Title: Biodemography%20of%20Human%20Longevity:%20New%20Findings%20and%20Ideas
1Biodemography of Human Longevity New Findings
and Ideas
- Dr. Leonid A. Gavrilov, Ph.D.
- Dr. Natalia S. Gavrilova, Ph.D.
-
- Center on Aging
- NORC and The University of Chicago
- Chicago, Illinois, USA
2Approach
- To study success stories in long-term avoidance
of fatal diseases (survival to 100 years) and
factors correlated with this remarkable survival
success
3Centenarians represent the fastest growing age
group in the industrialized countries
- Yet, factors predicting exceptional longevity and
its time trends remain to be fully understood - In this study we explored the new opportunities
provided by the ongoing revolution in information
technology, computer science and Internet
expansion to explore early-childhood predictors
of exceptional longevity
Jeanne Calment (1875-1997)
4Revolution in Information TechnologyWhat does
it mean for longevity studies?
- Over 75 millions of computerized genealogical
records are available online now!
5Computerized genealogies is a promising source of
information about potential predictors of
exceptional longevity life-course events,
early-life conditions and family history of
longevity
6Computerized Genealogies as a Resource for
Longevity Studies
- Pros provide important information about family
and life-course events, which otherwise is
difficult to collect (including information about
lifespan of parents and other relatives) - Cons Uncertain data quality
Uncertain validity and generalizability
7For longevity studies the genealogies with
detailed birth dates and death dates for
long-lived individuals (centenarians) and their
relatives are of particular interest
- In this study 1,001 genealogy records for
centenarians born in 1875-1899 were collected and
used for further age validation
8(No Transcript)
9Steps of Centenarian Age Verification
- Internal consistency checks of dates
- Verification of death dates linkage to the
Social Security Administration Death Master File
(DMF) - Verification of birth dates linkage to early
Federal censuses (1900, 1910, 1920, 1930)
10Results of Centenarian Age Verification
1001 records consistency checks 990 records used for further verification
990 records were linked to the SSA Death Master File Linkage success rate 77 (80 for centenarians born after 1890) In 3 of cases centenarian status was not confirmed
548 records found in DMF for persons born in 1890-1899 were then linked to early US censuses Linkage success rate 80 when using Genealogy.com and 91 after supplementation with Ancestry.com. In 8 of cases a 1-year disagreement between genealogy and census record was observed
11Conclusions of the Age Verification Study
- Death dates of centenarians recorded in
genealogies always require verification because
of strong outliers (1.3, misprints) - Birth dates of centenarians recorded in
genealogies are sufficiently accurate - 92 are
correct for the remaining 8 only one-year
disagreements - Quality of genealogical data is good enough if
these data are pre-selected for high data quality
12Predictors of Exceptional Longevity
13Within-Family Study of Exceptional Longevity
Cases - 198 Centenarians born in U.S. in
1890-1893 Controls Their own siblings Method
Conditional logistic regression Advantage
Allows researchers to eliminate confounding
effects of between-family variation
14Design of the Study
15A typical image of centenarian family in 1900
census
16First-born siblings are more likely to become
centenarians (odds 1.8)
Conditional (fixed-effects) logistic regression N950, Prob gt chi20.0000 Conditional (fixed-effects) logistic regression N950, Prob gt chi20.0000 Conditional (fixed-effects) logistic regression N950, Prob gt chi20.0000 Conditional (fixed-effects) logistic regression N950, Prob gt chi20.0000
Variable Odds ratio 95 CI P-value
First-born status 1.77 1.18-2.66 0.006
Male sex 0.40 0.28-0.58 lt0.001
17Birth Order and Odds to Become a Centenarian
18Can the birth-order effect be a result of
selective child mortality, thus not applicable to
adults?
- Approach
- To compare centenarians with those siblings only
who survived to adulthood (age 20)
19First-born adult siblings (20years) are more
likely to become centenarians (odds
1.95)
Conditional (fixed-effects) logistic regression N797, Prob gt chi20.0000 Conditional (fixed-effects) logistic regression N797, Prob gt chi20.0000 Conditional (fixed-effects) logistic regression N797, Prob gt chi20.0000 Conditional (fixed-effects) logistic regression N797, Prob gt chi20.0000
Variable Odds ratio 95 CI P-value
First-born status 1.95 1.26-3.01 0.003
Male sex 0.46 0.32-0.66 lt0.001
20Are young fathers responsible for birth order
effect?
