Southeastern Pharmacy Officers Conference - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 26
About This Presentation
Title:

Southeastern Pharmacy Officers Conference

Description:

Identification, validation, authentication, and tracking and tracing of prescription drugs ... TRACKING AND TRACING Requirements for prescription drugs ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:84
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 27
Provided by: IS188
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Southeastern Pharmacy Officers Conference


1
Southeastern Pharmacy Officers Conference
  • Dale D. Masten
  • August 2, 2008
  • Director, State Government Affairs
  • National Association of Chain Drug Stores

2
What Am I Talking About?
  • Pedigree, Track and Trace
  • Health Information Technology and Privacy
  • Federal Internet Legislative Activity

3
Pedigree
  • Food and Drug Administration Amendments Act of
    2007 added 21 USC 355e Pharmaceutical Security
    to the Food Drug and Cosmetic Act
  • FDA to develop standards and identify and
    validate effective technologies for the purpose
    of securing drug supply chain against
    counterfeit, diverted, substandard, adulterated,
    misbranded or expired drugs.

4
Federal Pedigree Requirement Where are we
now?
  • 21 USC 355e
  • Standards development - Secretary
  • Consultation
  • Federal and state agencies, manufacturers,
    distributors, pharmacies and other supply chain
    stakeholders
  • Prioritize and develop standards
  • Identification, validation, authentication, and
    tracking and tracing of prescription drugs
  • Develop Standardized numerical identifier
  • By March 2010
  • Applied at point of manufacture and repackaging
    (linked to manufacturer identifier)
  • At package or pallet level

5
Federal Pedigree Requirement Where are we
now?
  • 21 USC 355e
  • Standards development continued
  • Standards developed shall address promising
    technologies which may include
  • RFID
  • Nanotechnology
  • Encryption technologies, and
  • Other trace and trace or authentication
    technologies

6
Federal Pedigree Requirement Where are we
now?
  • FDA Standards development
  • In March 2008 FDA issued requests for information
    from stakeholders on what standards are needed
    for
  • Standardized numerical identifier
  • Technologies for drug identification, validation,
    track and trace, authentication
  • NACDS was just one group that submitted comments
  • Waiting for FDA to provide further information

7
HR 5839 (Reps Buyer and Matheson) Safeguarding
Americas Pharmaceuticals Act
  • Introduced
  • No action yet by Energy and Commerce Comm.
  • Includes
  • Allows FDA to destroy counterfeit drugs
  • Interim Provisions
  • Applicable before track and trace
  • Manufacturer to provide packing list with
    information on drugs shipped
  • Pedigrees (paper or electronic)
  • Each person except mfg and wholesaler to provide
    pedigree ? 2 types of pedigrees
  • Direct purchase pedigree (ADRs)
  • Standard pedigree

8
Federal HR 5839 (Reps Buyer and Matheson)
  • Additional provisions
  • Returns
  • Must be shown on the pedigree
  • Different categories of returns
  • Saleable returns
  • Mistakes in ordering/shipment
  • Returned in 7 days with Certified Statement
  • Other returns
  • Drugs with Direct Purchase pedigree
  • Returned with Certified Statement
  • Non-saleable
  • Returned without pedigree

9
Federal HR 5839 (Reps Buyer and Matheson)
  • TRACKING AND TRACING Requirements for
    prescription drugs
  • Different requirement dates for high risk and
    generic drugs
  • Complicated Timelines
  • For when drugs must be tracked and traced i.e.
    not later than
  • For when regulations must be issued

10
Federal HR 5839 (Reps Buyer and Matheson)
  • TIMING DEPENDS ON WHEN FDA announces STANDARDS
  • POSSIBLE TIMELINE Scenario under the bill
  • March 2009 FDA announces
  • Standard identifier
  • List of high risk drugs
  • September 2010
  • Manufacturers must apply std identifier to high
    risk drugs
  • March 2012
  • Manufacturers must apply std identifier to other
    drugs
  • March 2012 to September 2012
  • Track and trace starts for high risk drugs
  • September 2012 to December 2012
  • Track and trace starts for other drugs

11
HR 5839 (Buyer and Matheson)
  • Grants to independent pharmacies
  • Not owned or operated by a publicly traded
    company
  • Grant preference to independent pharmacies with
    annual gross revenues of 6,500,000 or less
  • Purchase qualified identification and tracking
    technologies
  • 1 matching for 3 federal funds
  • Must report to Secretary within 1 year on impact
    of grant

12
HR 5839 (Buyer and Matheson)
  • Preemption of state laws for
  • Pedigrees
  • Manufacturer packing lists
  • Unique standard identifiers
  • Drug identification and tracking system

13
HR 5839 (Buyer and Matheson)
  • Other provisions
  • Wholesale distributor licensure
  • Increased requirements
  • Bonds
  • Mandatory background checks
  • Fingerprinting
  • Key personnel qualifications
  • Mandatory physical inspections prior to licensure
  • Injunctions, civil penalties
  • States may bring civil enforcement proceedings
  • Study on threats to domestic prescription drug
    supply chain

14
Senate Approach
  • In the Food Safety Bill there is a requirement
    that requires manufacturers to incorporate Track
    and Trace on raw products.

