Financing Early Childhood Systems: - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 32
About This Presentation
Title:

Financing Early Childhood Systems:

Description:

For more information or questions, contact us at Project THRIVE. Websites of Interest ... Institute of Medicine/National Research Council. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:29
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 33
Provided by: tell83
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Financing Early Childhood Systems:


1
  • Financing Early Childhood Systems
  • Lessons from the Past and
  • Challenges for the Future
  • Kay Johnson, Project Director Project THRIVE at
    NCCP
  • Association of Maternal and Child Health Programs
  • (AMCHP) Annual Conference
  • March 7, 2006

2
  • Supported through a cooperative agreement with
    the Maternal and Child Health Bureau, HRSA-DHHS.

3
A Framework for Spending Smarter in State and
Local ECCS Initiatives
4
How are we doing in terms of financing early
childhood services?
5
Percentage of Children Less than Six Years Old,
By State, 2003-04
gt 40 37 - 39 34 36 32 - 33
Source US Current Population Survey, National
Center for Children in Poverty
6
Percentage of Young Children in Poverty, By
State, 2004
gt 40 37 - 39 34 36 30 - 33
7
Infant EPSDT Screens Referrals, Selected
States, FY 2003
Percent of infant who had at least one EPSDT
screen or a subsequent referral. Source Center
for Medicare and Medicaid Services www.cms.gov
8
EPSDT Participation Ratios, Children Ages 1 to
3, US, FY 2003
No data lt 60 70 69 80 79 gt80
Percent of one and two year olds who had at
least one EPSDT screen. Source Center for
Medicare and Medicaid Services www.cms.gov
9
EPSDT Referral Ratios, Children Ages 1 to 3, US,
FY 2003
No data lt 1 1-10 11-20 20-50 50-69 gt70
Percent of one and two year olds who had a
referral subsequent to EPSDT screen. Source
Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services
www.cms.gov
10
Financing for Child Development Services in
Medicaid Managed Care Plans, 1999
Source Berry, Butler, Budetti. Ambulatory
Child Health, 2001.
11
National HEDIS Results for Measure Well-Child
Visits in the First 5 Years of Life, 2004
Source NCQA 2000 HEDIS and HEDIS/CAHPS
www.ncqa.org
12
Medicaid Pays for Services to At-risk Children
with Social-Emotional Delay but no Diagnosis,
State Reporting, 2005
Yes (MDC 16 ) No (MDC 10) Dont know (MDC 6) Data
not available
Source Rosenthal and Kaye. State Approaches to
Promoting Young Childrens Healthy Mental
Development. NASHP/CMWF, 2005.
13
Percent of Infants Served by State Title V
Programs with Medicaid Coverage, FY 2002
No data lt 25 25-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65-74 gt
75
Source Title V Data System www.mchb.hrsa.gov
14
Primary Child Care Arrangements of Children lt Age
5 in Low-Income FamiliesParents working,
resident, high school education, income lt200 FPL
Source Capizzano, Adams, Ost. Caring for
Children of Color, Urban Institute, 2006.
15
Percentage of Infants and Toddlers Served in Part
C Early Intervention, By State, FY 04
lt 1.50 1.50 - 1.76 1.75 2.49 2.50
2.99 3.00 - 4.99 gt 5.0
Sources NECTAS, NCCIC, OSEP.
16
Percentage 3 4 Year Olds Enrolled in School, By
State, 2003
gt 60 50 59 40 44 45 49 gt40
Source Kids Count. www.aecf.org
17
Moving Ahead in Finance and Policy to Support
Comprehensive Early Childhood Systems
18
Spending Smarter A Funding Guide for
Policymakers to Promote Social and Emotional
Health and School Readiness Kay Johnson and Jane
Knitzer. National Center for Children in
Poverty, December 2005. Spending Smarter in
ECCS Kay Johnson and Jane Knitzer. Project
THRIVE Issue Brief 1. National Center for
Children in Poverty, February 2006.
19
Common Challenges linked to Financing
  • Restrictions on eligibility and benefits.
  • Failure to screen for and identify risks.
  • Lack of reimbursement for early intervention
    services without a diagnosed condition.
  • Services not accessible to uninsured parents.
  • Too few providers.
  • Gaps between systems.

Sources Johnson and Knitzer, 2005. Johnson and
Kaye, 2003 Johnson and Knitzer, 2002.
20
Maximize Medicaid/EPSDT
  • Recommend age appropriate screening and
    diagnostic tools in EPSDT.
  • Cover services delivered in a range of settings.
  • Separate billing for development screening and
    diagnostic evaluation.
  • Reimburse for parent-child (family) therapy.
  • Match funds for child care MH consultation.
  • Use appropriate diagnostic codes.

Source Spending Smarter. Johnson and Knitzer.
NCCP. 2005. www.nccp.org
21
Deficit Reduction Act of 2005
  • Eligibility
  • Premiums and cost-sharing
  • Benchmark coverage
  • Targeted case management

22
Title V MCH Block Grant
  • Use ECCS planning to assess fiscal resources.
  • Include children with developmental, behavioral,
    or emotional challenges in definition of special
    needs (CSHCN).
  • Spend on services not covered by Medicaid.
  • Include social-emotional services in medical
    home initiatives.

