A Case Study in Army-Air Force Co-Operation - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 13
About This Presentation
Title:

A Case Study in Army-Air Force Co-Operation

Description:

The Western Desert Air Force and the Battle for the Mareth Line, 19th 29th March 1943 ... Air superiority maintained by a roving patrol of one Spitfire squadron ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:51
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 14
Provided by: network9
Category:
Tags: air | army | case | force | one | operation | study

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: A Case Study in Army-Air Force Co-Operation


1
A Case Study in Army-Air Force Co-Operation
  • The Western Desert Air Force and the Battle for
    the Mareth Line, 19th 29th March 1943

2
Introduction
  • Perception of tactical air power
  • Flexible and adaptable
  • 1940 1942 a period of difficult gestation
  • Often derided as the Royal Absent Force
  • Hard fought lessons
  • Coninghams principles
  • Air superiority
  • Concentration of force
  • Effective planning
  • Centralised control
  • Flexibility
  • Command relationships

3
A Hawker Hurricane Mark IID of No 6 Squadron,
Royal Air Force, demonstrates the effect of its
firepower on an abandoned enemy tank in Tunisia
4
Strategic Situation
  • By January 1943 2 key problems were identified
  • The speed with which the OKW and Commando Supremo
    could reinforce their positions in Tunisia
  • The speed with which 8th Army and WDAF forces
    could be reinforced
  • Affect of the Kasserine Pass battles Operation
    Sturmflut
  • Reorganisation of air power assets in North
    Africa
  • Formation of NATAF under Coningham
  • Logistical issues for the 8th Army and WDAF
  • Operation Capri
  • Strength of the Mareth Line position

5
Initial Planning
  • Basic plan laid out by Montgomery
  • Flanking operation by the NZ Corps under Freyberg
  • To be supported by X Corps
  • Frontal attack on the Mareth Line by XXX Corps
  • Role of the air forces
  • Broad strategic outline for future operation
    dictated by Coningham at Canrobert, 12 March
  • No. 242 Group and US XII ASC to attack airfields
    maintain theatre wide air superiority
  • WDAF to operate in support of 8th Army operations
  • In support of the 8th Army attack against the
    Mareth Line operations would consist of
  • Light bombers to conduct attacks on landing
    grounds Starting 15 March
  • Fighters to maintain command of the air in the
    battlespace
  • Fighters to operate in support of the ground
    forces
  • Medium bombers to wear out German positions
  • 5 fighter wings, 3 light bomber wings, 1
    reconnaissance wing and 2 medium bomber wings in
    support

6
Operation PUGILIST
  • Initial attack went in by 50th Infantry Division,
    20th/21st March
  • BAI and air superiority mission took priority
  • Limited reaction by Axis forces
  • During 21st March BAI missions continued
  • Failure of frontal attacks on the Mareth Line
  • NZ Corps halted by 21st Panzer Division
  • Successful use of CAS in support in NZ Corps on
    22nd March
  • No. 6 Squadron in Hurricane IID tank-busters
  • Claimed 36 tanks hit
  • Prevention of further operations by bad weather
  • German counter-attacks on 23 March against XXX
    Corps
  • Forced to shift the weight of the attack

7
(No Transcript)
8
Shifting Priorities
  • Failure of XXX Corps frontal assault
  • Decision to concentrate on NZ Corps left hook
  • Intention to thrust towards the Gabes Gap via El
    Hamma
  • Air effort was to support this new thrust
  • 24th/25th March No. 6 Squadron was again in
    action around El Hamma
  • Continuing attacks on airfields
  • 20 tanks hit by Hurricane IIDs
  • Maintenance of air superiority by actions of No.
    242 Group and XII ASC
  • Army held up at El Hamma

9
Operation SUPERCHARGE II
  • Problem of geography
  • A frontal assault would be costly
  • Broadhurst suggested a possible solution
  • An air blitz
  • Use of air power of roving artillery on a fixed
    pattern
  • This would allow movement by 1st Armoured
    Division
  • Situation on other fronts
  • Broadhursts appreciation
  • NZ Corps Operation Orders driven by the air plan

10
Air Support The Breakthrough at El Hamma
  • Exploitation of allied air superiority
  • BAI operation to proceed the air blitz
  • Outline of the air blitz
  • 1530 26th March 3 waves of light and medium
    bombers launched pattern bombing
  • On lines laid by a pre-planned artillery
    programme
  • Relay attacks launched immediately after its
    completion by fighter-bombers
  • A strength of 2.5 squadrons was maintained over
    the battlespace
  • Relays arrived at quarter hour intervals
  • No. 6 Squadron Hurricane tank-busters attacked
    concentrations of tanks
  • Air superiority maintained by a roving patrol of
    one Spitfire squadron
  • Infantry advanced at 1600 at a rate of 100 feet
    a minute
  • Positions marked by flares
  • By 29th March 1st Armoured Division had breached
    the Gabes Gap

11
Command, Control, Intelligence and Reconnaissance
  • Role of 285 Wing
  • Reconnaissance in support of army preparations
  • Based on the Woodall system
  • Lessons of No. 2 AASC in the Western Desert
  • Final perfected use of the Woodall system
  • FACs deployed with 8th Armoured Brigade
  • Use of Flying FACs
  • Intelligence driven interdiction campaign

12
Comments on the Battle at El Hamma
  • An interesting feature of the El Hamma battle
    was the readiness of the Eighth Army to modify
    their plans at short notice in order to fit in
    with what was considered to be the most effective
    method of employing the air forces. The air
    operations themselves had no specifically novel
    features. The conventional rules of war were
    applied, special attention being paid to
    surprise, concentrating the maximum force at the
    right place, and carefully co-ordinating the air
    plans with those of the land forces.
  • AIR 23/6764 Operations of the Western Desert Air
    Force from the capture of Tripoli, 23rd Jan 1943,
    until the final surrender of Axis forces in North
    Africa, 13th May 1943 p. 21

13
Conclusion A Blueprint for Success?
  • A fusion of lessons
  • The RAF was proactive rather than reactive to
    army needs
  • Readiness of army commanders to listen to their
    air force counterparts
  • Growth in inter-dependence between the army and
    air force
  • Development of command relationships
  • Notably Montgomery and Broadhurst
  • Culmination of 3 years of hard fought lessons
  • A notable feature of combined arms operations in
    Italy and North-West Europe
  • Introduction of WINKLE and TIMOTHY operations
  • Links to CABRANK
  • Flexible and adaptable
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com