Pol 168: Latin@ Politics - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 41
About This Presentation
Title:

Pol 168: Latin@ Politics

Description:

What is Latino Politics Research? ... Attention: US-born more attentive than non US-born in survey (p=.00, two-tail). Other Results ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:60
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 42
Provided by: bsjj
Category:
Tags: latin | pol | politics | survey

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Pol 168: Latin@ Politics


1
Pol 168 Latin_at_ Politics
  • Professor B. Jones
  • Dept. of Political Science
  • UC-Davis
  • Fall 2009

2
What is Latino Politics Research?
  • Academic focus on race/ethnic politics typically
    on African-Americans
  • which seems natural given historical
    circumstances.
  • But as a separate field, Latino Politics has seen
    considerable growth
  • But what is it?

3
Central Issues and Themes in Political Science
Research on Latinos
  • Identity Politics and Community
  • Do Latinos Exist? (Dominguez 1994)
  • Blurred distinction between race and ethnicity
  • The concept of Latino is an American concept
  • As such, it is sort of a clearinghouse term
  • Sometimes, hard to know what it means
  • Is there a Latino Vote?

4
The Latino Vote
  • Courting the Latino Vote
  • Analysis from CBS news (from 7/08 but basic
    points relevant) http//www.youtube.com/watch?vtK
    OQ96diBNQ
  • So what is the Latino vote?
  • BTW, California Field Poll August 2009 21 of
    registered voters are Latino.

5
Identity Politics
  • A bloc implies identity?
  • A prominent research question is the extent to
    which Latinos have common interests
  • Share a community
  • Have a common identity
  • In literature on Af.-Americans, a prominent theme
    is the concept of linked fate.

6
Linked Fate
  • Linked fate represents a stage of identification
    that starts with a feeling of closeness to others
    who identify with the group label and involves
    the acceptance of the belief that individual life
    chances are inextricably tied to the group as a
    whole (Simien, Journal of Black Studies, 35
    529-550)
  • Dawson, M. C. (1994). Behind the mule Race and
    class in African American politics. Princeton,
    NJ Princeton University Press.
  • Does a similar concept apply to Latinos? Why? Why
    not?
  • Does such a thing need to exist to sustain Latino
    identity?

7
Shared Identity
  • Do Guatemalans identify with Mexicans?
  • Or El Salvadorans, Hondurans, Cubans, Chileans,
    Colombians, Puerto Ricans, Venezuelans,
    Argentinians, ?
  • And all as Latino?
  • Probably Not
  • but does this preclude the possibility of Latino
    Identity?

8
Latino Identity
  • Mobilization and Collective Action Research
    important here! (Why an important question?)
  • Social Movement research important too.
  • Can these things evoke identity?
  • Importance of people like César Chávez

9
Latino Identity
  • The role Latino politicians play is important?
  • Do they, can they serve as bonding agents in
    the Latino community?
  • We will learn about the importance of
    descriptive representation later in the
    quarter.
  • But lets take a quick sidetrip CHC
  • http//velazquez.house.gov/chc/
  • Is a Latino Identity possible?

10
Latino Identity
  • What factors might promote identity?
  • Language? Cultural mores? Shared political
    interests?
  • Could immigration issue serve as a bonding
    agent?
  • or is it all just a who cares question?!
  • Flip the question around?
  • What if non-Latinos perceived a Latino Identity?

11
Perceptions of Identity
  • If viewed as a group by out-group members, what
    are the implications?
  • Have Latinos been tethered to the immigration
    issue?
  • Springfield, TN http//www.youtube.com/watch?vXc
    ov24pcHgA
  • Is there an us vs. them mentality in the
    U.S.?
  • If so, where do we find it?
  • Brief detour Social Identity Theorythis will
    help us understand how identities can be
    activated.

12
Social Identity Theory
  • Originally developed by psychologist Henri Tajfel
    and developed further with John Turner
  • Seeks to identify conditions under which
    identities emerge.
  • Note they need not always be present
  • As such, group-based conflict may ebb and flow.