Source Spending Smarter. Johnson and Knitzer.
NCCP. 2005. www.nccp.org
23
Other Health Mental Health Programs
  • Coverage mental health in SCHIP.
  • Explicitly include Community Health Centers.
  • Use childrens mental health grants.
  • Use community mental health centers as a hub for
    early childhood mental health consultation.

Source Spending Smarter. Johnson and Knitzer.
NCCP. 2005. www.nccp.org
24
Child Care
  • Blend child care quality funds to finance early
    childhood mental health consultation (e.g.,
    quality set aside)
  • Use CCDF to support training on social-emotional
    and school readiness.
  • Target funding to ensure highest risk get
    high-quality child care.

Source Spending Smarter. Johnson and Knitzer.
NCCP. 2005. www.nccp.org
25
Head Start Early Head Start
  • Support mental health consultation.
  • Finance training to enhance the skills of
    parent-involvement coordinators, parent
    educators, etc.
  • Fund additional support services and referral for
    vulnerable children and their families.

Source Spending Smarter. Johnson and Knitzer.
NCCP. 2005. www.nccp.org
26
IDEA Special Education Programs
  • Assure appropriate social-emotional screening,
    evaluation, and services in Part C.
  • Extend Part C eligibility to infants and toddlers
    with social-emotional conditions and risks.
  • Build a continuum of services from 0-5, focusing
    state expenditures.

Source Spending Smarter. Johnson and Knitzer.
NCCP. 2005. www.nccp.org
27
Use Programs Serving Young Children and Families
At High Risk
  • Develop and fund a systematic approach for
    referral and assessment of young children who
    have experienced abuse or neglect and/or
    witnessed domestic violence. (CAPTA)
  • Use TANF for family counseling, coordination,
    substance abuse treatment, and family support.
  • Transfer TANF funds to the CCDF or the SSBG to
    fund activities in child care and family support.

Source Spending Smarter. Johnson and Knitzer.
NCCP. 2005. www.nccp.org
28
Top Ten Things To Do Now
  • Review current funding.
  • Maintain and/or improve current programs.
  • Support strategies with interagency plans and
    agreements.
  • Mobilize resources to serve at-risk.
  • Blend dollars for cross-training professionals.
  • Use flexibility of smaller federal grant
    programs.
  • Clarify eligibility and payment mechanisms among
    Medicaid, Part C, Title V, mental health, etc.
  • Adopt billing mechanisms for developmental
    services.
  • Target one high-risk population.
  • Finance parent-child interventions.

29
Together we can build coordinated systems of
care to help our youngest children be ready to
THRIVE.
30
For more information or questions, contact us at
Project THRIVE
646-284-9644 ext. 6456 Thrive_at_nccp.org
31
Websites of Interest
  • Commonwealth Fund -- www.cmwf.org
  • National Academy for State Health Policy --
    www.nashp.org
  • National Center for Children in Poverty --
    www.nccp.org
  • State Early Childhood Policy Technical Assistance
    Network -- www.finebynine.org
  • School Readiness Indicators Initiative --
    www.gettingready.org

32
Selected References
  • American Academy of Pediatrics, Committee on
    Children and Disabilities. Developmental
    surveillance and screening for infants and young
    children. Pediatrics. 2001108(1)192-6.
  • Bruner C, Floyd S, and Copeman A. (2003). State
    Early Childhood Policy Technical Assistance
    Network - Financing School Readiness Strategies
    An Annotated Bibliography. Des Moines, IA Child
    and Family Policy Center.
  • Institute of Medicine/National Research Council.
    From Neurons to Neighborhoods The Science of
    Early Childhood Development. Shonkoff and
    Phillips, (eds), Washington, DC National Academy
    Press, 2000.
  • Johnson and Kaye, Using Medicaid to Support Young
    Childrens Healthy Mental Development, National
    Academy for State Health Policy, Portland, ME,
    2003.
  • Johnson, Knitzer, and Kaufmann. Making Dollars
    Follow Sense Financing Early Childhood Mentla
    Health Services to Promote Healthy Social and
    Emotional Development in Young Children. New
    York NCCP, 2002.
  • Johnson and Knitzer. Spending Smarter A funding
    guide for policymakers and advocates to promote
    social and emotional health and school readiness.
    New York NCCP, 2005.
  • Kauffman Early Education Exchange. Set for
    Success Building a strong foundation for school
    readiness based on the social-emotional
    development of young children. Kansas City The
    Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation, 2002.
  • Knitzer. Building Services and Systems to
    Support the Healthy Emotional Development of
    Young Children An action guide for policymakers.
    New York NCCP, 2002.
  • Markus A, Rosenbaum S, Stewart A, and Cox M. How
    Medical Claims Simplification can Impede Delivery
    of Child Development Services. New York
    Commonwealth Fund. 2005.
  • Perkins, J. Olson, K. (1999). Medicaid Early
    and Periodic Screening, Diagnosis and Treatment
    as a Source of Funding Early Developmental
    Services. National Health Law Program.
  • VanLandeghem K, Curtis D, and Abrams M. (2002).
    Reasons and Strategies for Strengthening
    Childhood Development Services in the Healthcare
    System. Portland, ME National Academy for State
    Health Policy.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com