Title: POS 203: Introduction to Political Science 11042009
1POS 203 Introduction to Political Science
11/04/2009
- Course status.
- Paper Assignment 2 returned Friday.
- Class Agenda
- Presentations.
- Russia.
- Landman, Chapter 7.
- Discussion Questions
- Apply Landman Chapter 7 to Hauss Chapter 9.
- Critical Thinking Exercise 8 p. 258 Hauss.
Today, it could be argued that the Russian
president has too much influence both because of
the powers granted him by the Constitution and
the weakness of the opposition in the State Duma
and elsewhere. How has that affected politics
since Putin came to power? What has happened
since he has left the presidency?
2- Russia and Terrorism.
- War in Chechnya.
- BBC Chechnya.
- First Chechen War.
- 46,000 80000 dead.
- Second Chechen War.
- 30,000.
- Terrorist attacks w/n Russia.
- 2002 Hostage Theatre Moscow.
- 2004 Beslan School Hostage crisis.
- Russian Antiterror site.
- FSB, MVD and other security ministries.
3Terrorism Counterterrorism and Public Approval
Putin/Bush.
4Terrorism Counterterrorism and Public Approval
Bush1 Ruggles University of Minnesota (US).
5Russia Terrorism/Counterterrorism HR and
Lyall Landscapes.
- Chechnya Follow-up.
- Human Rights Watch.
- Russia/Chechnya index page.
- EU/Council of Europe/Committee for the Prevention
of Torture. - Most recent statement March 13, 2007.
- in some respects notably as regards material
conditions of detention - there had been definite
progress. - remains deeply concerned resort to torture
by members of law enforcement agencies and
security forces continues, as does the related
practice of unlawful detentions. - Politkovskaya - Profile of Ramzan Kadyrov.
- Inside the dragons lair Guardian (UK).
- Lyall Landscapes of Violence MPSA 2006.
- Northern Caucuses and Microgeographies of
conflict, conditions of recruitment.
6Russia Terrorism/Counterterrorism - Lyall.
- Lyall, Jason. 2006. Pocket Protests Rhetorical
Coercion and the Micropolitics of Collective
Action in Semiauthoritarian. World Politics. 58
(April), 378-412. - Putin archetype of smart authoritarians who
restrict liberties without provoking backlash or
undermining economic growth.
7Russia Terrorism/Counterterrorism Lyall2.
8Russia Terrorism/Counterterrorism Lyall3
9Russia Terrorism/Counterterrorism Lyall 4.
10Russia Counterterrorism - 2.
- Siloviki in the Putin Administration Olga
Kryshtanovskayas Figures. Russian Analytical
Digest. No. 17. March 20, 2007.
11Russia Counterterrorism - 4.
- Siloviki Kryshtanovskayas Figures - 3.
12Russia Counterterrorism - 6.
- Siloviki Kryshtanovskayas Figures - 5.
13Russia Counterterrorism 8 2006 CT
Law/Public Opinion-1.
- Russias New Counter-terrorism Law. Russian
Analytical Digest. No. 2. June 20, 2006.
14Russia Counterterrorism - 9.
- Russias New Counter-terrorism Law. 2.
15Russia Counterterrorism - 9.
- Russias New Counter-terrorism Law. 3.
16Russia Counterterrorism - 9.
- Russias New Counter-terrorism Law. 4.
17Russia Counterterrorism - 9.
- Russias New Counter-terrorism Law. 5.
18Russia Counterterrorism - 9.
- Russias New Counter-terrorism Law. 6.
19Russia Counterterrorism - 9.
- Russias New Counter-terrorism Law. 6.
20- Landman Chapter 7
- Three interrelated research questions.
- Why do people rebel?
- Which sectors of society are more likely to
rebel? - What factors contribute to successful revolution?
- Why do people rebel?
- Individual, structural and cultural factors.
- Relative deprivation.
- General levels of inequality.
- Rational responses to changing economic
conditions. - Moral outrage at injustice.
- Structural composition of primary export
economies characteristic of lesser developed
countries. - What Sectors?
- Types of groups - focus on peasants.
21- Landman Chapter 7
- What factors contribute to successful revolution?
- Key explanatory factors.
- Comparisons show great variance in factors that
account for political violence and successful
revolution. - Comparing many countries.
- Gurr operationalizes notion of relative
deprivation through separate measures of
persisting deprivation and short term
deprivation, the coercive potential of states,
levels of institutionalization, degree of
political legitimacy, and general
socio-structural features of facilitation. - Political dissent magnitude of civil strife
combined measure of demonstrations, political
strikes, riots, local rebellions, assassinations,
coups, mutinies, plots, purges, widespread
revolts. - Deprivation related to magnitude of civil strife.
22 23- Landman Chapter 7
- Many country studies continued.
- Hibbs goes through elaborate hypothesis testing
exercise summarized on Table 7.1. - Then develops elaborate multivariate causal
model. - Main conclusions.
- Past levels of political violence.
- Presence of societal cleavages.
- Low levels of repression.
- Absence of communist totalitarian regime.
- Low theoretical payoff.
- Paige.
- Focuses on rebellion in rural agrarian sector.
- Agrarian sector is unit of analysis.
- Finding violent activities revolutionary/nationali
st movements highly correlated with sharecropping
and migratory labor.
24 25- Landman Chapter 7
- Many country studies continued.
- Siegelman and Simpson.
- Indicators of inequality and political violence.
- Inequality measured by Gini index.
- Tests linear and non-linear forms of relationship
between income inequality and violence. - Positive linear relationship is discovered.
- Support for other relationships.
- Summarizing many country studies.
- Some form of grievance generated by imbalance
manifests itself in political violence. - Direct relationship between imbalance and
violence is mediated by other important factors. - Main weakness of studies nation state as unit of
analysis.
26 27 28 29 30- Midterm Exams.
- Key Terms Abbreviations.
- Sig significance.
- Det details.
- Spec. Ex. Specific Example.
- Ex. example.
- Grade on inside front cover is out of 100 points.
- 90 cut off for A- 87.5 cut off for B 82.5
below B- 80 below C - Next class, November 11th, 2009.
- Apply Landman Chapter 11 to Hauss Chapter 10.
- Hauss Critical Thinking Exercise 7 China has
reformed its economy but not its political system
perestroika without glasnost. Has it worked
better than reform in the former Soviet Union?
Why (or why not)?