Update of f1020 e16 Analysis - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 20
About This Presentation
Title:

Update of f1020 e16 Analysis

Description:

K- MM Cut. Kaons after. fiducial cuts. MMepK vs IMkk. CLAS ... Nf=792 94. CLAS Collaboration Meeting June 2006. Differential Cross Section in t' t'= 0.2 GeV2 ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:18
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 21
Provided by: jlab5
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Update of f1020 e16 Analysis


1
Update of f(1020) e1-6 Analysis
  • Joe Santoro
  • CLAS Collaboration Meeting
  • June 20, 2006

2
f electroproduction
3
f electroproduction
ep?epf?epK(K-)
e1a/e1b E 4.2 GeV, Q2 0.7 - 2.2 GeV2
e1-6a E 5.75 GeV Q2 1.7 - 3.8 GeV2
Q2 (GeV2)
Q2 (GeV2)

W (GeV)
W (GeV)
4
e1-6 Experiment _at_ CLAS
  • 5.75 GeV Beam
  • 21 mC of Accumulated Charge on
  • a Proton Target
  • ep ?epf?K(K-)

Drift Chambers
TOF
Cherenkov
Electromagnetic Calorimeter
5
Electron Selection
Z-Vertex
E/p vs P EC energy
Electron Fiducial cuts
Number of photoelectrons
6
Hadron Selection
K- MM Cut
Kaons before fiducial cuts
Kaons after fiducial cuts
MMepK vs IMkk
7
6-D Acceptance Correction
8
6-D Acceptance Correction
9
Radiative Corrections
EXCLURAD was used to obtain corrections in
Q2,W,F, and COS(q)CM bins
10
f yields
  • Collected 4x
  • number of fs as
  • previous CLAS
  • measurement and
  • in a higher Q2 range

Nf792 94
IMKK (GeV)
11
Differential Cross Section in t
t 0.2 GeV2
t 0.6 GeV2
t 1.0 GeV2
t 1.4 GeV2
t 1.8 GeV2
t 2.2 GeV2
t 3.2 GeV2
t 2.6 GeV2
K K- Invariant Mass (GeV)
12
VMD Model Comparison
VMD predicts
Lukashin, et. al.
13
Total Cross Sections s(Q2)
Q2 1.7 GeV2
Q2 1.9 GeV2
Q2 2.4 GeV2
Q2 2.1 GeV2
f yields in six Q2 bins
Q2 2.8 GeV2
Q2 3.4 GeV2
K K- Invariant Mass (GeV)
14
JML Model Comparison
Reggon (Pomeron) 2-gluon Exchange Model
ltWgt2.4 GeV
15
Comparison to World Data
16
Differential Cross Section in F
SCHC Conserved
17
Fits and extraction of
18
GPD Discussion
  • GPDs predict as

R
Q2 (GeV2)
19
Summary
  • Kinematic Ranges 1.6 Q2 3.8, 0.0 t -3.6,
  • 2.0 W 3.0
  • Total f yields 4x statistics of previous CLAS
    result
  • Differential cross section in t VMD bf
    measured decreasing
  • Total cross sections in Q2 Comparison to JML
    model
  • Angular Distributions measured
  • GPD-related results measured ltRgt which shows
    expected
  • trend, but no model calculation for comparison

20
To Do
CLAS analysis note is under review
  • Quantify systematic errors
  • Write paper ?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com