Conditional (fixed-effects) logistic regression N950, Prob gt chi20.0000 Conditional (fixed-effects) logistic regression N950, Prob gt chi20.0000 Conditional (fixed-effects) logistic regression N950, Prob gt chi20.0000 Conditional (fixed-effects) logistic regression N950, Prob gt chi20.0000
Variable Odds ratio 95 CI P-value
Born to young father 1.86 0.99-3.50 0.056
Male sex 0.42 0.29-0.59 lt0.001
21Birth order is more important than paternal age
for chances to become a centenarian
Conditional (fixed-effects) logistic regression N950, Prob gt chi20.0000 Conditional (fixed-effects) logistic regression N950, Prob gt chi20.0000 Conditional (fixed-effects) logistic regression N950, Prob gt chi20.0000 Conditional (fixed-effects) logistic regression N950, Prob gt chi20.0000
Variable Odds ratio 95 CI P-value
First-born status 1.64 1.03-2.61 0.039
Born to young father 1.29 0.63-2.67 0.484
Male sex 0.41 0.29-0.58 lt0.001
22Are young mothers responsible for the birth order
effect?
Conditional (fixed-effects) logistic regression N950, Prob gt chi20.0000 Conditional (fixed-effects) logistic regression N950, Prob gt chi20.0000 Conditional (fixed-effects) logistic regression N950, Prob gt chi20.0000 Conditional (fixed-effects) logistic regression N950, Prob gt chi20.0000
Variable Odds ratio 95 CI P-value
Born to young mother 2.03 1.33-3.11 0.001
Male sex 0.41 0.29-0.59 lt0.001
23Maternal Age at Persons Birth and Odds to Become
a Centenarian
24Birth order effect explainedBeing born to young
mother!
Conditional (fixed-effects) logistic regression N950, Prob gt chi20.0000 Conditional (fixed-effects) logistic regression N950, Prob gt chi20.0000 Conditional (fixed-effects) logistic regression N950, Prob gt chi20.0000 Conditional (fixed-effects) logistic regression N950, Prob gt chi20.0000
Variable Odds ratio 95 CI P-value
First-born status 1.36 0.86-2.15 0.189
Born to young mother 1.76 1.09-2.85 0.021
Male sex 0.41 0.29-0.58 lt0.001
25Even at age 75 it still helps to be born to young
mother (age lt25)(odds 1.9)
Conditional (fixed-effects) logistic regression N557, Prob gt chi20.0000 Conditional (fixed-effects) logistic regression N557, Prob gt chi20.0000 Conditional (fixed-effects) logistic regression N557, Prob gt chi20.0000 Conditional (fixed-effects) logistic regression N557, Prob gt chi20.0000
Variable Odds ratio 95 CI P-value
Born to young mother 1.86 1.15-3.05 0.012
Male sex 0.46 0.31-0.69 lt0.001
26Question
- Families were quite large in the past,
particularly those covered by genealogical
records (large family size bias). - Is the "young mother effect" robust to the family
size, and is it observed in smaller families too? - Or is it confined to extremely large families
only? - Approach
- To split data in two equal parts by median family
size (9 children) and re-analyze the data in each
group separately.
27Results
- In smaller families (less than 9 children) the
effect of young mother is even larger - Odds ratio 2.23, P0.004 95CI 1.30 - 3.98
- Compare to larger families (more than 9
children) - Odds ratio 1.72, P0.11 95CI 0.88 - 3.34
- Conclusion
- "Young mother effect" is not confined to
extremely large family size
28New Striking Findings Invitation for discussion
and brain-storming!
- The favorable "Young Mother Effect" is
particularly strong when parents have
particularly large differences in their lifespan
29Odds Ratio to live to 100 years if born to young
motheras a function of maternal and paternal
lifespans (tertiles)
MOTHER FATHER FATHER FATHER
MOTHER Shorter-lived Medium-lived Longer-lived
Shorter-lived 0.93 1.29 4.04
Medium-lived 3.49 3.01 1.50
Longer-lived 11.62 1.21 0.36
plt0.05
30Being born to Young Mother Helps Laboratory Mice
to Live Longer
- Source
- Tarin et al., Delayed Motherhood
Decreases Life Expectancy of Mouse Offspring. - Biology of Reproduction 2005 72 1336-1343.
