Title: Theoretical Aspects of SpinDependent Tunneling
1Theoretical Aspects of Spin-Dependent Tunneling
2Introduction
- Aim Electron spin electronics spintronics
- Devices Spin valves, magnetic tunnel
transistors, MRAMs, planar tunnel junctions,
magnetic STM
Theoretical description First-principles
calculations (DFT), magnetism (LSDA), transport
(diffusive, ballistic)
3Outline
- Planar tunnel junctions
- Theoretical approaches
- Computational
- Examples
- Spin valve Co/Cu/Co
- Hot spots Ni/Vac/Ni
- Bias voltage Co/Vac/Co
- Interface structure Fe/MgO/Fe
- Outlook
4Planar tunnel junctions
Ferromagnetic leads L R
Insulating spacer S
Parallel alignment (P)
Antiparallel alignment (AP)
Ballistic transport thin spacer Measured
tunneling current I, conductance G Tunneling
magneto-resistance (TMR)
5Planar tunnel junctions II
- Tunneling magneto-resistance depends on
- Electronic magnetic properties of leads
spacer - Thickness of the spacer
- Structure of the interfaces
- Geometry
- Electronic structure
- Magnetic structure
- Orientation of the lead magnetizations
- Bias voltage
6Jullieres model
- Density of states N in the leads L R
- Polarization
- Optimistic TMR
- Conductance G(P) gt G(AP)
Parallel alignment (P)
Antiparallel alignment (AP)
Spacer properties completely ignored
7Jullieres model II
Slonczewskis extension
- Spacer step barrier
- Transmission polarization
8Landauer-Büttiker Approach
- Electronic structures
- Leads homogenous Green function
- Spacer transition operator
- Conductance
Scattering channels Bloch states
Scattering at the spacer
Sum over all scattering channels paths ? TMR
9Landauer-Büttiker Approach II
- Formulation in multiple-scattering theory
(layer-KKR MacLaren Butler) - Principal building blocks layer
- Typical LEED algorithms
- Transmission
- Conductance
- Most time consuming Brillouin-zone integration
Spacer scattering matrix
10Computational
- First-principles calculations
- Scalar-relativistic spin-polarized KKR (LSDA,
DFT) - Self-consistent electronic structure
- Band structure, spectral densities, magnetic
moments, charge transfer, - Potentials
- Tunneling calculations
- Relativistic spin-polarized layer-KKR
- Landauer-Büttiker approach
- MacLaren-Butler algorithm
- Sophisticated Brillouin-zone sampling (adaptive
mesh refinement)
11Spin valve Co/Cu/Co
TMR vs spacer thickness
- fcc-Co(001)/Cu/fcc-Co(001)
- Conducting spacer
- G(P) gt G(AP)
- Sizable TMR
- Almost independent on the spacer thickness
- Oscillations quantum-well states in the Cu spacer
Conductance vs spacer thickness
12Hot spots Ni/Vac/Ni
- Ni(001)/vacuum/Ni(001)
- Insulating spacer Focusing of the transmission
- Effective energy
Exponential decay
13Hot spots Ni/Vac/Ni II
Hot spots in the transmission Interface
resonances
Academic feature suppressed by disorder,
choice of the lead materials,
14Bias-voltage dependence Co/Vac/Co
- Typical finding for oxide barriers decrease of
the TMR with bias voltage - Origin defect scattering, magnons, ?
- Idea Replace the oxide by vacuum -gt no defects
- Replace the planar tunnel junction by a STM
set-up - Is the TMR still decreasing?
15Bias-voltage dependence Co/Vac/Co II
Co(0001)/vacuum/Co-STM tip Experimental results
with a magnetic STM
Small tip-sample distance (5 Å)
Large tip-sample distance (7 Å)
TMR constant
Dip at 0.2 eV
16Bias-voltage dependence Co/Vac/Co III
- Theory for a Co(0001)/vacuum/Co(0001) planar
junction
- Problem bias voltage
- Simple solution
- Change the inner potentials of the leads (bias)
- Adapt a smooth interface barrier from LEED
- Barrier height automatically adjusted
17Bias-voltage dependence Co/Vac/Co IV
Spin-resolved bulk bands
Surface state
TMR constant
Spin-resolved spectral density of Co(0001)
Conductance vs bias voltage
Dip? Not found in theory but possibly related to
the majority surface state. Tip-induced feature?
18Interface structure Fe/MgO/Fe
- Fe(001)/MgO/Fe(001)
- Bulk electronic structure
MgO
Band gap too small (DFT) 4.24 eV vs 7.6 eV
(Expt.)
Fe
Majority
Minority
19Interface structure Fe/MgO/Fe II
Bulk Fe bcc
Bulk MgO fcc, NaCl
20Interface structure Fe/MgO/Fe III
- Interface geometry
- Standard model ideal cut paste structure
- New Formation of an FeO layer
FeO layer
X-ray diffraction Holger Meyerheim et al, PRL 87
(2001) 076102 Confirmed by total-energy
calculations (Arthur Ernst)
Empty spheres
Effect of the interface structure on the TMR?
21Interface structureFe/MgO/Fe IV
- Magnetic profiles
- 2 MgO layers
- Strongly dependent on calculational details on
the interface structure
Layer-resolved magnetic moments
Standard model
FeO layer
22Interface structure Fe/MgO/Fe V
- Transmission for AP alignment 4 MgO layers
Standard model
FeO layer
Fe/(MgO)4/Fe
Fe/FeO/(MgO)4/FeO/Fe
Additional scattering at the FeO layer change of
the transmission
23Interface structure Fe/MgO/Fe VI
Preasymptotic regime Increasing TMR
Exponential decay
Bulk potentials only
Standard model
FeO layer
Preliminary results work in progress
24Outlook work in progress
- Fe/MgO/Fe
- Inclusion of electron correlation (oxide layer)
via self-interaction correction - Co/Au/Vac/Co
- Effect of quantum-well states in the Au film
- Further projects
- Magnetic STM
- Bias voltage, tip shape, full potential, spin
motion,
Drivers, supporters, observers,
Jamal Berakdar, Mohammed Bouhassoune, Patrick
Bruno, Markus Däne, Hai Feng Ding, Arthur Ernst,
Wolfram Hergert, Piotr Karas, Jürgen Kirschner,
Martin Lüders, Udo Schmidt, Dzidka Szotek, Walter
Temmerman, Wulf Wulfhekel,