Title: PISA Project on Learning and Teaching Strategies in Schools
1PISAProject on Learning and Teaching Strategies
in Schools
- A Video Based Classroom Study in
- Mathematics
- Science
- Language Arts
Funded by The Norwegian Research Counsel
2Research Group
- 3-4 Senior Researchers
- Pedagogy, Science Education, Text Comprehension
(reading) - 1 Post Doc
- Science Education
- 4 PhD Students
- Text Comprehension (reading), Science Education,
Math Education, Pedagogy - 1-2 Technicians
-
3Motivation for PISA
- To pursue problematic PISA findings for
Norway - The achievement within all domains (reading,
mathematics, and science) are near the OECD
average, and has declined in 2003. - Relatively high spread in student achievement.
- Increasing gender difference in reading literacy
in favour of girls. - A particularly narrow repertoire of learning
strategies. - Low level of pressure to achieve, and high level
of noise and disorder, according to reports from
both students and principals.
4Motivation for PISA cont.
- To deepen our understanding of the findings
from the Norwegian Curriculum Evaluation (R97) - High pressure on learning activities low
pressure on learning goals. - Low and unclear standards for students
achievements and performances. - Individual seatwork is the most frequent activity
in all classrooms. - Little time is used by teachers for explaining
concepts and topics. - Big differences in time allocation and grouping
procedures between primary level and upper
secondary level. - An inclusive and informal climate between
students and teachers in all classrooms.
5Focus for PISA
- Study offered learning activities, actions, and
experienced learning activities, meaning in
mathematics, science and language arts(reading).
6Main Research Questions
- How can we understand and interpret the general
achievement level and patterns in the Norwegian
PISA results? - How can we understand the pedagogical processes
that shape this reality? - How can we transform some of the PISA findings
into concrete suggestions for improving Norwegian
education in the perspective of life-long
learning?
7Design
- PISA is inspired by the design and framework
of Learners Perspective Study. Our data are - Observations and videorecordings (teacher, class,
student) - Interviews (teacher, student)
- Copies of student work
-
8Mixed Methods Research Design
PISA
Evaluation of R97
Quantitative research
Qualitative research
PISA
Qualitative research objective
Collect qualitative data
Perform qualitative analysis
Perform quantitative analysis
9Data Collection
- Variation as sampling strategy
- 6 schools chosen on the basis of demographic
and pedagogical criteria. - 3 weeks at each school.
- Recording/observing lessons in mathematics,
science and language arts. - Interviews with selected students after each
observed lesson in mathematics and science. - 2-3 interviews with teachers in the involved
subjects during the three week period.
10Technical Expertise
- A data engineer working at the University of Oslo
has been in charge of ordering adequate technical
equipment. This has been done in close
cooperation with external expertise and us, the
users. - He has consulted both sound-experts and
video-experts. - He is still connected to the project as a
technical consultant.
11Technical Equipment
- A powerful computer workstation with specialised
software and hardware, recording in MPEG2
(videoformat). - This computer has 4 videotracks and 8
soundtracks. All used tracks are directly
synchronized with the help of the installed
software. - A mixing board to control the sound, and two
screens to monitor the videofilming. - Laptops for student interviews.
- 4-5 External harddiscs (250 GB).
12The Computer Workstation
- The technician monitors
- Video recording
- Sound recording
- Remote controlled camera
- Sound feedback
Photo Ola Sæther
13Technical Equipment cont.
- Four small video cameras one teacher camera with
remote control, one focus group camera, one
whole-class camera and one camera in reserve. - One handheld video camera.
- One whole-class microphone and bugs on both
focus students and teacher. - Audioreceivers and headphones for the observers
with the opportunity to listen to either the
teacher or the two focus students during
recording.
14Technical Equipment cont.
- Two screens for monitoring the videorecording.
- Four special cables, one for each camera, with a
socket outlet box for the video signals and the
electric current. The cables vary in length from
25 to 50 meter. - A lot of smaller accessories like stop watches,
tripods, magic arms, super clamps, sucking discs,
strips, tape, batteries etc. - One flightcase for the work station and two other
flightcases for the rest of the equipment.
15Info About Data Size
- Recording one lesson with three cameras occupies
7,5 GB diskspace. - We have recorded approximately
- -150 video filmed lessons
- - 75 student
interviews - - 25 teacher
interviews - All together 2,6 TB
16Data Storage
- We have purchased our own server (capacity 5,6
TB) which is used exclusively for storing PISA
data. - We have bought several external harddiscs (250
GB), to be used for temporary storing of
video-data. These harddiscs also makes
transportation easy. Every workday we would copy
files from the computer workstation to these
harddiscs. - Once or twice a week we would copy files from the
external harddiscs to the main server, which had
its own backup system, located at the University
of Oslo
17Data Storage cont.
- After double-checking the copying of datafiles
from the external harddiscs to the server, these
master-copy files were locked for editing and
turned into read only. - Only persons involved in PISA have access to the
data-material on this server.
18Data Storage Principles
- Our most important principle throughout the
process was - Be very particular about keeping account of
where the data is stored. - This was done by elaborating clear and unique
labels for datafiles and keeping a logbook which
was updated on a daily basis. - For safety reasons all the material would always
be stored in minimum two places, until it was
safely stored on the main server.
19Log for video-recording at fieldwork
20LOG FOR PLACEMENT OF FILE
21Student Interviews
- The videofiles were copied to an external
harddisc immediately after the end of a lesson. - This harddisc was then connected to a laptop for
the video-stimulated student interview. - We would mainly use the recordings from the
teacher camera and the focusgroup camera for this
student interview. - The interview was recorded and directly saved on
a file on the computer workstation.
22Major Advantages With Our Technical Solution
- No need for time-consuming synchronizing of the
recordings. - All the recorded data are directly digitalized.
- Small sized, invisible equipment inside the
classroom leads to minimal interference and
disturbance of the lesson. - Researchers (2) remain seated during class in
order to cause minimal disturbance. - Technical crew are situated outside the classroom
for the same reason.
23Major Advantages With Our Technical Solution cont.
- Video-stimulated student interviews can be
carried out shortly after the end of a lesson.
Recordings from all three cameras are available
for the interviews. - Our experience was that students were positively
motivated by high-tech equipment. - All datafiles can be easily retrieved by the
involved researchers.
24Some Disadvantages
- Rigorous planning of the daily recordings.
- A lot of extra work when teachers were changing
classroom. - High demand on cooperation.
- Meticulous daily logbook writing.
- A lot of technical equipment to keep track of.
- Some heavy equipment.
- A lot of cable stretching.
25A Rough Estimation of Expenses
- Approximately 100 000 Euro for all technical
equipment. - Approximately 50 of this was spent on the
server. - The other 50 was used on the computer
workstation, the cameras and the accessories.
26Remotely controlled teacher camera
27Focus group camera
28Wholeclass camera