical and financial assets
- but human capital as well
44Human capital is most important
- Capital is a produced good used to produce future
goods - By analogy we could talk about investing in
human capital
45Investment in human capital
- Education, of course
- Investment in health
- Parental example, culture
46In fact,
- Human capital is extremely important
- Wages and salaries are much larger than dividends
and retained earnings
47Personal income(billions of dollars)
48(No Transcript)
49(No Transcript)
50So...
- Labor income is about 73 of total income
- Percent doesnt vary much
- Inequality in income distribution
- Is going to be heavily dependent on unequal
abilities to provide human services
51Human capital and investment
- Capital suggests produced resources
- Can be misleading
- But points to important fact...
52Human capital and investment
- ...that is,
- people can and do invest in themselves
- inherent skill and investment enter in