31Physical Characteristics at Young Age and
Survival to 100
A study of height and build of centenarians when
they were young using WWI civil draft
registration cards
32Height What to Expect
- Height seems to be a good indicator of
nutritional status and infectious disease history
in the past. - Historical studies showed a negative correlation
between height and mortality. - Hence we may expect that centenarians were taller
than average
33Build What to Expect
- Slender build may suggest a poor nutrition during
childhood. We may expect that centenarians were
less likely to be slender when young. - On the other hand, biological studies suggest
that rapid growth may be harmful and somewhat
delayed maturation may be beneficial for
longevity.
34Data Sources
- Social Security Administration Death Master File
- WWI civil draft registration cards (completed for
almost 100 percent men born between 1873 and
1900)
35Study Design
- Cases men centenarians born in 1887 (randomly
selected from the SSA Death Master File) and
linked to the WWI civil draft records. Out of
120 selected men, 19 were not eligible for draft.
The linkage success for remaining 101 records was
75 (76 records) - Controls men matched on birth year, race and
county of WWI civil draft registration
36Height and Survival to 100
37Body Build and Survival to 100
38Results of multivariate study
Variable OR P-value
Tall and medium height vs short height 1.98 0.308
Slender and medium build vs stout build 9.96 0.032
Qualified jobs vs unqualified 1.57 0.300
Married vs unmarried 1.02 0.958
Natural born vs immigr. 1.12 0.782
39Conclusion
- The study of height and build among men born in
1887 suggests that rapid growth and overweight at
young adult age (30 years) might be harmful for
attaining longevity
40What are the Links Between Human Longevity and
Fertility?
Testing the evolutionary theory of aging
41Founding Fathers
- Beeton, M., Yule, G.U., Pearson, K. 1900. Data
for the problem of evolution in man. V. On the
correlation between duration of life and the
number of offspring. Proc. R. Soc. London, 67
159-179. - Data used English Quaker records and Whitney
Family of Connectucut records for females and
American Whitney family and Burkes Landed
Gentry for males.
42Findings and Conclusions by Beeton et al., 1900
- They tested predictions of the Darwinian
evolutionary theory that the fittest individuals
should leave more offspring. - Findings Slightly positive relationship between
postreproductive lifespan (50) of both mothers
and fathers and the number of offspring. - Conclusion fertility is correlated with
longevity even after the fecund period is passed
and selective mortality reduces the numbers of
the offspring of the less fit relatively to the
fitter.
43Other Studies, Which Found Positive Correlation
Between Reproduction and Postreproductive
Longevity
Telephone inventor Alexander Graham Bell (1918)
The longer lived parents were the most
fertile.
- Bettie Freeman (1935) Weak positive correlations
between the duration of postreproductive life in
women and the number of offspring borne. Human
Biology, 7 392-418. - Bideau A. (1986) Duration of life in women after
age 45 was longer for those women who borne 12 or
more children. Population 41 59-72.
44Studies that Found no Relationship Between
Postreproductive Longevity and Reproduction
- Henry L. 1956. Travaux et Documents.
- Gauter, E. and Henry L. 1958. Travaux et
Documents, 26. - Knodel, J. 1988. Demographic Behavior in the
Past. - Le Bourg et al., 1993. Experimental Gerontology,
28 217-232.
45Study that Found a Trade-Off Between
Reproductive Success and Postreproductive
Longevity
- Westendorp RGJ, Kirkwood TBL. 1998. Human
longevity at the cost of reproductive success.
Nature 396 743-746. - Extensive media coverage including BBC and over
100 citations in scientific literature as an
established scientific fact. Previous studies
were not quoted and discussed in this article.
46Point estimates of progeny number for married
aristocratic women from different birth cohorts
as a function of age at death. The estimates of
progeny number are adjusted for trends over
calendar time using multiple regression.
- Source Westendorp, Kirkwood, Human longevity at
the cost of reproductive success. Nature, 1998,
396, pp 743-746
47 it is not a matter of reduced fertility, but a
case of 'to have or have not'.
Source Toon Ligtenberg Henk Brand. Longevity
does family size matter? Nature, 1998, 396, pp
743-746
48Number of progeny and age at first childbirth
dependent on the age at death of married
aristocratic women
- Source Westendorp, R. G. J., Kirkwood, T. B. L.
Human longevity at the cost of reproductive
success. Nature, 1998, 396, pp 743-746
49- Source Westendorp, R. G. J., Kirkwood, T. B. L.
