Medical Ethics for PA Students - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 24
About This Presentation
Title:

Medical Ethics for PA Students

Description:

Medical Ethics for PA Students. Charles Walker, PA-C, PhD. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery ... of well-being (Aristotle's eudaimonia), and distinguished not just ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:58
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 25
Provided by: cwa3
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Medical Ethics for PA Students


1
Medical Ethics for PA Students
  • Charles Walker, PA-C, PhD
  • Department of Orthopaedic Surgery
  • LSU Health Sciences Center
  • Shreveport, LA.
  • July 2005

2
Medical Ethics Issues A Quick Look
  • Human Studies

3
Medical Ethics Issues A Quick Look
  • Allocation of Scare Resources

4
Medical Ethics Issues A Quick Look
  • Karen Ann Quinlen

5
Medical Ethics Issues A Quick Look
  • Abortion

6
Medical Ethics Issues A Quick Look
  • Euthanasia

7
Medical Ethics Issues A Quick Look
  • Cost Benefit Analysis

8
Medical Ethics Issues A Quick Look
  • Transplant Issues

9
Medical Ethics Issues A Quick Look
  • Fertility Issues

10
Medical Ethics Issues A Quick Look
  • Stem Cell / Cloning/ Genetics

11
Medical Ethics Issues A Quick Look
  • Ownership of Private Property / Patents

12
Medical Ethics Issues A Quick Look
  • What Does It Mean To Be Human?

13
Systematic Ways to Think About Medical Ethics
Issues
  • Ethical Theories of Medical Ethics
  • Deontological Ethics
  • Teleological Ethics

14
Deontological Ethics
  • Immanuel Kant described Deontological Ethics in
    18th Century

15
Deontological Ethics
  • Deontological Ethics
  • Deon Gr. for duty
  • Duty Oriented
  • certain acts can be judged to be right or wrong
    in themselves

16
Deontological Ethics
  • Kants Categorical Imperative
  • Always act in such a way that you can also will
    that the maxim of your action should become a
    universal law.
  • Act so that you treat humanity, both in your own
    person and in that of another, always as an end
    and never merely as a means.

17
Deontological Ethics
  • In an ethics of duty, the ends can never justify
    the means. 
  • Individual human rights are acknowledged and
    inviolable.

18
Deontological Ethics
  • Kant's ethics poses two great problems that lead
    many to reject it
  • 1. Unlike the proportionality that comes out of
    the utility principle, the categorical imperative
    yields only absolutes . Actions either pass or
    fail with no allowance for a "gray area."
    Moreover, the rigid lines are often drawn in
    unlikely places. For example, lying is always
    wrong--even the "polite lie."
  • 2. Moral dilemmas are created when duties come in
    conflict, and there is no mechanism for solving
    them. Utilitarianism permits a ready comparison
    of all actions, and if a set of alternatives have
    the same expected utility, they are equally good.
    Conflicting duties, however, may require that I
    perform logically or physically incompatible
    actions, and my failure to do any one is itself a
    moral wrong.

19
Teleological Ethics
  • Jeremy Bentham and J S Mill described
    Teleological or Consequentialist Ethics

20
Teleological Ethics
  • Teleological or Consequentialist Ethics
  • Teleos Gr. for goal or end
  • Goal Oriented
  • rightness or wrongness of an act is to be judged
    in terms of the consequences it produces

21
Teleological Ethics
  • Actions are right to the degree that they tend to
    promote the greatest good for the greatest number
  • Utilitarianism is a simple theory and its results
    are easy to apply

22
Teleological Ethics
  • The good" is defined in terms of well-being
    (Aristotle's eudaimonia), and distinguished not
    just quantitatively but also qualitatively
    between various forms of pleasure.
  • The principle defines the moral right in terms of
    an objective, material good.
  • Bridge gap between empirical facts and a
    normative conclusion--cost/benefit analysis

23
Teleological Ethics
  • It is not always clear what the outcome of an
    action will be, nor is it always possible to
    determine who will be affected by it. Judging an
    action by the outcome is therefore hard to do
    beforehand.
  • It is very difficult to quantify pleasures for
    cost/benefit analysis (but since this only has to
    be done on a comparative scale, this may not be
    as serious an objection as it at first seems).
  • The calculation required to determine the right
    is both complicated and time consuming. Many
    occasions will not permit the time and many
    individuals may not even be capable of the
    calculations.
  • Since the greatest good for the greatest number
    is described in aggregate terms, that good may be
    achieved under conditions that are harmful to
    some, so long as that harm is balanced by a
    greater good.
  • The theory fails to acknowledge any individual
    rights that could not be violated for the sake of
    the greatest good. Indeed, even the murder of an
    innocent person would seem to be condoned if it
    served the greater number

24
Case Studies
  • Mr Wilkinson is a 77-year-old who lives with
    his wife and son. He is terminally ill with
    cancer of the lung with liver secondaries. Over
    the last few months he has deteriorated, he has
    also lost a lot of weight. It has now been
    decided that Mr Wilkinson should be admitted for
    assessment and pain control.
  • He is currently taking co-codamol for pain
    relief but it is felt by the nursing staff that
    his pain relief would be better met through use
    of morphine. However, Mr Wilkinson has stressed
    that he does not want to start taking morphine
    having heard terrible stories about people who
    have taken it.
  • The ward staff express their concerns to you
    that they feel Mr Wilkinson is in pain and that
    he looks uncomfortable. The staff have asked him
    on several occasions but he always says he's ok.
    During previous respite admissions, Mr Wilkinson
    has told nursing staff that he does not want to
    be drugged to death, He feels the Lord will
    receive him when he is ready.
  • One week after his admission, he
    deteriorates. He becomes semi-conscious - he is
    dying. During periods of consciousness he becomes
    very agitated, screaming at times - especially
    when moved.
  • The nursing staff on the ward are very
    distressed by this. The wife and son are asked if
    they would agree to morphine or sedation being
    given to the patient. They refuse.
  • The next day the son appears ambivalent
    about the decision to withhold morphine.
  • Both the Consultant and nursing staff feel
    that morphine should be given. The junior doctors
    and staff feel that the wishes of the family
    should be observed as they are worried about a
    complaint.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com