Deterministic Network Coding by Matrix Completion - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 35
About This Presentation
Title:

Deterministic Network Coding by Matrix Completion

Description:

Let XM X be variables used by JB. BetterCompletion. Given A, compute LM-matrix ... Handling XM. Thm: The value v can be found in O(n2) time ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:94
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 36
Provided by: nickh8
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Deterministic Network Coding by Matrix Completion


1
DeterministicNetwork Codingby Matrix Completion
  • Nick HarveyDavid KargerKazuo Murota

2
Network Coding Example
s
t
b1
b2
  • Nodes s and t want to swap bits b1 and b2
  • No disjoint paths from s?t and t?s

3
Network Coding Example
b1
b2
s
t
  • Key idea allow nodes to encode data
  • Send xor b1?b2 on bottleneck edge
  • Nodes s and t can decode desired bit

4
Multicast in DAGs
  • 1 source, k sinks
  • Source has r messages in alphabet ?
  • Each sink wants all msgs
  • Network code function node inputs ? outputs
  • Thm ACLY00 Network coding solution exists iff
    connectivity r to each sink

m1
m2
mr

Source
Sinks
5
Linear Network Codes
  • Treat alphabet ? as finite field
  • Node outputs linearcombinations of inputs
  • Thm LYC03 Linear codes sufficient for
    multicast in DAGs
  • Thm HKMK03 Random linear codes work

A
B
?A?B
?A?B
6
Our Contribution (Network Coding)
  • Deterministic algorithm for multicast problems
  • Derandomization of HKMK algorithm
  • Runtime Õ( sinks edges3 )
  • Related Work
  • Jaggi et al deterministic alg
  • Our algebraic technique more general

7
Characterizing Multicast Solutions
  • Sink receives linear comb of source msgs
  • Linear combs have full rank ? can decode!
  • Def KM Transfer matrix Mt for sink t
  • Thm KM Network coding solution exists iffdet
    Mt ? 0, for all sinks t.

8
Expanded Transfer Matrices
  • Def Expanded transfer matrix (for sink t)

A 0
Nt
I-F Bt
  • Each entry is a number or a variable.
  • Lemma det Mt ? det Nt
  • Goal substitute values into expanded transfer
    matrices s.t. they have full rank

A matrix completion problem
9
Matrix Completion
  • Def A completion is an assignment of values to
    the variables that maximizes the rank.
  • Thm L79 Choosing random values in Fn gives a
    completion with prob gt 1/2.
  • Used in RNC bipartite matching
  • Thm G99 Completion in Fn can be
    founddeterministically in O(n9) time.

10
Simultaneous Completion
  • Does Geelen solve our problem? No.
  • We have set of mixed matrices N N1, , Nk
  • Each variable appears at most once per matrix
  • A variable can appear in several matrices
  • Def A simultaneous completion for N is an
    assignment of values to the variables that
    preserves the rank of all matrices
  • Hard part matrices overlap, not identical
  • Randomized algorithm still works

11
Our Contribution (Matrix Completion)
  • Let N N1, , Nk be a set of mixed matrices
    of size n x n
  • Let X be the variables in N
  • Thm A simultaneous completion for N can be found
    deterministically over Fk1 in time
    O( N (n3 log n X n2) )For a single matrix,
    the time is O( n3 log n )

12
Mixed Matrices
  • Let A Q T be a mixed matrix where
  • Q contains only numbers
  • T contains only variables (or zeros)
  • A is equivalent to
  • Numbers and variables in disjoint rows? a
    layered mixed matrix (LM-matrix)

(i.e. rank A rank à - n)
I Q
Ã
diag(z1,,zn)
I T
13
Computing rank of LM-matrices
  • Thm M93 rank Ã
  • maxcols JT,JB JT ? JB
  • s.t. in top rows, columns JT are indep
  • in bottom rows, columns JB are indep
  • Find JT and JB by matroid union algorithm?
    efficient alg to compute rank Ã

14
Matrix Completion
  • Use black-box rank alg to find completion
  • Lemma Let P(x1,,xt) be a multivariatepolynomial
    with all exponents ? d.If q?d then P(x1,,xt) ?
    0 has a solution in Fq.
  • Proof Similar to Schwartz-Zippel.

