Title: E' Tsitrone, J' Roth, A' Loarte, J' Pamla
1 E. Tsitrone, J. Roth, A. Loarte, J. Paméla
The EU-PWI Task ForceTask agreements for 2008
- EU PWI TF under new EFDA
- Task Agreements and preferential support for
2008 - Whats next ?
2The EU-PWI Task Force under new EFDA
EU PWI TF remains a TF under new EFDA (access
to financial support ?TGs)
EU Task Force on Plasma-Wall Interaction Annual
Meeting of Contact Persons from 23
associations Defines priority issues ? Special
Expert Working Groups
Voluntary Physics Programme 3 year work programme
with 23 associations
Technological Programme 27 EFDA Tasks (art 5.1a
or 5.1b) for 2003-2006
Annual Task Agreements (general support)
Selected activities within TA eligible for
preferential support
3New tools under new EFDA Task agreements
- New managerial tool for SEWG leaders
- Clear set of objectives defined annually
- Work breakdown between associations (art 5)
- NB Includes JET activities agreed with JET EFDA
leader, but under art 6
- Deliverables report by each association
involved JET (SEWG meetings) final report by
SEWG leader (PWI TF meeting)
- Financial support mostly general support
(20 )? Selected activities preferential
support ( 40 )
- No EFDA contract implementation through
contract of association (CoA) - No heavy administration, only Preferential
Support to be approved at CCEFU.
4New tools under new EFDA Preferential support
and mobility
- Preferential support New for TF (0.5 ppy)
and SEWG (0.25 ppy) leadershipAvailable for
activities selected by SEWG leaders within TAs
collaborative work (joint experiments,
hardware exchange ) specific hardware
(diagnostics ) high priority issues (Be, T )
Detailed specifications( EFDA techno tasks)
Milestones, deliverables, deadlines final
written report by associations involvedCeiling
for total amount of ppy/budgetFinal selection
between associations proposals by EFDA TF
leadership
- Mobility SEWG and TF meetingscollaborative
work (joined experiments)
510 Task Agreements for 2008
6Objectives and 2008 work programme SEWG Gas
Balance and Fuel Retention
- I Retention with non carbon ITER materials
- Carbon / ITER like wall (JET) complete database
with carbon - Carbon / full W (AUG) characterize retention in
full W - Be/ W / mixed materials (PSI devices)
- II Discrepancy between particle balance / post
mortem analysis - Extensive post mortem analysis of PFCs vs
integrated particle balance - ( assess uncertainties on both methods)
- Task agreement consolidation of post-mortem
analysis with gas balance - Preferential support coordinated post mortem
analysis of tokamaks PFCs - III Multi-machine scaling of retention
- Start with available data and run joint
experiments to complete the database - Compare the scaling obtained with modelling for
identification of retention mechanisms. - Task agreement multi machine scaling of fuel
retention to ITER - Preferential support joint experiments ? multi
machine scaling of fuel retention
7Objectives and 2008 work programme SEWG
Fuel Removal
- I Advance chemical/photonic cleaning towards an
ITER relevant system - Improved removal rates with reduced collateral
damage in situ in a tokamak - Optimisation of flash-lamp (removal rate) and
laser (co-deposit ? volatile) - Quantify impact of metallic impurities in
co-deposits on removal rates - Preferential support coordinated surface
analysis of treated samples (deposits - remaining after cleaning and damage to bulk
material) - II Demonstrate removal of co-deposit in tile gaps
with all technologies - considered
- III Compatibility of Be with O cleaning methods
- Evaluate impact of repetitive oxidising plasmas
(GDC/RF) on Be bulk - Demonstrate Be/O removal rates (for
post-oxidation recovery) - Compare nitrogen/oxygen (effect on codeposition,
removal rate, impact on Be) - Task agreement treatment of metallic surfaces
(Be) with oxidising plasmas for - fuel removal
- Preferential support Compatibility of Be with
O cleaning methods - Impact of repetitive exposure of Be to oxidising
plasmas - Treatment of oxidised Be samples with glow or RF
plasmas (He, Ar ) to establish cleaning rates
and assess removed material.
8Objectives and 2008 work programme SEWG
Dust
I Characterization of dust in existing devices
(post mortem analysis) Sampling of dust in
different devices for analysis (size
distribution, shape, composition, specific
surface area) vs operating modes, maintenance
etc II. Initial assessment of dust generation
for ITER standard scenario with existing models
(not validated) III. Initial assessment of
diagnostics techniques a) During plasmas and
disruptions (visible, IR, CCD cameras, Rayleigh
scattering) Initial assessment for electrostatic
detectors and capacitive microbalance b) Between
plasmas (Mie scattering after gas injection) c)
Calibration for dust diagnostics assessment of
best technique to be selected (laser ablation,
pellets, mobile sieve, etc) d) Specifications for
proposal of a future diagnostic implementation
under preferential support Task agreements
joint measurements of dust in different
devices. Preferential support Coordinated
analysis of dust from different
devices Diagnostic exchange between devices for
joint characterization of dust during plasmas
(fast cameras)
9Objectives and 2008 work programme SEWG
Chemical erosion and transport (I)
Chemical Erosion
10Objectives and 2008 work programme SEWG
Chemical erosion and transport (II)
Transport
11Objectives and 2008 work programme SEWG
High Z materials
12Objectives and 2008 work programme SEWG ITER
like material mix
13Objectives and 2008 work programme SEWG
Transient heat loads and mitigation
- Determination of ELM and Disruption transient
loads - Optimisation of measurements of power/particle
fluxes during mitigated and unmitigated ELMs and
disruptions by interchange of diagnostics
sharing of analysis techniques/software - Determination of Type I ELM power/particle
fluxes to PFCs in coordinated experiments
(dimensionless pedestal identity and r/n scans)
? Model validation ITER extrapolation - Determination of disruption power/particle
fluxes to PFCs in coordinated experiments (Type
I ELMy H-mode,VDEs, ITB collapse, etc.) ?
identification of main physics processes and
development of scaling laws models for
extrapolation to ITER - Mitigation of transient loads during ELMs and
disruptions - Develop common base for evaluation of mitigation
effectiveness for - disruptions thermal quench runaway
suppression by MGI, current quench runaway
suppression by ECRH ? initial assessment of
feasibility/application to ITER - ELM mitigation by pellets in comparable Type I
ELMy H-modes ? initial assessment of
feasibility/application to ITER
14Whats next ?
What already happened in 2007 STAC Feb 2007
highlights 2006 midterm work program STAC May
2007 TAs and preferential support for 2008
approved.? To be implemented when new EFDA in
force
Ceiling for preferential support for 2008 17
ppy and 300 kEuros
- Whats next ? Call to be launched soon
- Objectives
- confirmation of work offered by Associations in
2006-2008 WP (through the draft TAs) - additional contributions as needed
- opportunity for new Associations to join the
programme - preferential support (under precise
specifications)
- To be sent to HRUs contact persons
- 10 drafts of TAs associations fill up proposals
for participation associated resources
- 1 draft for all activities proposed for
preferential support associations encouraged to
send common detailed proposal (coordinated by
SEWG leaders)
15Example of draft TA multi machine scaling of
fuel retention
Confirm (or suppress !) activity
Fill up associated resources
Propose new contribution
16Summary
The EU PWI TF remains a TF under new EFDAAdded
value of the TF recognized increased
collaborative framework (joined experiments,
common analysis, scientists exchange) focus on
ITER priority issuesNew tools task
agreements, preferential support,
mobilityImplementation started for 2008
transition year (phasing CoA and TF WP
) Questions (to Jerome ) welcome !