Title: Medical Ethics for PA Students
1Medical Ethics for PA Students
- Charles Walker, PA-C, PhD
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery
- LSU Health Sciences Center
- Shreveport, LA.
- July 2005
2Medical Ethics Issues A Quick Look
3Medical Ethics Issues A Quick Look
- Allocation of Scare Resources
4Medical Ethics Issues A Quick Look
5Medical Ethics Issues A Quick Look
6Medical Ethics Issues A Quick Look
7Medical Ethics Issues A Quick Look
8Medical Ethics Issues A Quick Look
9Medical Ethics Issues A Quick Look
10Medical Ethics Issues A Quick Look
- Stem Cell / Cloning/ Genetics
11Medical Ethics Issues A Quick Look
- Ownership of Private Property / Patents
12Medical Ethics Issues A Quick Look
- What Does It Mean To Be Human?
13Systematic Ways to Think About Medical Ethics
Issues
- Ethical Theories of Medical Ethics
- Deontological Ethics
- Teleological Ethics
14Deontological Ethics
- Immanuel Kant described Deontological Ethics in
18th Century
15Deontological Ethics
- Deontological Ethics
- Deon Gr. for duty
- Duty Oriented
- certain acts can be judged to be right or wrong
in themselves
16Deontological Ethics
- Kants Categorical Imperative
- Always act in such a way that you can also will
that the maxim of your action should become a
universal law. - Act so that you treat humanity, both in your own
person and in that of another, always as an end
and never merely as a means.
17Deontological Ethics
- In an ethics of duty, the ends can never justify
the means. - Individual human rights are acknowledged and
inviolable.
18Deontological Ethics
- Kant's ethics poses two great problems that lead
many to reject it - 1. Unlike the proportionality that comes out of
the utility principle, the categorical imperative
yields only absolutes . Actions either pass or
fail with no allowance for a "gray area."
Moreover, the rigid lines are often drawn in
unlikely places. For example, lying is always
wrong--even the "polite lie." - 2. Moral dilemmas are created when duties come in
conflict, and there is no mechanism for solving
them. Utilitarianism permits a ready comparison
of all actions, and if a set of alternatives have
the same expected utility, they are equally good.
Conflicting duties, however, may require that I
perform logically or physically incompatible
actions, and my failure to do any one is itself a
moral wrong.
19Teleological Ethics
- Jeremy Bentham and J S Mill described
Teleological or Consequentialist Ethics
20Teleological Ethics
- Teleological or Consequentialist Ethics
- Teleos Gr. for goal or end
- Goal Oriented
- rightness or wrongness of an act is to be judged
in terms of the consequences it produces
21Teleological Ethics
- Actions are right to the degree that they tend to
promote the greatest good for the greatest number
- Utilitarianism is a simple theory and its results
are easy to apply
22Teleological Ethics
- The good" is defined in terms of well-being
(Aristotle's eudaimonia), and distinguished not
just quantitatively but also qualitatively
between various forms of pleasure. - The principle defines the moral right in terms of
an objective, material good. - Bridge gap between empirical facts and a
normative conclusion--cost/benefit analysis
23Teleological Ethics
- It is not always clear what the outcome of an
action will be, nor is it always possible to
determine who will be affected by it. Judging an
action by the outcome is therefore hard to do
beforehand. - It is very difficult to quantify pleasures for
cost/benefit analysis (but since this only has to
be done on a comparative scale, this may not be
as serious an objection as it at first seems). - The calculation required to determine the right
is both complicated and time consuming. Many
occasions will not permit the time and many
individuals may not even be capable of the
calculations. - Since the greatest good for the greatest number
is described in aggregate terms, that good may be
achieved under conditions that are harmful to
some, so long as that harm is balanced by a
greater good. - The theory fails to acknowledge any individual
rights that could not be violated for the sake of
the greatest good. Indeed, even the murder of an
innocent person would seem to be condoned if it
served the greater number
24Case Studies
- Mr Wilkinson is a 77-year-old who lives with
his wife and son. He is terminally ill with
cancer of the lung with liver secondaries. Over
the last few months he has deteriorated, he has
also lost a lot of weight. It has now been
decided that Mr Wilkinson should be admitted for
assessment and pain control. - He is currently taking co-codamol for pain
relief but it is felt by the nursing staff that
his pain relief would be better met through use
of morphine. However, Mr Wilkinson has stressed
that he does not want to start taking morphine
having heard terrible stories about people who
have taken it. - The ward staff express their concerns to you
that they feel Mr Wilkinson is in pain and that
he looks uncomfortable. The staff have asked him
on several occasions but he always says he's ok.
During previous respite admissions, Mr Wilkinson
has told nursing staff that he does not want to
be drugged to death, He feels the Lord will
receive him when he is ready. - One week after his admission, he
deteriorates. He becomes semi-conscious - he is
dying. During periods of consciousness he becomes
very agitated, screaming at times - especially
when moved. - The nursing staff on the ward are very
distressed by this. The wife and son are asked if
they would agree to morphine or sedation being
given to the patient. They refuse. - The next day the son appears ambivalent
about the decision to withhold morphine. - Both the Consultant and nursing staff feel
that morphine should be given. The junior doctors
and staff feel that the wishes of the family
should be observed as they are worried about a
complaint.