Title: Air Quality Modeling
1Air Quality Modeling
- Rosa Sohn and Sun-Kyoung Park
21. Introduction
Atmospheric Chemistry
Emissions Inputs
Pollutant Distributions
Numerical Routines
Meteorological Fields
Effects
Emissions Modeling
Visualization
Meteorological Modeling
InputsPopulation Roads Land Use Industry
Meteorology
Economics
InputsTopography Observed Meteorology Solar
insolation
Controls
32. Eulerian and Lagrangian models
- 2.1. Eulerian Model
- The behavior of species is described relative to
a fixed coordinate system - (1) Single box model
- Focus atmospheric chemistry
- Lack physical realism - horizontal and vertical
transport, etc. - (2) Multi-dimensional grid-based air quality
model - Potentially the most powerful
- Involving the least-restrictive assumption
- 2.2. Lagrangian Model
- The concentration changes are described relative
to the moving fluid
43. Air Quality Model Formulation(1)
i1,2,3, . . . , n
ci concentration of species i.
wind velocity vector
Di molecular diffusivity of species i
Ri rate of concentration change of species i by
chemical reaction
Si source/sink of i
r air densityn number of predicted species
53. Air Quality Model Formulation(2)
Reynolds decomposition K theory
Assumption
Atmospheric Diffusion Equation (ADE)
64. Model components and process descriptions(1)
- Turbulent transport and diffusion
- K-theory
- K Function of the atmospheric stability class
and the mixing height - Deposition
- Dry deposition vd(ra rb rc ) 1
ra aerodynamic resistance, controlled by the
atmospheric turbulence rb resistance in
the fluid sublayer very near the plant surface
rc surface(or canopy) resistance, the
function of pollutant, land-use,
surface condition(dew, rain or dry..) and season - Wet deposition
- Because of the meteorological models uncertainty
in the formation of the clouds and the
precipitation, wet deposition has still much
uncertainty.
74. Model components and process descriptions(2)
- Chemical kinetics
- Homogeneous gas-phase chemistry
- Heterogeneous chemistry
- Acid deposition, aerosol formation
- Radiative transfer (Approach)
- To adjust the sea-level photolysis rates for
solar zenith angle, wavelength, changes in
altitude, haze and clouds, preferably using
measurements. - To use a look-up table derived from a detailed
radiative transfer model and then modify the
results for clouds (e.g., CMAQ) - To use radiative fluxes calculated by
meteorological model being used to provide other
field
84. Model components and process descriptions(3)
- Particulate matter
- Impact health, visibility and gas phase species
levels - (e.g., In the presence of aerosol, scattering
increase - ? Increase in ozone formation)
- Particulate matter modeling
- Formation and growth Sectioning size
distribution - Size and chemical compositionCondensation,
Coagulation, Sedimentation and Nucleation - Individual sources are simulated to emit a set of
aerosol packets with specific sizes and
compositions (Cass, et al).
95. Mathematical and computational
implementation(1)
- Horizontal transport algorithms
- Based on Finite Difference, Finite Element and
Finite Volume - Spectral Method, Lagrangian approach
- Problem with solving the set of equations
- Spatial discretization artificial numerical
dispersion, which is manifested by the formation
of spurious waves and by pollutant peaks being
spread out - Currently small error/uncertainty in application
- Chemical dynamics 80 of the computer time
- QSSA(quasi-steady-state approximation)
- Hybrid method
- Gear-type method
- Good for the large integration time step (e.g.,
1hr)
105. Mathematical and computational
implementation(2)
- Monoscale, nested multiscale and adaptive grids
- Large grid size is inappropriate for the
non-linear reactions (e.g., ozone) with
significant chemical gradient in cities - Considering computational resources, using finer
grids in urban area and coarser grids over rural
area - Plume modeling
- Concentrated sources of some pollutants in coarse
resolution(e.g., power plant) - Mixing is at a finite rate ? local ? volume
average concentration. - Assumption of immediate mixing often leads to
overestimating the oxidation rate of NO (e.g., in
VOC rich environment). - Adaptive mesh technique
- Mesh is generated automatically to capture the
fine scale features
115. Mathematical and computational
implementation(3)
- Mass conservation in air quality models
- Without using the continuity equation explicitly,
models diagnose air density from pressure and
temperature (e.g., MM5) - Even the continuity equation is satisfied,
- Meteorological model output is stored at a
certain interval (e.g., 1hr) - Air Quality Models time step (e.g., 10 min) ?
