Title: Microgrids and the Macrogrid
1Microgrids and the Macrogrid
- Presentation to the
- California Public Utilities Commission
- 20 February 2001
- by
- Abbas Akhil, Chris Marnay, Bob Lasseter
- Sandia National Laboratory, Berkeley Lab, and
University of Wisconsin, Madison - Consortium for Electric Reliability Technology
Solutions - Other Members of CERTS Distributed Energy
Resources Group - Bob Yinger - SCE, Jeff Dagle - PNNL, John Kueck -
ORNL
2Outline
- INTRODUCTION TO CERTS - Abbas
- THE EMERGING MICROGRID PARADIGM - Chris
- DER TECHNOLOGY AND THE MICROGRID - Bob
- CONCLUSION - Bob
- QUESTIONS - all
3CERTS Mission Statement
CERTS Formation
Formed in 1998 as an Industry, DOE Labs and
Universities consortium
- To research, develop, and disseminate new
methods, tools, and technologies to protect and
enhance the reliability of the U.S. electric
power system under the emerging competitive
electricity market structure
4Research Performers
5Core Research Areas
Real-Time Grid Reliability Management
Reliability Technology Issues and Needs
Assessment
Distributed Energy Resources Integration
Addresses recommendations made by Secretary of
Energy Advisory Board (SEAB) Task Force on
Electric System Reliability
6CERTS Road Map
7CERTS Industry Advisory Board
- VIKRAM S. BUDHRAJA - Chair
- President
- Electric Power Group
- MICHEHL R. GENT
- President
- North American Electric Reliability Council
- TERRY M. WINTER
- Chief Executive Officer
- California Independent System Operator
- PHILLIP G. HARRIS
- President and CEO
- PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
- BRUCE A. RENZ
- former VP Energy Delivery Support
- American Electric Power
- Chair, AEIC Electric Reliability Committee
- EPRI Research Advisory Council
- CHARLES B. CURTIS
- Executive Vice President
- United Nations Foundation
- RICK A. BOWEN
- Executive Vice President
- Dynegy
- PAUL BARBER
- Sr. Vice President, Transmission Engrg.
- Citizens Power
- DALE T. BRADSHAW
- Senior Mgr., Power Delivery Technology
- Tennessee Valley Authority
- JOHN D. WILEY
- Provost Vice Chancellor, Academic
- University of Wisconsin
8Funding
9DOE CERTS Relationship
10The DOE DER Program Goals
- Near Term (Year 2005)
- Develop the next generation distributed energy
technologies and address institutional/regulatory
barriers - Mid Term (Year 2010)
- Reduce the costs and emissions and increase
efficiency and reliability of distributed
technologies to achieve 20 of new capacity
additions - Long Term (Year 2020)
- Make the nations electric system the cleanest,
most efficient, reliable and affordable in the
world by maximizing the use of distributed energy
resources
11Program Differences
- DOE DER Program sets national policy, goals
- Technology improvements Advanced microturbines,
gas-fired engines - Strong emphasis on combined heat and power
- Focus on reducing institutional and regulatory
barriers - CERTS DER activity focuses on DG systems issues
- Examines DG from transmission reliability
perspective - Effects of large penetration of DG into the grid
- Control, protection, role in the grid and
competitive market
12Framing the Issues
- DOE DER Program goal
- 20 of new generation capacity additions through
distributed generation by year 2010 - 26.5 GW of DG
- If small DG ( lt100 kW) captures 25 of the 26.5
GW goal, then - - 100,000 small DG sources could populate
the grid
13Meeting Future Electricity Demand
- according to the Annual Energy Outlook 2001
- to 2020 U.S. electricity demand
- will grow at only 1.8/a (GDP at 3.0)
- but with retirements, thats almost 400 GW new
capacity - thats 92 natural gas fired, tripling NG use for
power - roughly equivalent to 1000 new generating
stations plus associated transmission and
distribution
(an investment of 400 billion) - NG prices increase at only 2/a real
- electricity prices fall at 0.5/a real
- share of electricity passing through high voltage
grid unchanged
14Limits of Current Power System
- other restrictions on power system expansion
- siting, environmental, right-of-way, etc.
- efficiency limits (carbon, CHP/cogeneration,
losses) - centralized power system planning
- heterogeneous power quality requirements
- extreme customer requirements
- high cost of reliability?
- volatile bulk power markets
- economic drive to operate power system closer to
limits - can the traditional power system deliver digital
power?
15Customer Driven Development
- apply emerging technologies to self generate
- meet heterogeneous customer requirements locally
- control reliability and quality close to end-use
- optimize meshed grid reliability for bulk
transactions - operate connected or disconnected to the grid
- make decisions about power system expansion
operation - group sources and loads
- optimize over compatible electrical and heat
requirements - power system of relatively weakly interconnected
microgrids?
16A microgrid is ...
