Title: Investment Management Tutorial
1Investment Management Tutorial
- October 10, 2008
- James Kozyra
2Chapter 5 Problem 16
- You are faced with the probability distribution
on the stock market index fund given below.
Suppose the price of a put option on a share of
the index fund with an exercise price of 110 and
maturity of one year is 12. The current share
price is 100 and a cash dividend of 4 per share
is expected to be paid during the year.
3Chapter 5 Problem 16
- What is the probability distribution of the HPR
on the put option
Stock
Put Option
4Chapter 5 Problem 16
- What is the probability distribution of the HPR
on a portfolio consisting of one share of the
index fund and a put option? - The cost of one share and a put is 112 (110
12).
HPR Boom (140 - 112 4) / 112 28.6 HPR
Normal (110 - 112 4) / 112 1.8 HPR
Recession (110 - 112 4) / 112 1.8
5Chapter 5 Problem 16
C) In what sense does buying the put option
constitute a purchase of insurance in this
case? A minimum HPR of 1.8 is guaranteed
regardless of what happens to the stock price.
You are thus protected against a price decline.
6Chapter 8 Problem 14
- Two investment advisors are comparing
performance. One averaged a 19 rate of return
and the other a 16 rate of return. However, the
beta of the first investor was 1.5, whereas the
that of the second was 1. -
- a) Can you tell which investor was a better
predictor of individual stocks (aside from the
issue of general movements in the market)?
7Chapter 8 Problem 14
- a) To determine which investor was the better
predictor we look at their abnormal return, which
is the ex-post alpha. This means that the
abnormal return is the difference between the
actual return and the return predicted by the
SML. - Without the parameters of the equation
(risk-free rate and market rate of return) we
cannot determine which investor was more accurate.
8Chapter 8 Problem 14
- b) If the t-bill rate were 6 and the market
return during the period were 14, which investor
would be the superior stock selector? -
-
- Investor 1 19 6 1.5(14-6)
- 19 18 1
-
- Investor 2 16 6 1(14-6)
- 16 14 2
9Chapter 8 Problem 14
- c) What if the t-bill rate were 3 and the
market return were 15? -
-
- Investor 1 19 3 1.5(15-3)
- 19 21 -2
-
- Investor 2 16 3 1(15-3)
- 16 15 1
10Chapter 8 Problem 14
- First case the second investor has the larger
abnormal return and appears to be the superior
stock selector. He appears to have done a better
job finding underpriced stocks. - Second case the second investor again is the
superior stock selector. The first investors
predictions appear to be worthless.
11Chapter 6 Problem 21
- You manage a risky portfolio with an expected
rate of return of 18 and a standard deviation of
28. The t-bill rate is 8. A passive portfolio
has an expected rate of return of 13 and a
standard deviation of 25. - Your client ponders whether to switch the 70
that he has invested in your risky portfolio to
the passive portfolio.
12Chapter 6 Problem 21
- a) Explain to your client the disadvantages of
the shift. - Current Portfolio
- E(r) (.3 x 8) (.7 x 18) 15
- Std Dev .7 x 28 19.6
- Portfolio after the shift
- E(r) (.3 x 8) (.7 x 13) 11.5
- Std Dev .7 x 25 17.5
-
13Chapter 6 Problem 21
- a) Therefore, the shift entails a decline in the
expected return from 14 to 11.5 and a decline
in the standard deviation from 19.6 to 17.5. - The disadvantage is that the client could
achieve an 11.5 expected return in my portfolio,
with a lower standard deviation. -
14Chapter 6 Problem 21
- We first must write the mean of the complete
portfolio as a function of the proportions
invested in my portfolio, y - E(r) 8 y(18-8)
- E(r) 8 10y
- Given the target 11.5 return, the proportion
that must be invested in the fund is determined
as follows - 11.5 8 10y
-
15Chapter 6 Problem 21
- 11.5 8 10y
- 10y 11.5 8
- 10y (11.5 8) / 10
- y 0.35
- The standard deviation of the portfolio would
thus be 9.8 (.35 x 28). Achieving the 11.5
return can be done with a standard deviation of
9.8 in my portfolio as opposed to 17.5 in the
passive portfolio.
16Chapter 6 Problem 21
- b) Show your client the maximum fee you could
charge that would still leave him/her at least as
well off investing in your fund. (Hint the fee
will lower the slope of the CAL by reducing E(r)
net of the fee. - The fee would reduce the reward-to-variability
ratio (CAL slope). Clients will be indifferent
if the slope of the after-fee CAL and the CML are
equal.
17Chapter 6 Problem 21
- Let f denote the fee
- Slope of the CAL with the fee
- (18 8 f) / 28
- (10 f) / 28
- Slope of the CML (no fee required)
- (13 8) / 25 .20
- We must set the slopes to be equal.
18Chapter 6 Problem 21
- (10 f) / 28 0.20
- (10 f) 28 x 0.20
- (10 f) 5.6
- f 10 5.6
- f 4.4
- Therefore the maximum fee that can be charged to
make the client indifferent between portfolios is
4.4 per year.
19Portfolio Selection Problem
- You are considering investing 1,000 in a
T-bill that pays 0.05 and a risky portfolio, P,
constructed with two risky securities, X and Y.
The weights of X and Y in P are 0.6 and 0.4,
respectively. X has an expected rate of return of
0.14 and variance of 0.01, and Y has an expected
rate of return of 0.10 and a variance of 0.0081.
20Portfolio Selection Problem
- If you want to form a portfolio with an
expected rate of return of 10, what percentages
of your money must you invest in the t-bill, X,
and Y respectively if you keep X and Y in the
same proportions to each other as in portfolio P
(6040). - E(r) Portfolio (0.6 x 14) (0.4 x 10)
- E(r) T-bill w x 5
21Portfolio Selection Problem
22Portfolio Selection Problem
Weighting by Asset T-Bill 32.4 X (67.6 x
.6) 40.6 Y (67.6 x .4) 27
23Portfolio Selection Problem
- What would be the dollar value of your
position in X, Y, and the t-bills, respectively
if you decide to hold a portfolio that has an
expected outcome of 1,120 - HPR (1,120 - 1,000) / 1,000
- HPR 12
24Portfolio Selection Problem
25Portfolio Selection Problem
T-Bill 5.4 X (94.6 x .6) 56.8 Y
(94.6 x .4) 37.8
T-Bill (5.4 x 1,000) 54 X (56.8 x
1,000) 568 Y (37.8 x 1,000) 378