Human longevity at the cost of reproductive
success. Nature, 1998, 396, pp 743-746
50Do longevous women have impaired fertility ?Why
is this question so important and interesting?
Scientific Significance
- This is a testable prediction of some
evolutionary theories of aging - disposable soma
theory of aging (Kirkwood)
"The disposable soma theory on the evolution of
ageing states that longevity requires investments
in somatic maintenance that reduce the resources
available for reproduction (Westendorp,
Kirkwood, Nature, 1998).
51Do longevous women have impaired fertility ?
- Practical Importance.
- Do we really wish to live a long life at the
cost of infertility? -
- the next generations of Homo sapiens will
have even longer life spans but at the cost of
impaired fertility - Rudi Westendorp Are we becoming less
disposable? EMBO Reports, 2004, 5 2-6.
"... increasing longevity through genetic
manipulation of the mechanisms of aging raises
deep biological and moral questions. These
questions should give us pause before we embark
on the enterprise of extending our lives
Walter Glennon "Extending the Human Life Span",
Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 2002, Vol.
27, No. 3, pp. 339-354.
52- Educational Significance
- Do we teach our students right?
- Impaired fertility of longevous women is
often presented in scientific literature and mass
media as already established fact (Brandt et al.,
2005 Fessler et al., 2005 Schrempf et al.,
2005 Tavecchia et al., 2005 Kirkwood, 2002
Westendorp, 2002, 2004 Glennon, 2002 Perls et
al., 2002, etc.). - This "fact" is now included in teaching
curriculums in biology, ecology and anthropology
world-wide (USA, UK, Denmark). -
- Is it a fact or artifact ?
53General Methodological Principle
- Before making strong conclusions, consider all
other possible explanations, including potential
flaws in data quality and analysis - Previous analysis by Westendorp and Kirkwood was
made on the assumption of data completenessNumbe
r of children born Number of children
recorded - Potential concerns data incompleteness,
under-reporting of short-lived children, women
(because of patrilineal structure of genealogical
records), persons who did not marry or did not
have children.Number of children born  gtgt
Number of children recorded
54Test for Data Completeness
- Direct Test Cross-checking of the initial
dataset with other data sources - We examined 335 claims of childlessness in
the dataset used by Westendorp and Kirkwood.
When we cross-checked these claims with other
professional sources of data, we found that at
least 107 allegedly childless women (32) did
have children! - At least 32 of childlessness claims proved to
be wrong ("false negative claims") ! - Some illustrative examplesHenrietta Kerr
(16531741) was apparently childless in the
dataset used by Westendorp and Kirkwood and lived
88 years. Our cross-checking revealed that she
did have at least one child, Sir William Scott
(2nd Baronet of Thirlstane, died on October 8,
1725). - Â Charlotte Primrose (17761864) was also
considered childless in the initial dataset and
lived 88 years. Our cross-checking of the data
revealed that in fact she had as many as five
children Charlotte (18031886), Henry
(18061889), Charles (18071882), Arabella
(1809-1884), and William (18151881). - Wilhelmina Louise von Anhalt-Bernburg
(17991882), apparently childless, lived 83
years. In reality, however, she had at least
two children, Alexander (18201896) and Georg
(18261902).
55Point estimates of progeny number for married
aristocratic women from different birth cohorts
as a function of age at death. The estimates of
progeny number are adjusted for trends over
calendar time using multiple regression.
- Source Westendorp, R. G. J., Kirkwood, T. B. L.
Human longevity at the cost of reproductive
success. Nature, 1998, 396, pp 743-746
56Antoinette de Bourbon(1493-1583)
- Lived almost 90 years
- She was claimed to have only one child in the
dataset used by Westendorp and Kirkwood Marie
(1515-1560), who became a mother of famous Queen
of Scotland, Mary Stuart. - Our data cross-checking revealed that in fact
Antoinette had 12 children! - Marie 1515-1560
- Francois Ier 1519-1563
- Louise 1521-1542
- Renee 1522-1602
- Charles 1524-1574
- Claude 1526-1573
- Louis 1527-1579
- Philippe 1529-1529
- Pierre 1529
- Antoinette 1531-1561
- Francois 1534-1563
- Rene 1536-1566
57Characteristics of Our Data Sample for
Reproduction-Longevity Studies
- 3,723 married women born in 1500-1875 and
belonging to the upper European nobility. - Women with two or more marriages (5) were
excluded from the analysis in order to facilitate
the interpretation of results (continuity of
exposure to childbearing).
