Title: Case Study Calcasieu Refining
1EPA/STATE and LOCAL 12th ANNUAL AIR INSPECTOR
WORKSHOPApril 16, 2009Dallas, Texas
- Case Study Calcasieu Refining
- Tank 312
- by Debbie Ford, EPA-R6
2Once upon a time.
- there was a small refinery in southwest Louisiana
named Calcasieu Refining. - Its capacity was 15,000 barrels of oil per day
(bpd).
3It began to grow and expand..
- Soon it was operating with a capacity of 80,000
bpd
4Then there was the HAWK Project
5EPA Grant to study emissions from barges along
Louisiana waterways
- Used a helicopter with a GasFindIR camera mounted
externally - A series of studies over 1 ½ years along the
Mississippi River, the Intracoastal Waterway, and
the Calcasieu Ship Channel (SWLA) - Ground (actually water) support crews of LDEQ and
Coast Guard to measure and confirm leaks found
6On Wednesday, July 11, 2007, the HAWK spotted
Calcasieu Refinery situated on the Calcasieu Ship
Channel.. and noticed something
Tank 311.wmv
Tank 312.wmv
7Youve got mail
- Calcasieu Refining
- Tank 311 and tank just east of Tank 313.
- Both leaking vapors.
- Bruce
8Tanks are identified
- Facilities throughout LA had been forewarned
about the HAWK Project for Homeland Security
purposes - The Operations Manager at Calcasieu Refining was
contacted and he reported that the facility had 3
crude tanks - TK-300 EFR 100,000 bbl (NSPS Subpart Ka)
- TK-311 EFR 200,000 bbl (NSPS Subpart Ka)
- TK-312 IFR 100,000 bbl (NSPS Subpart Kb)
9Facility Plot Plan
10DEQ Investigation
- At this point, LDEQ inspectors did not know
where the leaks were occurring only that vapors
had been observed - Tank inspection records were requested
- Tank 311 (EFR) records revealed no obvious
compliance issues. Last primary secondary seal
gap measurement performed 4 months prior. No
obvious compliance issues. - Tank 312 (IFR) records were more complicated.
11Tank 312 (IFR) History
- Originally built as an IFR tank in 1980 (NSPS
Subpart Ka) - 134 diameter, 40 height
- Floating roof aluminum pontoon deck with 10
pontoons - Single, vapor-mounted seal
- Originally permitted for kerosene/diesel service
122004 Permit Modification
- References to change to crude service
- EIQ sheet for Tank 312 indicated Crude Oil Tank
and change in emissions - No reference to change in permit briefing sheet
or in Applicability Table - Tanks 4.0.9 Emission Report in application
indicated it was a Crude Oil Tank with IFR and a
single vapor-mounted seal (no change from prior
service) - Reid Vapor Pressure 5 in Tanks Emission Report
(typical for crude) - Raised a compliance question Did Calcasieu
Refining just switch the service from diesel to
crude without any modification to the tank? - Crude has a vapor pressure gt 1.5 psia. NSPS Kb
requires either a liquid mounted seal, a
mechanical shoe seal, or a double seal (primary
and secondary).
13Tank 312 (IFR) history (contd)
- LDEQ inspection June 2005 - tank still in diesel
service - Internal inspection records October 2005
indicated that the tank was storing diesel but
was changing to crude service - Permit modifications approved in 2007 indicated
NSPS Subpart Kb applicability
14Other issues
- The company found some e-mails regarding work
done on Tank 312. They began pulling the
financial records and contracts to determine the
scope of work. - Conclusion facility had installed a double-seal
system in Feb. 2006. - Records indicated that crude was introduced to
the tank in late Feb. 2006. No notification to
LDEQ to observe inspection prior to tank refill.
15Facility visit 7/17/06 (Tues)
- Met with the new Environmental Manager
- While at the facility, we received the video of
the helicopter flyover with the visible emissions
from the crude tanks. This was the first time we
knew the exact location of the reported
emissions. - Reviewed the crude assays from barge deliveries
from 7/3/07 7/15/07 RVP was 7.6, 5.6, 5.0, 4.8,
and 7.9. - RVP records for Tank 312 since put into service
revealed a max RVP of 11 and an average RVP of
7.98. - Environmental technician had monitored the tanks
on 7/12/07 (the date the emissions were observed)
using a TVA-1000. - 8 of 16 roof vents on Crude Tank 300 (EFR) gt
10,000 ppm. Maximum concentration was 161,400
ppm. - 9 of 23 roof vents on Crude Tank 311 (EFR) gt
10,000 ppm. Maximum concentration was 147,800 ppm
(this was the leaking vacuum breaker observed on
the video). - These roof vents described by the Env.
Technician were later found to be the roof legs
and vacuum breakers. -
16Visual inspection of roof
- Company had not performed an annual
through-the-hatch visual inspection in Feb. 2007.
- Due to the visual observation of emissions by the
GasFindIR and a concentration of 4000 ppm with
the TVA-1000, we arranged for the facility to
perform a visual inspection. - Company said the level would be kept at a low
level. - 2 days later at the inspection, it was full. Only
saw about 5-6 feet of the seal. It was a gray,
closed-cell extruded foam material.
17Seal Material
- Softlite Ionomer Periphery Wedge Seal made of
Dupont Surlyn by Gilman Corp. - Life expectancy of 5-8 years.
- Technical info from Dupont
- Highly resistant to permeation by liquids.
However, some aromatic, cyclic, and higher
aromatic hydrocarbon solvents do cause swelling
permeate through the ionomer should be used
with caution. - Aromatics are plasticizers causing swelling,
weight gain, softening, and some loss of
strength. - Ethylbenzene Toluene were listed as not
resistant and were not recommended for service
under any conditions.
18Double seal installation details
- Upgrade of tank undertaken by prior Plant Manager
and prior Environmental Manager - Company bought the materials (seal, framework)
from different suppliers and contracted with a
third company to install. - The additional weight of a mechanical shoe seal
would have likely required replacement of the 10
pontoons with 12 inch pontoons, thus much higher
cost.
19Seal Material
- Softlite Ionomer Periphery Wedge Seal made of
Dupont Surlyn by Gilman Corp.
20Seal Material (contd)
- Life expectancy of 5-8 years.
- Technical info from Dupont
- Highly resistant to permeation by liquids.
However, some aromatic, cyclic, and higher
aromatic hydrocarbon solvents do cause swelling
permeate through the ionomer should be used
with caution. - Aromatics are plasticizers causing swelling,
weight gain, softening, and some loss of
strength. - Ethylbenzene Toluene were listed as not
resistant and were not recommended for service
under any conditions.
21Other issue
- Company was nearing conclusion of negotiations
for Refinery Consent Decree. - Wanted to exclude any compliance issues prior to
July 31, 2007 (thus the issues with Tank 312). - LDEQ denied request the company agreed to empty
degas the tank by Feb. 2011. A mechanical shoe
seal will be installed. - Until then, a semi-annual through-the-hatch
visual inspection with LDEQ observation will be
implemented.
22Use of Dupont Surlyn seals (aka Softlite Seals
by Gilman Corp)
- If you find a tank with this material, send me
(ford.debbie_at_epa.gov) information about the tank - Facility name/location
- Tank ID
- Tank size
- turnovers/year
- Material stored
- Date of seal installation
- Any info on issues with emissions/odors
23Resources
- If it doesnt look right, ask questions.
- There are always new things to learn.
- Use all of the tools of your agency
- Check your agencys library for reference
materials -
24Questions?