Lifting III - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 38
About This Presentation
Title:

Lifting III

Description:

RWL = LC x HM x VM x DM x AM x FM x CM. Step 3. Compute the Lifting Index ... Vertical Multiplier (VM) Lift Distance (cm) (in) Distance Multiplier (DM) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:56
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 39
Provided by: radz9
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Lifting III


1
Lifting III
Rad Zdero, Ph.D. zradovan_at_uoguelph.ca University
of Guelph
2
Outline
  • Lifting Limits Injury
  • NIOSH Principles
  • NIOSH Analysis
  • NIOSH Graphs
  • NIOSH Examples

3
Lifting Limits Injury
4
Lifting
5
Some Low Back Injury Stats
  • Overexertion claimed to be cause of low back pain
    (LBP) by over 60 of sufferers less than 1/3 of
    these return to work
  • 2/3 overexertion injuries involve lifting
  • 1/5 overexertion injuries involve pushing or
    pulling
  • 30 of WCB claims relate to LBP
  • Lost wages, medical treatment, lost
    productivity
  • 72 billion/yr (U.S.) and 5.7 billion/yr
    (Canada)
  • need for scientific research to understand the
    mechanics of LBP to highlight its predisposing
    factors

6
(No Transcript)
7
Lifting Limits
8
NIOSH Principles
9
What is NIOSH?
  • National Institute for Occupational Safety
    Health (U.S. government agency)
  • Standard guidebooks
  • Work Practices Guide to Manual Lifting (NIOSH,
    1981)
  • Applications Manual for the Revised NIOSH Lifting
    Equation (Waters et al., 1993 and 1994)
  • Developed an occupational lifting formula to
    compute Recommended Weight Limit
  • Big influence on worker safety and health issues

10
NIOSH Recommendations
  • Smooth Lifting no sudden jerky motions
  • Objects Size moderate width with hand separation
    lt 75 cm
  • Posture unrestricted with no torso bracing
  • Coupling secure handles low shoe-floor
    slippage
  • Temperature favourable for lifting
  • Horizontal Location Center-of-Mass of
    object/handles to Ankles
  • Vertical Location Center-of-Mass of
    object/handles to Floor
  • Vertical Travel distance traveled by hands from
    start to finish of lift
  • Frequency of lifting average lifts / minute
    during the time period
  • Asymmetry angle from center-of-mass to bodys
    midline from start to finish of lift
  • Coupling of load three types of object
    grasping (good, fair, poor)

11
Basis for NIOSH
  • NIOSH analysis was developed for 3 different
    population norms that would protect 90 of
    workers
  • Biomechanically L5/S1 forces should be lt 3400 N.
  • Physiologically metabolic energy expenditures
    should be below predicted levels (e.g. lt 4.7
    Kcal/min for lift that has duration lt 1 hour and
    object height lt 75 cm from ground).
  • Psychophysically subjective worker estimates
    would accommodate 75 of women and 99 of men (or
    90 of a mix of men and women performing a
    lifting task).

12
NIOSH Analysis
13
NIOSH The Lift
14
NIOSH The Equation
15
NIOSH The Factors
Note 0 lt all multiplier values lt 1. If
calculated value gt1.0, then use 1.0
16
Lifting Index
  • After RWL is computed, it is compared with the
    actual weight W of the object being lifted.
  • Comparison is made at the origin and destination
    of a lift
  • Larger of the two values is considered the
    stress level of a lift
  • LI lt 1.0 . protective of most workers
  • LI gt 3.0 . poses significant risk to most
    workers
  • 1.0 lt LI lt 3.0 . many jobs fall in this region
  • Jobs need to be either redesigned to minimize
    LI, otherwise need increased job screening, more
    careful training, and medical monitoring

17
(No Transcript)
18
NIOSH Pros
  • combination of data from 4 disciplines
    epidemiology, biomechanics, physiology, and
    ergonomics
  • comprehensive review of the literature
  • multiplicative nature of equation makes estimates
    conservative
  • easily measured parameters
  • each factor can be measured independently
  • useful tool in industry
  • good starting point for more complex cases

19
NIOSH Cons
  • single equation for all populations
  • suitable for most, but too high for some subjects
    (advanced age, weaker spines)
  • does not consider gender differences
  • focus only on lumbar spine
  • speed of lifting duration neglected
  • frequency multiplier is a physiological limit
  • only for two handed lifting technique

20
NIOSH Graphs
21
(No Transcript)
22
Vertical Multiplier (VM)
(cm)
(in)
Vertical Location
23
(No Transcript)
24
(No Transcript)
25
(No Transcript)
26
(No Transcript)
27
Coupling Multiplier (CM)
Good fingers wrap completely around object or
handles Fair only a few fingers grasp around
the object firmly Poor only a few fingers or
fingertips are partially under or around object
28
NIOSH Examples
29
(No Transcript)
30
(No Transcript)
31
(No Transcript)
32
(No Transcript)
33
(No Transcript)
34
(No Transcript)
35
(No Transcript)
36
(No Transcript)
37
(No Transcript)
38
Sources
  • Chaffin et al., Occupational Biomechanics, 1999.
  • NIOSH, Work Practices Guide to Manual Lifting,
    1981.
  • McGill, The biomechanics of low back injury
    implications on current practice in industry and
    the clinic, J.Biomechanics, 39(5)465-475, 1997.
  • Waters et al., Revised NIOSH equation for the
    design and evaluation of manual lifting tasks,
    Ergonomics, 36(7)749-776, 1993.
  • Waters et al., Applications Manual for the
    Revised NIOSH Lifting Equation, 1994.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com