RESTORING THE ANACOSTIA - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 14
About This Presentation
Title:

RESTORING THE ANACOSTIA

Description:

Fulfilling potential requires new approach. June 14, 2006. Anacostia Restoration Governance ... Staffed by COG. Discussion. Consideration of Resolution R28 ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:20
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 15
Provided by: tedgr3
Learn more at: https://www.mwcog.org
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: RESTORING THE ANACOSTIA


1
RESTORING THE ANACOSTIA
  • Regional Impact Local Challenges

Governance Recommendations to the COG Board June
14, 2006
2
The Anacostia Watershed
  • As It Is
  • Highly polluted but outstanding potential
  • Impacts both regional local water quality
  • Localized progress over twenty years
  • Fulfilling potential requires new approach
  • Fundamental Needs
  • Higher-Level Coordination
  • Comprehensive Plan
  • In early stages
  • Greater funding access
  • Proposed Solutions
  • Leadership Council
  • Adopt Plan by Council
  • Coordinated approach

3
Timeline
  • 3/05 Member/Stakeholder Retreat
  • 12/05 Report Recommendation
  • 2/06 Referral to CBPC
  • 5/06 CBPC Recommendation
  • 6/14/06 Board Consideration

4
Chesapeake Anacostia Watersheds
Chesapeake Area 64,000 sq. mi. Population
16,300,000
Anacostia Area 176 sq. mi. (0.3) Population
800,000 (4.9)
4
5
DC
Hains Point
National Airport
VA
MD
  • Discharges
  • Upper Estuary
  • Below Hains Point
  • Across from National Airport

5
6
Urban Development
Washington D.C.
Sediment
Potomac River
Anacostia River
6
7
The Anacostias Problems
  • Causes
  • Uncontrolled stormwater runoff
  • Sewer overflows
  • Effects
  • High bacteria
  • Low oxygen levels
  • Erosion sediment
  • Toxics
  • Trash
  • Degraded habitat

8
The Problems
8
9
The Vision
9
10
Cooperative Agreements
  • Four signatories
  • Increasingly specific
  • 1987 Pledge to cooperate
  • 1991 Six broad goals
  • 1999 Provisional restoration targets
  • 2001 50 specific targets for 2010

11
Restoration Potential
  • To Fulfill the Vision
  • Executive-level Leadership Council
  • Comprehensive Plan
  • Expected Outcomes
  • Timetable, with resources, to get the job done
  • Accelerated implementation
  • Stronger Partnership
  • Better access to restoration funding

11
12
Governance Framework
Leadership Council Executive Officials
New
Steering Comm. Policy Officials
Existing
Restoration Committee Technical Staff
Management Committee Technical Staff
Advisory Subcommittees
Advisory Subcommittees
12
13
Membership Responsibilities
  • Leadership Council
  • (Executive Officials)
  • Core Members
  • Mayor
  • County Executives
  • Governor
  • EPA
  • Corps of Engineers
  • Others as determined by Council
  • Responsibilities
  • Adoption of Comprehensive Plan
  • Oversight accountability
  • Budget approval
  • Staffed by COG
  • Anacostia Fund
  • Incentive grants
  • Steering Committee
  • (Policy Officials)
  • Core Agencies
  • Others as determined by Council
  • Municipalities
  • Other federal agencies
  • NGOs
  • Responsibilities
  • Interagency policy coordination
  • Policy guidance to staff
  • Budget recommendation
  • Staffed by COG

14
DiscussionConsideration of Resolution R28-06
14
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com