Parity Violation in Strong Interactions - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Parity Violation in Strong Interactions

Description:

Wu. et al. Physical Review 105(4), 1957. Garwin. et al. ... This trend is in accord with theory since should be of opposite sign than. 10. STAR Preliminary ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:51
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 13
Provided by: dhev3
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Parity Violation in Strong Interactions


1
Parity Violation in Strong Interactions
Dhevan Gangadharan UCLA STAR Collaboration DNP
meeting 10/25/08
2
Outline
  • Examples of Weak Parity Violation
  • The Theory of Parity Violation in the strong
    interactions
  • The STAR experimental result
  • Outlook/Conclusions

3
Examples of Weak Parity Violation
Beta decay of Co-60
In flight Pion decay
Electrons are preferentially emitted opposite the
spin of the nucleus
Muons are preferentially polarized along the
direction of the Pions motion
e-
e-
S
Wu. et al. Physical Review 105(4), 1957
Garwin. et al. Physical Review, 105(4), 1957
4
Spontaneous Parity Violation in Strong
Interactions
This can occur through The Chiral Magnetic
Effect
Kharzeev et al. arXiv 0808.3382
  • The Chiral Magnetic Effect
  • Ingredient 1of 2
  • The Vacuum Structure undergoes a Transition

Sphaleron
5
  • The Chiral Magnetic Effect
  • Ingredient 2 of 2
  • A Non-zero background Magnetic field

Spectator nucleons create a Magnetic Field
6
  • The Chiral Magnetic Effect
  • As a consequence
  • An Electric Field parallel to the Magnetic Field
    is created

7
  • The Chiral Magnetic Effect
  • The End Result
  • The Electric Field will cause charge separation
    relative to the reaction plane
  • Charge separation represents an E-M current
    perpendicular to the reaction plane

For a given topological charge the E-M current
direction has a preference. This is Parity
Violation
8
Looking for Charge Separation
  • Transitions to -1 Topological charge are just as
    likely.
  • 1 and -1 states yield opposite E-M currents.
  • Charge separation is given by a ? 0 in
  • However, will vanish
    when averaged over many events because of the
    equal presence of 1 and -1 states.
  • Thus, one must use correlation techniques

S. A. Voloshin, Phys. Rev. C 70, 057901 (2004)
9
The STAR detector at RHIC
Tracking of particles is done by the TPC (light
grey region) AuAu 200 GeV collisions used for
this analysis.
10
STAR Preliminary
More plots of this correlator with different
systems and against different variables can be
found at arXiv0806.0029
  • Opposite charge combinations show a distinctly
    different trend than same charge combinations.
  • This trend is in accord with theory since
    should be of opposite sign than

11
Next..
  • Rule out non-P violating contributions to our
    observable (Our correlator is a P-even quantity)
  • Reconstructed particles (?, ?) can be used to
    replace particle a in
  • to determine whether the same asymmetry persists.
    This is interesting since in principle the
    electric field generated can affect all three
    constituent quarks before they coalesce. A ?
    contains 3 negative quarks whereas a ? contains a
    mixture of positive and negative quarks.

?bar
?
12
Conclusions
  • Heavy-Ion collisions might create Spontaneous
    Parity violating processes in Strong
    Interactions.
  • The gross quantitative and qualitative features
    of the correlation used in this analysis are in
    accord with theoretical expectations.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com