15
Simple Completion Algorithm
  • Let A be a mixed matrix
  • Let X be the variables in A
  • det(A) linear in each variable? non-root exists
    over F2
  • SimpleCompletion foreach x ? X
  • set x 0
  • compute rank of A
  • if rank has decreased, set x 1

16
Sharing work in computing rank
  • When fill in one value, matrix doesnt change
    much
  • So, reuse info from previous round to quickly
    update rank computation for next matrix entry

17
Computing rank by matroid union
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Ã
z1
z2
x1
x2
z3
x3
18
Computing rank by matroid union
1
1
1
MT
1
1
1
1
z1
MB
z2
x1
x2
z3
x3
19
Computing rank by matroid union
JT
1
1
1
MT
1
1
1
1
z1
MB
z2
x1
x2
z3
x3
JB
20
Independent Matching Approach
CT
1
1
1
MT
1
1
1
1
RT
CB
z1
MB
z2
x1
x2
z3
x3
21
Independent Matching Approach
CT
1
1
1
MT
1
1
1
1
RT
CB
z1
MB
z2
x1
x2
z3
x3
22
Independent Matching Approach
CT
Cols must be indep.
JT
1
1
1
MT
1
1
1
1
RT
CB
Non-zeroswhere edgesbend
JB
z1
MB
z2
x1
x2
z3
x3
23
Computing Rank of Ã
  • Compute max indep matching, JT and JB
  • rank à JT JB
  • Time to find max indep matching
  • O(n3 log n) Cunningham 1986
  • O(n2.62) Gabow-Xu 1996

24
Better Completion Algorithm
  • BetterCompletion
  • Given A, compute LM-matrix Ã
  • Compute max indep matching M for Ã
  • Idea Use structure of matching to helpfind
    completion
  • Let XM ? X be variables used by JB

25
Better Completion Algorithm
z1
z2
x2
x1
z3
x3
  • Idea Use structure of matching to helpfind
    completion
  • Let XM ? X be variables used by JB
  • Lemma Setting x ? X \ XM to 0does not affect
    rank

26
Better Completion Algorithm
  • BetterCompletion
  • Given A, compute LM-matrix Ã
  • Compute max indep matching M for Ã
  • Foreach x ? X \ XM, set x 0
  • Variables in XM are more tricky

27
Handling XM
  • Example
  • Assign x1 the value v

1
1
1
1
1
1
1
CB
z1
x1
z2
x1
x1
x3
z3
x3
x3
28
Handling XM
  • Example
  • Assign x1 the value v
  • x1 and its edge disappear
  • v appears in top matrix Because A Q T and

1
1
1
v
1
1
1
1
CB
I Q
z1
Ã
diag(z1,,zn) T
z2
x3
z3
x3
x3
29
Handling XM
  • Example
  • Must update M
  • All vertices in CB must have a matching edge
  • Must add this col to JT
  • Must swap a col from JT and add it to JB

1
1
1
v
1
1
1
1
CB
z1
z2
x3
z3
x3
x3
30
Handling XM
c2
c4
Swapping Lemma ?v s.t.JT c2 c4 andJB c1
c3 are indep
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
z2
c1
c3
31
Handling XM
c2
c4
Swapping Lemma ?v s.t.JT c2 c4 andJB c1
c3 are indep
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
z2
c1
c3
32
Handling XM
c2
c4
Thm The value v can be found in O(n2)
time Proof Maintain Gauss-Jordan pivoted copies
of Q. Finding v now trivial.
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
z2
c1
c3
33
Better Completion Algorithm
  • BetterCompletion
  • Given A, compute LM-matrix Ã
  • Compute max indep matching M for Ã
  • Foreach x ? X \ XM, set x 0
  • Foreach x ? XM,
  • Use swapping lemma and pivoted forms to
    find a good value v
  • Set x v

Time required O(n3 log n)
34
Simultaneous Matrix Completion
  • Let N N1, , Nk be a set of mixed matrices
  • A simultaneous completion for N is an assignment
    of values to the variables that preserves the
    rank of all matrices
  • Thm BetterCompletion alg can be extended to find
    simultaneous completion for N over Fk1
  • Pf Sketch Run simultaneously on all Ni. Choose
    values v that are good for all Ni.

35
Summary
  • Network coding model for sending data
  • Deterministic alg for multicast
  • New deterministic alg for matrix completion
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com