Title: Measurements of Inclusive Diffraction at HERA
1 Measurements of Inclusive
Diffraction at HERA
- M.Kapishin, JINR, Dubna
- Diffractive DIS at HERA
- Factorization in diffractive DIS
- Diffractive cross section measurements
- Charged current measurements
- Summary
M.Kapishin, Inclusive diffraction at HERA
1
2 H1 and ZEUS experiments
HERA collider p (920 GeV) x e (27.6 GeV), vs
320 GeV
M.Kapishin, Inclusive diffraction at HERA
2
3 Diffractive DIS at HERA
HERA 10 of low-x DIS events are diffractive
? study QCD structure of high energy diffraction
with virtual photon
Standard DIS
Diffractive DIS
e
e
?
x
- Probe structure of color singlet exchange ? F2D
- Probe structure of proton ? F2
M.Kapishin, Inclusive diffraction at HERA
3
4 Diffractive DIS at HERA
Large rapidity gap between leading proton p and X
?max
W
- Momentum fraction of proton carried by color
singlet exchange - Momentum fraction of color singlet carried by
struck quark
M.Kapishin, Inclusive diffraction at HERA
4
5 Diffractive Reduced Cross Section
Relation to F2D and FLD
t
- Integrate over t while proton is not measured ?
M.Kapishin, Inclusive diffraction at HERA
5
6 Factorization in Diffractive DIS
QCD hard scattering factorization
- universal hard scattering cross section (same as
in inclusive DIS) - diffractive parton distribution function ? obey
DGLAP, - universal for diffractive ep DIS (inclusive,
di-jets, charm) - Additional assumption ? Regge factorization
- pomeron flux factor - pomeron parton
distribution function
M.Kapishin, Inclusive diffraction at HERA
6
7 Selection of diffraction Mx method
- Properties of Mx distribution
- exponential rise with Mx
- for non-diffractive events
- flat vs ln Mx2 for diffractive events
Forward Plug Calorimeter (FPC) ?acceptance
extended to higher Mx and lower W range
?p-dissociation MY lt 2.3 GeV
- non-diffractive events subtracted
- from fit
- contamination from reaction
- ep?eXY
M.Kapishin, Inclusive diffraction at HERA
7
8 W dependence of dsdiff/dMx
(Mx method)
- 2.2 lt Q2 lt 80 GeV2
- p-dissociation contribution MYlt2.3 GeV
- Mx lt 2 GeV weak W dependence
- Mx gt 2 GeV ds/dMx rises with W
- power-like fit ? extract aIPdiff
M.Kapishin, Inclusive diffraction at HERA
8
9 Effective aIP(0) vs Q2
Diffractive cross section
Inclusive cross section according to optical
theorem
- Effective aIP(0)
- lower than for inclusive cross section
- consistent with soft IP at low Q2
- data suggest increase with Q2
- Regge factorization breaking
- similar W dependence of diffractive and
inclusive cross section - 2(aIPdiff -1) aIPtot - 1
n
M.Kapishin, Inclusive diffraction at HERA
9
10 LPS proton vs Rapidity Gap
- Large rapidity gap selection
- MYlt1.6 GeV and tlt1 GeV2
- LPS proton selection MY mp
- extrapolated to tlt1 GeV2
- ?Good agreement between two methods and two
experiments - ?Data well described by
- H1 QCD fit to LRG data
-
- ZEUS Mx data should be scaled by 0.69
to account for p-diss - ?see also Heuijin Lim talk for ZEUS LPS results
M.Kapishin, Inclusive diffraction at HERA
10
11srD measurements
- Data at Low Q2, L 3.4 pb-1
- Good agreement between measurements
- Data well described by H1 NLO QCD Fit to medium
Q2 data ? diffractive PDFs - IR contribution needed at high xIP
- Data at Medium Q2, L 10.6 pb-1
- Data at High Q2, L 65 pb-1
M.Kapishin, Inclusive diffraction at HERA
11
12 NLO DGLAP Fit ? PDF
Zq
PDF
- ? Diffractive PDFs
- PDF extend to large fractional momentum z
- Precise measurement of quark singlet distribution
- Gluon distribution dominated
- ? 75 15
- Large gluon uncertainty at high z
- Can be applied to test QCD factorization in ep
final states (charm, di-jets) ? see next talk
?see also Heuijin Lim talk for ZEUS QCD Fit
M.Kapishin, Inclusive diffraction at HERA
12
13 Measurement at High Q2 vs Prediction of
QCD Fit
- Improved statistics and kinematical range of new
measurement compared to previous measurement - ? good agreement
- Prediction of NLO Fit based on Medium Q2
data - ? good agreement
- Sub-leading trajectory needed at high xIP
and low ß
M.Kapishin, Inclusive diffraction at HERA
13
14 Q2 dependence
- Evolution of NLO Fit over an order of magnitude
in Q2 - good agreement with High Q2 data
- scaling violations in a wide ß range
- High Q2 data will provide additional constraints
on singlet and gluon distributions
M.Kapishin, Inclusive diffraction at HERA
14
15 High Q2 charged current events
Probe LRG processes via weak interactions ep ?
?Wp ? ?XY
PDF
- H1 L 63 pb-1
- Large rapidity gap selection
- xIPlt0.05, MY lt 1.6 GeV
- Q2 gt 200 GeV2, y lt 0.9
- ? 14 CC events
- ZEUS L 60.9 pb-1
- Large rapidity gap selection xIPlt0.05
- Q2 gt 200 GeV2, y lt 0.9 ? 9 CC events
M.Kapishin, Inclusive diffraction at HERA
15
16 High Q2 charged current events
Incl
LRG
- Probe diffractive PDFs from H1 94 QCD Fit
assuming flavor symmetry ? RAPGAP - RAPGAP ARIADNE give reasonable description of
LRG and inclusive CC data
n
M.Kapishin, Inclusive diffraction at HERA
16
17 Differential CC cross sections
- First measurement of differential LRG CC cross
sections - RAPGAP with diffractive PDFs from H1 2002 LO QCD
Fit describes LRG CC cross sections - ?contribution of sub-leading trajectory at
high xIP
n
M.Kapishin, Inclusive diffraction at HERA
17
18 High Q2 CC cross section
- LRG CC cross section (Q2gt200GeV2,xIPlt0.05,ylt0.9)
- ZEUS sCC LRG 0.49 0.20(stat)0.13(syst) pb
- H1 sCC LRG 0.42 0.13(stat)0.09(syst) pb
- Ratio of LRG to inclusive CC cross section
(xBjlt0.05) - ZEUS sCC LRG / sCC Incl 2.9 1.2(stat)0.8(syst)
- H1 sCC LRG / sCC Incl 2.5
0.8(stat)0.6(syst) - ? Results are in good agreement
n
M.Kapishin, Inclusive diffraction at HERA
18
19 Summary
- ZEUS recent measurement of diffractive data with
improved precision and extended kinematic range - indication that aIP increases with Q2
- similar W dependence of diffractive and inclusive
DIS - H1 measurement of diffractive cross section at
high Q2 - data are consistent with NLO DGLAP Fit to medium
Q2 data including additional contribution from
sub-leading trajectory - ZEUS and H1 first measurement of LRG CC cross
section at high Q2 - probe LRG processes via weak interactions
- data are consistent with model based on
diffractive PDFs - results of two experiments are in good agreement
-
M.Kapishin, Inclusive diffraction at HERA
19