Interpolation - The interpolation of density and momentum does
not guarantee the mass conservation - ?Vertical or horizontal velocity is
recomputed.
125. Mathematical and computational
implementation(4)
- Advanced Analysis routines
- Integration of specific physical and chemical
processes terms - Applied to Lagrangian Box Modeling studies
- Direct sensitivity analysis
- Brute Force
- Decoupled Direct Method(DDM)
- Adjoint Approach
- Limitation cannot capture nonlinear response
136. Model Input (1) - Meteorology
- Meteorological Input
- Horizontal and Vertical Wind fields, Temperature,
Humidity, Mixing depth, Solar insolation fields,
Vertical diffusivities, cloud characteristics(liqu
id water content, droplet size, cloud size,
etc.), rain fall - How to prepare input fields?
- Interpolating relatively sparse observations over
the modeling domain using the objective analysis - Meteorological Model (e.g., MM5) output because
of the sparseness of data
146. Model Input (2) Emission
- Emission
- CO, NO, NO2, SO2, VOCs, SO3, NH3, PM2.5 and PM10
- Emissions are one of the most uncertain, but the
most important inputs into air quality models - Temporal Processing
- The inventory is the yearly averaged data, but
the AQM needs short interval emission input(e.g.,
hourly). - Spatial Processing
- The inventory is county based data, but the AQM
needs gridded emission inventory if you are doing
the multi-dimensional grid-based air quality model
15UNPROJECTED LATITUDE-LONGITUDE
16Map Projection
- Grid defined in the AQM depends on the map
projection. - Map Projection
- Attempt to portray the surface of the earth or a
portion of the earth on a flat surface - Cylindrical
- Psuedo-cylindrical
- Conical
- Azimuthal
- Other
17(1) Cylindrical Projection
Mercator Lamberts Cylindrical Equal-area
Galls Sterographic Cylindrical Miller
Cylindrical Behrmann Cylindrical Equal-area
Peters Transverse Mercator
18(2) Psuedo-Cylindrical Projections
- Mollweide Equal-area
- Eckert IV Equal-area
- Eckert VI Equal-area
- Sinusoidal Equal-area
- Robinson
19(3) Conical Projections
- Albers Equal Area Conical Projection
- Lambert Conformal Conical Projection
- Equidistant Conical Projection
CONICAL TANGENT
20(4) Azimuthal Projections
Equidistant Azimuthal Projection Lambert
Equal Area Azimuthal Projection
217. Air Quality Model Evaluation (1)
- Assessment of the adequacy and correctness of the
science represented in the model through
comparison against empirical data - Normalized Bias, D
- Normalized Gross Error, Ed
- Unpaired Peak Prediction Accuracy
227. Air Quality Model Evaluation (2)
- Statistical Benchmark for the model performance
(US EPA, 1991 Tesche et al.) - Normalized Bias ?
5 ? 15 - Normalized Gross Error ? 30
? 35 - Unpaired peak prediction accuracy ? 15 ? 20
237. Model Evaluation (3) Input Meteorology
- Mean Bias Error (MBE)
- Mean Normalized Bias (MNB)
- Root Mean Square Error (RMSE)
- Mean Absolute Gross Error (MAGE)
- Mean Normalized Gross Error (MNGE)
24Statistical Benchmarks
7. Model Evaluation (4) Input Meteorology
Wind Speed RMSE ? 2 m/s Bias ? ?0.5 m/s
Wind Direction Gross Error ? 30 deg Bias ? ?10 deg
Temperature Gross Error ? 2 K Bias ? ?0.5 K
Specific Humidity Gross Error ? 2g/kg Bias ? ?1g/kg
Source Environmental Report MM5 Performance
Evaluation Project
Matthew T. Johnson, Kirk Baker (2001)
258. Application (1)
- Sensitivity to Process Parameterizations
- Sensitivity to Model Numerics/Structure
- Small uncertainty in numerical technique
- Grid size, number of the vertical layers.