15
Health Information Technology (HIT)/Privacy
  • H.R. 6357 the Protecting Records, Optimizing
    Treatment, and Easing Communication through
    Healthcare Technology Act of 2008 or the
    PRO(TECH)T Act of 2008.
  • Sponsored by Chairman Dingell (D-MI) and
    Representative Joe Barton (R-TX).
  • Has Bi-partisan support.
  • Passage is a priority of sponsors.

16
Health Information Technology (HIT)/Privacy
  • Weighed down with onerous privacy provisions.
  • Substituted and passed by voice vote in House
    Energy and Commerce Committee.
  • Some concerns addressed, agreement to address
    others prior to full passage.

17
Health Information Technology (HIT)/Privacy Contd
  • Changes made in Committee
  • Clarifies that consent may be a one-time
    aggregated consent, revocation of consent can
    only be for data collected prospectively (not
    retrospectively), and that providers can maintain
    a patients information in an electronic medical
    record (whether or not the provider receives
    consent).
  • Requires the Secretary of HHS to promulgate
    regulations implementing the consent provisions
    in a manner that protects health information and
    is deemed reasonable and workable, including
    providing the Secretary with the authority to
    exempt certain healthcare operations from the
    consent requirement.

18
Health Information Technology (HIT)/Privacy Contd
  • Provides a safe harbor by which an individual
    would not need to be notified if the breached
    information was encrypted and clarifies that good
    faith disclosures of health information will not
    constitute a breach.
  • Allows for industry-developed technology
    standards to determine what information is
    unsecured personal health information and require
    the Secretary of HHS to develop and disseminate
    model, informed consent through notice and
    comment, respectively.

19
Health Information Technology (HIT)/Privacy Contd
  • Changes the accounting for disclosures for
    treatment, payment, and healthcare operations so
    that it goes into effect either when an entity
    acquires or upgrades its electronic medical
    record or six months after a technical standard
    is adopted by the Secretary of HHS (whichever is
    sooner). In addition, the amount of time a
    provider must retain the information was reduced
    from six years to three years.

20
Health Information Technology (HIT)/Privacy Contd
  • Concerns to be addressed prior to passage
  • Sponsored by Representative Rogers (R-MI)
  • Change the bill requirement of accounting for
    disclosures so pharmacies would have to account
    only for disclosures made for the purpose of
    healthcare operations.
  • change the bill requirement for obtaining patient
    consent by stating that the regulations to
    implement the consent requirement must ensure
    that such requirement does not impede access to
    healthcare or reduce healthcare quality or
    safety.

21
Federal Internet Legislative Activity
  • Senate passed S. 980, Feinstein
  • Referred to House, introduced their version, H.
    6353
  • Provisions
  • Restrictions on dispensing controlled substances
    over the Internet
  • Requires valid prescription
  • Legitimate medical purpose
  • At least 1 in-person medical evaluation

22
Federal Internet Legislative Activity
  • Requires online pharmacies to meet additional
    requirements
  • Supplemental DEA registration as online pharmacy
  • Website disclosure of pharmacy information name,
    address, telephone numbers, name, license and
    professional degree of PIC for each pharmacy,
    list of states where pharmacy is licensed to
    dispense controlled substances, certification
    that the pharmacy has required supplemental DEA
    registration to dispense controlled substances
    over the Internet, and name and other information
    on any practitioner who has a contractual
    relationship to provide medical evaluations or
    issues prescriptions for controlled substances

23
Federal Internet Legislative Activity
  • Reporting to the DEA - in an aggregate total
    quantity - the amount of each controlled
    substance dispensed
  • Statement on website of compliance with the law
  • Specific Statement as required in the law that
    the online pharmacy will only dispense a
    controlled substance pursuant to a valid
    prescription

24
Federal Internet Legislative Activity
  • Increases criminal penalties
  • List of offenses involving unlawful dispensing of
    controlled substances by means of the Internet
  • Rule of construction nothing in the law to be
    construed to authorize, limit, or prohibit
    electronic prescriptions for controlled
    substances

25
Federal Internet Legislative Activity
  • Exempts certain entities from being online
    pharmacies
  • DEA registered pharmacies that by means of the
    Internet refill controlled substances
    prescriptions or obtain new Rx for patient with
    existing CS Rx
  • Manufacturers, distributors, hospitals operated
    by US, Indian tribal health care facilities, mere
    advertisements on the Internet that do no attempt
    to facilitate transaction with a controlled
    substance
  • Non-US Internet sites that do not facilitate
    dispensing controlled substances by the Internet
    to persons in the US

26
THANK YOUQUESTIONS ??
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com