- Every case of childlessness has been checked
using at least two different genealogical
sources.
58Childlessness is better outcome than number of
children for testing evolutionary theories of
aging on human data
- Applicable even for population practicing birth
control (few couple are voluntarily childless) - Lifespan is not affected by physiological load of
multiple pregnancies - Lifespan is not affected by economic hardship
experienced by large families
59(No Transcript)
60Source Gavrilova et al. Does exceptional human
longevity come with high cost of infertility?
Testing the evolutionary theories of aging.
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 2004,
1019 513-517.
61Source Gavrilova, Gavrilov. Human longevity and
reproduction An evolutionary perspective. In
Grandmotherhood - The Evolutionary Significance
of the Second Half of Female Life. Rutgers
University Press, 2005, 59-80.
62Short Conclusion
- Exceptional human longevity is NOT associated
with infertility or childlessness
63More Detailed Conclusions
- We have found that previously reported high rate
of childlessness among long-lived women is an
artifact of data incompleteness, caused by
under-reporting of children. After data cleaning,
cross-checking and supplementation the
association between exceptional longevity and
childlessness has disappeared. - Thus, it is important now to revise a highly
publicized scientific concept of heavy
reproductive costs for human longevity. and to
make corrections in related teaching curriculums
for students.
64More Detailed Conclusions (2)
- It is also important to disavow the doubts and
concerns over further extension of human
lifespan, that were recently cast in biomedical
ethics because of gullible acceptance of the idea
of harmful side effects of lifespan extension,
including infertility (Glannon, 2002). - There is little doubt that the number of children
can affect human longevity through complications
of pregnancies and childbearing, as well as
through changes in socioeconomic status, etc.Â
However, the concept of heavy infertility cost
of human longevity is not supported by data, when
these data are carefully reanalyzed.
65Parental-Age Effects in Humans (accumulation of
mutation load in parental germ cells)
- What are the Data and the Predictions of
Evolutionary Theory on the Quality of Offspring
Conceived to Older Parents? - Does progeny conceived to older parents live
shorter lives?
66Evolutionary Justification for Parental-Age
Effects
- "The evolutionary explanation of senescence
proposes that selection against alleles with
deleterious effects manifested only late in life
is weak because most individuals die earlier for
extrinsic reasons. - This argument also applies to alleles whose
deleterious effects are nongenetically
transmitted from mother to progeny, that is, that
affect the performance of progeny produced at
late ages rather than of the aging individuals
themselves. - a decline of offspring quality with parental
age should receive more attention in the context
of the evolution of aging. - Stearns et al. "Decline in offspring
viability as a manifestation of aging in
Drosophila melianogaster." Evolution, 2001, Vol.
55, No. 9, pp. 18221831.
67Genetic Justification for Paternal Age Effects
- Advanced paternal age at child conception is the
main source of new mutations in human
populations. - James F. Crow, geneticist
Professor Crow (University of Wisconsin-Madison)
is recognized as a leader and statesman of
science. He is a member of the National Academy
of Sciences, the National Academy of Medicine,
The American Philosophical Society, the American
Academy of Arts and Sciences, the World Academy
of Art and Science.
68Paternal Age and Risk of Schizophrenia
- Estimated cumulative incidence and percentage of
offspring estimated to have an onset of
schizophrenia by age 34 years, for categories of
paternal age. The numbers above the bars show the
proportion of offspring who were estimated to
have an onset of schizophrenia by 34 years of
age. - Source Malaspina et al., Arch Gen
Psychiatry.2001.
69Paternal Age as a Risk Factor for Alzheimer
Disease
- MGAD - major gene for Alzheimer Disease
- Source L. Bertram et al. Neurogenetics, 1998, 1
277-280.
70Daughters' Lifespan (30) as a Functionof
Paternal Age at Daughter's Birth6,032 daughters
from European aristocratic families born in
1800-1880
- Life expectancy of adult women
(30) as a function of father's age when these
women were born (expressed as a difference from
the reference level for those born to fathers of
40-44 years). - The data are point estimates (with standard
errors) of the differential intercept
coefficients adjusted for other explanatory
variables using multiple regression with nominal
variables. - Daughters of parents who survived to 50
years.