- (e.g., Difference in ozone prediction
Horizontal grid size 5 km, 10 km and 20km
Number of the vertical layers 6 15
layers)
268. Application (2)
- Sensitivity to Model Input
- Emissions, meteorological conditions, boundary
conditions, initial conditions, HONO formation
rate and deposition - Emission control ? Ozone and PM control (e.g.,
SO2 control ? sulfate decrease, but nitrate
increases) - VOCs with different reactivity ? Ozone, PM,
(e.g., Methanol based fuels would be beneficial
for ozone control because of its atmospheric low
reactivity)
279. Current Status of AQM
- 1st generation simple chemistry at local scales
- 2nd generation local, urban, regional addressing
each scale with a separate model and often
focusing on a single pollutant. - 3rd generation multiple pollutants
simultaneously up to continental scales and
incorporate feedbacks between chemical and
meteorological components. - Models3 (SMOKE, MM5 and CMAQ(Community Multiscale
Air Quality) Modeling system urban to regional
scale air quality simulation of tropospheric
ozone, acid deposition, visibility and fine
particulate). - 4th generation (Future) extend linkages and
process feedback to include air, water, land, and
biota to simulate the transport and fate of
chemical and nutrients throughout an ecosystem.
28Step 1. Getting Started with AQM
- Download the existing model with free of charge
- Models3
- MM5 (http//www.mmm.ucar.edu/mm5/mm5-home.html)
- PSU/NCAR mesoscale model version 5
- Meteorological Field
- SMOKE (http//edge.emc.mcnc.org/uihelp/docs/smoke.
html) - Sparse Matrix Operator Kernel Emissions modeling
system - Converting emissions inventory data into the
formatted emission files required by an AQM - CMAQ (http//www.epa.gov/asmdnerl/models3/)
- Community Multiscale Air Quality Modeling System
- Atmospheric chemistry combined with the numerical
routine
29Step 2. Meteorological Input MM5 (1)
- MM5 (PSU/NCAR mesoscale model version 5) download
- http//www.mmm.ucar.edu/mm5/mm5-home.html
- MM5 Input Data http//dss.ucar.edu/catalogs/
- Topography and Landuse data
- Gridded atmospheric data with sea-level pressure,
wind, temperature, relative humidity and
geopotential height - Observation data that contains soundings and
surface reports
30Step 2. Meteorological Input MM5 (2)
- MM5 Output Manipulation for the evaluation, etc.
- MM5toGrADS http//www.mmm.ucar.edu/mm5/mm5v3/tutor
ial/mm5tograds/mm5tograds.html - GrADS(Grid Analysis and DisplaySystem)
http//grads.iges.org/grads/ - Converting the MM5 output to the format required
in SMOKE and CMAQ (NetCDF format) - MCIP2(Meteorology-Chemistry Interface Processor
Version 2) Inside of the CMAQ model system
31Step 3. Emission Input SMOKE
- National Emission Inventory (1996 yr, 1999 yr)
(http//www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/net/index.html) - Projection to the model year
- EGAS 4.0 (http//www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/emch/projec
tion/egas40/) - Spatial Processing
- Converting the county based inventory data to the
gridded emission inventory which fits to the
multi-dimensional grid-based air quality model - ESRI ArcGIS ArcView, ArcInfo, ArcMap,
ArcToolbox and ArcCatalog - (Architecture Computer Lab (Rm 359))
- SMOKE (http//edge.emc.mcnc.org/uihelp/docs/smoke.
html) - Converting emissions inventory into the formatted
emission files required by an AQM (NetCDF format)
32Step 4. Air Quality Modeling - CMAQ
- CMAQ Modeling system
- (Community Multiscale Air Quality)
- http//www.epa.gov/asmdnerl/models3/
- CMAQ Document
- http//www.epa.gov/asmdnerl/models3/doc/science/sc
ience.html - CMAQ Tutorial
- http//www.epa.gov/scram001/cmaq.htm
33Step 5. Tools
- PAVE
- The Package for Analysis and Visualization of
Environmental Data - Visualization and the analysis of NetCDF data
- http//www.epa.gov/asmdnerl/models3/vistutor/pave.
html - NetCDF IO/API
- The Models-3 Input/Output Applications
Programming Interface - The standard data access library for EPA's
Models-3 available from both C and Fortran.
(ASCII or Binary ?? NetCDF) - http//www.emc.mcnc.org/products/ioapi/AA.html
- AQM testing with arbitrary input (e.g., zero
emission) - Evaluation
34Questions Comments Reference NARSTO
critical review of photochemical models and
modeling, Armistead Russell and Robin Dennis,
2000 Atmospheric Environment 34. 2283 - 2324