13
Social Identity Theory
14
Predictions of Discriminatory Behavior/Attitudes
from Social Identity Theory
15
Tajfels Continuum
16
Social Identity Theory
  • The notion of value threat (Branscombe et al
    1999)
  • Status Hierarchy
  • Context Important
  • Are conditions in place or nearly in place to
    predict Latino collective action?
  • Are we seeing signs of backlash toward Latinos?
  • If so, will this promote some kind of Latino
    Identity?
  • This is an issue in Latino politics research.
  • Lets think about what political identity might
    look like?

17
Latino Identity
  • Some Data Analysis
  • 2006 Latino National Survey
  • Latinos sense of commonality with Latinos

18
Latino Commonality
19
Latino Linked Fate
  • Why might Latinos have a sense of linked fate?
  • First off, what is it??
  • Does the concept apply to Latinos
  • 2006 LNS Data
  • How much does doing well depend on other
    Latinos also doing well?

20
Linked Fate
21
Latino Linked Fate
Do Latinos see their futures, and those of their national origin group, linked to that of other Latinos? YES Do Latinos see their futures, and those of their national origin group, linked to that of other Latinos? YES Do Latinos see their futures, and those of their national origin group, linked to that of other Latinos? YES Do Latinos see their futures, and those of their national origin group, linked to that of other Latinos? YES Do Latinos see their futures, and those of their national origin group, linked to that of other Latinos? YES Do Latinos see their futures, and those of their national origin group, linked to that of other Latinos? YES Do Latinos see their futures, and those of their national origin group, linked to that of other Latinos? YES
Mex indiv. Mex group Cuban indiv. Cuban group PR indiv. PR group
Nothing 14.3 7.1 18.4 13.4 22.1 11.3
Little 15.3 13.2 11.9 8.6 15.3 14.1
Some 24.6 25.8 20.5 22.2 21.7 28.5
A Lot 39.2 46.8 36.3 43.7 34.1 38.5
How much does your doing well depend on other Latinos/Hispanics also doing well? How much does national origin doing well ? How much does your doing well depend on other Latinos/Hispanics also doing well? How much does national origin doing well ? How much does your doing well depend on other Latinos/Hispanics also doing well? How much does national origin doing well ? How much does your doing well depend on other Latinos/Hispanics also doing well? How much does national origin doing well ? How much does your doing well depend on other Latinos/Hispanics also doing well? How much does national origin doing well ? How much does your doing well depend on other Latinos/Hispanics also doing well? How much does national origin doing well ? How much does your doing well depend on other Latinos/Hispanics also doing well? How much does national origin doing well ?
22
Contributing Factors to Latino Linked Fate
  • Perceived commonality1 Latino Linked
    Fate
  • Nativity
    67.4/62.9
  • Language Use
    67.9/61.7
  • Linked fate w/ African. Amer.
    74.3/58.6
  • Partisan Identity 74.5/61.2
  • Linked fate w/ Latinos
    73.7/46.1
  • Race/ethnicity of co-workers
    66.6/63.3

1 The set of percentages represents Latino
respondents who indicated some or a lot of
commonality for native/foreign born,
English/Spanish speakers. For the linked fate
percentages, it is some/a lot vs. little/nothing.
For partisan, it is partisans vs. non-partisans.
And coworkers represent mixed group of coworkers
vs. only Latinos.
23
Levels of Pan Ethnicity and ConnectednessOf
Ones Subgroup to Other Latinos
  • One-half of LNS Latinos perceive a lot of
    commonalities with ones group and other Latinos
  • Stronger pan-ethnic identifiers are more inclined
    to see this connection.
  • Over three- fourths of the combined stronger
    pan-ethic identifiers see their own national
    origin group as having a similar fate with other
    Latinos
  • (This slide is a part of an LNS ppt)

24
Linked Fate
  • Note differences by US born vs. non-US born
  • High level? Low level?
  • Implications of Pan-Ethnic Identity?