- designed, built, and controlled by customers
based on internal requirements subject to the
technical, economic, and regulatory opportunities
and constraints faced. - a cluster of small (e.g. lt 500 kW) sources,
storage systems, and loads which presents itself
to the grid as a legitimate entity, i.e. as a
good citizen - interconnected with the familiar wider power
system, or macrogrid, but can island from it
17Customer DER Adoption
- goal is to anticipate the microgrid technical
problems that must be solved - forecast the attractive technologies and
configurations - customer decision is akin to utility planning
- local constraints on development critical - GIS
- microgrids unlikely to disconnect entirely
- DER adoption can/will be shaped by tariff policy
18DER Adoption by a Typical Office Building
on-site installed capacity
economic environment scenarios
19Key DG Technology
- Appliance like DG
- 100 kW 120 - 480 V
- Microturbine
- Photovoltaic
- Automotive Fuel Cell
- Substation DG
- 1-10 MW 2.2 kV up
- Combustion Turbines
- Reciprocating Engines
- Fuel Cells
- Hybrids
20Generation Efficiencies
1 MW
70
CHP
Hybrid Fuel cell
With CHP
60
CCTG
50
Fuel Cell
Micro Turbine
40
GasTurbine
Reciprocating Engines
30
Old steam
20
10kW 100kW 1 MW
10MW 100MW 1000MW
21Reciprocating Gen Sets
- Diesel gen sets generally will be your best
choice when - Low installed cost (/kW)..
- Gas fuel is unavailable or expensive.
- Gas gen sets generally will be your best choice
when - Air emissions regulations are a concern.
- A reliable gas supply is available and
affordable.
22Caterpillars Gen Sets
- In the last 60 days, Caterpillar installed 200MW
of rental power throughout the West Coast U.S. - During 2000, they sold nearly 20 gigawatts --
23Hybrid Fuel Cells/Microturbine
- Commercial Scale Plan
- Demonstration
- DOE
- Technology Program
- 250kW
- 1.3MW
- 2.5MW
- Electricity Efficient ( gt70)
24The New Paradigm
- Distributed generation. Small-scale power
systems, installed on multiple commercial and
industrial customers' sites, can function as a
"virtual power plant" under utility control. - Utilities can dispatch these distributed systems
to enhance local grid stability, meet peak
demands, capitalize on favorable market prices,
and more.
25Application of Distributed Generation New
Paradigm
- KEY ISSUES
- Ratings gt 1MW
- Utility Voltages 2.2 - 66 kV
- Dispatchable
- Can Participate in Markets
- GENERATOR TYPE
- Combustion Turbines
- Fuel Cells
- Reciprocating Engines
- Hybrids
26Key DG Technology
- Appliance like DG
- 100 kW 120 - 480 V
- Microturbine
- Photovoltaic
- Automotive Fuel Cell
- Substation DG
- 1-10 MW 2.2 kV up
- Combustion Turbines
- Reciprocating Engines
- Fuel Cells
- Hybrids
2730-75 kW Micro turbine
- Installed at 700/kW (target is 350/kW)
- Efficiency 30
- Air foil bearings
- Operation speed 60,000-100,000 RPMs
28Microturbine Basics
29200kW Phosphoric Acid Fuel Cell
- The power plant in Santa Clara is rated at 1.8 MW
AC net - It contains more than 4,000 cells
2000-3000/kW
30Fuel Cell System
CO2
31On Site Generation
- NOx
- .00115
- .00124
- .000015
- .0005
- .00
- .010
- lb/kWh
- Microturbine
- C Turbine
- PEM Fuel Cells
- Hybrid FC/MT
- Roof top PV
- DualFuel Engine
- CO2
- 1.188
- 1.145
- 0.95
- 0.5
- .00
- 1.20
Air Pollution Emission Impacts Associated with
Economic Market Potential of DG in California,
June 2000
32Key Factors Impacting Application of Small
Distributed Generation
- KEY ISSUES
- Uses Power Electronics
- Ratings small 100kW
- Customer Voltages 120 - 480 V
- Dispatchable Very Complex
- Difficult to Participate in Markets due to small
size - Connection Cost High
- GENERATOR TYPE
- (appliance like)
- Microturbine
- Automotive Fuel Cell
- Photovoltaic
33Achieving the 100,000 units
- Rethink the paradigm
- System approach to DER
- Enable small-size DER to be a citizen of the grid
- Promote multiple unit installations
- Enable appliance type plug-and-play functionality
- Enable market participation
34MicroGrid Paradigm
- MicroGrid concept assumes a cluster of loads,
micro-sources and storage operating as a single
system to - Presented to the grid as a single controllable
unit (impacts system reliability fits new
paradigm) - Meets customers needs (such as local reliability
or power quality)
35 MicroGrid Paradigm
- Dispatchable load
- Responds to real-time pricing
- Simple protection
Utility
- Local voltage control
- UPS functions
- Local redundancy
- Digital power
- Loss reduction
- Use of waste heat
Customer
Loads, micro-sources storage
36Islanded Factory Micro Grid
Non-critical Loads
13.8 kV
480V
8
480V
22
16
11
Critical Loads
37Frequency Droop
w
P
38Island Operation
39Conclusion 100,000 units
- Key The MicroGrid (An aggregation of
micro-sources, loads and storage) - Presents itself as a single operating entity to
the grid - Customer centered Key value added point
- Can participate in markets (load management)
- Recognizes combined heat and power applications
- No centralized fast control
- Visualizes an appliance model Plug Play
model