71Contour plot for daughters lifespan (deviation
from cohort mean) as a function of paternal
lifespan (X axis) and paternal age at daughters
birth (Y axis)
7984 cases 1800-1880 birth cohorts European
aristocratic families Distance weighted least
squares smooth
72Daughters Lifespan as a Function of
Paternal Age at Daughters Birth Data are
adjusted for other predictor variables
Daughters of shorter-lived fathers (lt80), 6727
cases
Daughters of longer-lived fathers (80), 1349
cases
73Conclusions
- Being conceived to old fathers is a risk factor,
but it is moderated by paternal longevity - It is OK to be conceived to old father if he
lives more than 80 years - Methodological implications Paternal lifespan
should be taken into account in the studies of
paternal-age effects
74Heritability of Longevity
75Mutation Accumulation Theory of Aging (Medawar,
1946)
- From the evolutionary perspective, aging is an
inevitable result of the declining force of
natural selection with age. - So, over successive generations, late-acting
deleterious mutations will accumulate, leading to
an increase in mortality rates late in life.
76Predictions of the Mutation Accumulation Theory
of Aging
- Mutation accumulation theory predicts that those
deleterious mutations that are expressed in later
life should have higher frequencies (because
mutation-selection balance is shifted to higher
equilibrium frequencies due to smaller selection
pressure). - Therefore, expressed genetic variability should
increase with age (Charlesworth, 1994. Evolution
in Age-structured Populations). - This should result in higher heritability
estimates for lifespan of offspring born to
longer-lived parents.
77Linearity Principle of Inheritance in
Quantitative Genetics
- Dependence between parental traits and offspring
traits is linear
78The Best Possible Source on Familial Longevity
Genealogies of European Royal and Noble Families
Charles IX dAnguleme (1550-1574)
Marie-Antoinette von Habsburg-Lothringen
(1765-1793)
Henry VIII Tudor (1491-1547)
79Characteristic of our Dataset
- Over 16,000 persons belonging to the European
aristocracy - 1800-1880 extinct birth cohorts
- Adult persons aged 30
- Data extracted from the professional genealogical
data sources including Genealogisches Handbook
des Adels, Almanac de Gotha, Burke Peerage and
Baronetage.
80Daughter's Lifespan(Mean Deviation from Cohort
Life Expectancy)as a Function of Paternal
Lifespan
- Offspring data for adult lifespan (30 years) are
smoothed by 5-year running average. - Extinct birth cohorts (born in 1800-1880)
- European aristocratic families. 6,443
cases
81The Heritability of Life-Spans Is SmallC.E.
Finch, R.E. Tanzi, Science, 1997, p.407
Paradox of low heritability of lifespan vs high
familial clustering of longevity
long life runs in families A. Cournil, T.B.L.
Kirkwood, Trends in Genetics, 2001, p.233
82Heritability Estimates of Human Lifespan
Author(s) Heritability estimate Population
McGue et al., 1993 0.22 Danish twins
Ljungquist et al., 1998 lt0.33 Swedish twins
Bocquet-Appel, Jacobi, 1990 0.10-0.30 French village
Mayer, 1991 0.10-0.33 New England families
Cournil et al., 2000 0.27 French village
Mitchell et al., 2001 0.25 Old Order Amish
83Is the effect of non-linear inheritance remain
valid after controlling for other explanatory
variables?
- Lifespan of other parent
- Parental ages at childs conception
- Ethnicity
- Month of birth
84Offspring Lifespan at Age 30 as a Function
of Paternal LifespanData are adjusted for
other predictor variables
Daughters, 8,284 cases
Sons, 8,322 cases
85Offspring Lifespan at Age 30 as a Function
of Maternal LifespanData are adjusted for
other predictor variables
Daughters, 8,284 cases
Sons, 8,322 cases
86Is the effect of non-linear inheritance observed
for non-biological relatives?
- We need to test an alternative hypothesis that
positive effects of long-lived parents on the
offspring survival may be non-biological and
caused by common environment and life style - What about lifespan of spouses?
87Persons Lifespan as a Function of Spouse
LifespanData are adjusted for other predictor
variables
Married Women, 4,530 cases
Married Men, 5,102 cases
88Acknowledgments
- This study was made possible thanks to
- generous support from the National Institute on
Aging and the Society of Actuaries -
89For More Information and Updates Please Visit Our
Scientific and Educational Website on Human
Longevity
- http//longevity-science.org
And Please Post Your Comments at our Scientific
Discussion Blog
- http//longevity-science.blogspot.com/