25
Pan-Ethnicity
  • Attempts to foster pan-ethnicitywhich presumably
    would foster perceptions of shared fatehave been
    widespread.
  • Quick History Lesson

26
Mobilization and Organization
  • Southwest Council of La Raza now
  • National Council on La Raza http//www.nclr.org/
  • Mexican American Legal Defense and Education Fund
  • http//www.maldef.org/
  • Two recent examples

27
Historical Groups
  • Orden de Los Hijos de Americana
  • La Alianza HispanoAmericano
  • 19th century groups
  • Focus in the southwest and was on Mexicanos
  • Population in-flux in early 20c prompted
    emergence of other groups.
  • 1927 League of United Latin American Citizens
    (LULAC)

28
LULAC
  • Website http//lulac.org/
  • Promoted cultural assimilation (language
    acquisition) and started the Little Schools of
    the 400 program (1950s)
  • Nonpartisan advocacy organization
  • Mass-based membership (Latinos generally)
  • There are group-specific organizations

29
Groups within Political Institutions
  • Congressional Hispanic Caucus
  • National Association of Latino Elected and
    Appointed Officials (NALEO)
  • http//www.naleo.org/
  • Formed in 1976
  • About 6000 members
  • Goals? Aims?
  • Southwest Voter Registration and Education
    Project (SVREP)
  • http//www.svrep.org/
  • More data (Pew 2004 survey)

30
Attention US-born more attentive than non
US-born in survey (p.00, two-tail).
31
Other Results
  • Mexican Origin slightly less attentive compared
    to non-Mexican origin.
  • Cuban Origin significantly more attentive to
    politics compared to non-Cubano
  • No significant differences in attentiveness for
    Central or South American descent.

32
Party Affiliation
  • Why care about party affiliation?
  • Closed primaries
  • Dominance of two-party system (like it or not)
  • Concerns about monolithic vote.
  • Is it fair to characterize Latino/as as a
    singular group?
  • Lets consider some data.

33
Identification All Respondents
34
Identification By Gender
35
Identification By Birthplace
36
Identification by Origin Mexican
  • Mexican Origin
  • About 14 percent identify REPUBLICAN
  • About 35 percent identify DEMOCRAT
  • About 26 percent identify INDEPENDENT
  • About 12 percent identify as SOMETHING ELSE
  • Take-away points?

37
Identification by Origin Cuba
  • Cuban Origin
  • About 47 percent identify REPUBLICAN
  • About 19 percent identify DEMOCRAT
  • About 17 percent identify INDEPENDENT
  • About 6 percent identify as SOMETHING ELSE
  • Take-away points?

38
Identification by Origin Puerto Rico
  • Puerto Rican Origin
  • About 16 percent identify REPUBLICAN
  • About 44 percent identify DEMOCRAT
  • About 17 percent identify INDEPENDENT
  • About 12 percent identify as SOMETHING ELSE
  • Take-away Points?

39
Identification Central American
  • Central American Origin
  • 14 percent REPUBLICAN
  • 32 percent DEMOCRAT
  • 31 percent INDEPENDENT
  • 6 percent SOMETHING ELSE
  • Leaners 47 percent DEM

40
Identification South American
  • South American Origin
  • 17 percent REPUBLICAN
  • 36 percent DEMOCRAT
  • 28 percent INDEPENDENT
  • 10 percent SOMETHING ELSE
  • Leaners 47 percent DEM

41
Implications of all of this?
  • Are Latino/as monolithic, in terms of
    partisanship?
  • What do these sliver of data suggest for the
    future? (If anything)
  • Why Care? Consider demographics of California
  • August 2009 CA. Field Poll
  • http//www.scribd.com/doc/18170956/August-2009-Fie
    ld-Poll
  • Republican 79 WNH
  • Democrat 55 WNH
  • Can we detect a political identity?
  • It seems clear, however, why Latinos matter!
  • We need to look at population statistics.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com