Title: Strategies for Promoting Language and Literacy in Diverse Populations
1Strategies for Promoting Language and Literacy in
Diverse Populations
- Presented by
- Jean C. Brown, M. Jeanne Wilcox, Dawn
Cosgrove-Greer, Shereen Thomas, Miriam Garlant
2Sycamore Daycare and Preschool
- A low income community early care and
education program.
3Philosophy A place dedicated to children, where
they can learn and grow in safe, comfortable,
nurturing surroundings
At the Sycamore School, the emphasis is on
education, responsibility, respect for each other
and lots of good old fashioned fun.
4Population
5 Administrators 9 Lead Teachers 7
Assistant Teachers 2 Other (Van Drivers)
Ethnicity 11 Caucasian, 12 Hispanic Age Range
Under 20 to 60 years
85 DES, (State funded, Dept of Economic
Security) 15 Private Pay Ethnicity Approx. 36
Caucasian, 34 Hispanic, 18 African American, 9
American Indian,
5Challenges at Sycamore
- Teacher turn over
- Teacher experience/interest
- Teacher lack of education
- Child turnover
- Facility limitations
- Referee Mentality
- Curriculum
6Teachers
- Turn over
- New teacher in the first two weeks
- Target teacher left after 7 months
- Next teacher stayed 3 weeks
- Experience/interest
- Not a profession,a paycheck
- Minimal experience, target b/c took a college
course - Lead teachers had a minimum high school degree or
GED. Admin. Masters degree
7Child Turnover
- New children daily for a variety of reasons
- Too many in a class
- No teacher
- Admin moved children due to age
- Children moved due to behavior
- Child left the area or lost funding
8Curriculum
- Facility had curriculum specialist
- Room full of options of Xerox papers accumulated
by specialist - No set or formal curriculum
- Minimal guidance
- Intermittent accountability
9Facility Limitations
- Proprietary family owned business
- Lack of funding
- Large numbers of employees (relatives)
- Lack of materials/toys/supplies
10Sycamore Strengths
- Caring Administrator
- Diverse Population
- Willingness to make changes
- Safe Environment
11Purchases with Stipend
- Stipend was larger due to need
- Teacher chose items
- Items ordered were essentials
- Items made a big difference in classroom function
and management
12Implementation
- Weekly site visits
- Monthly meetings with CAT forms
- Re-cap discussion of what teacher was already
doing, suggestions within the classroom
occurrences to expand ideas - Enhancement materials for curriculum
- Classroom modeling of goals.
- Purchasing of classroom essentials.
13(No Transcript)
14What worked at Sycamore
- Friendly non-authoritarian approach
- Review of what was going well
- Language enhancement sheets
- Classroom modeling
- Goals devised in partnership
15Sycamore
16SycamoreEnvironment Print Awareness
17Impressions following the one year study
- Teacher was more self-assured
- Teacher had circle time activities
- Less referee style
- Teacher played with children more
- Children had items to play and learn from
- Children had more cooperative play chances
- Many more literacy activities within the
classroom environ.
18Recommendations
- Continue but require all preschool teachers at
the site to attend the monthly meeting - Use video tape of participant as training tool
- Encourage investment of published curriculum
- Facilitate carry over as originally planned, a
second person to participate who is less
transient.
19SOUTH MOUNTAIN FAMILY YMCA Early Childhood
Development Center
20SITE DESCRIPTION
- State-licensed child care facility
- 630 am - 6 pm M-F
- Ages 18 months - 5 years 50 funded through
Department of Economic Security
21SITE DESCRIPTION
- 4 day care 2 Head Start classrooms
- On-site director
- Office administrator/receptionist
- Six Lead Teachers, six teaching assistants
- Janitorial staff
- Currently preparing for NAEYC accreditation
22STAFF DEMOGRAPHICS
- 13 women, one man
- Age range 25-60 years
- Ethnic breakdown
- 1 Caucasian
- 3 African American
- 10 Hispanic
- Director graduate degree
- 2 Lead Teachers - Associates Degrees
- All other staff - high school diplomas
23PHILOSOPHY
- Four character development values
- Caring
- Respect
- Honesty
- Responsibility
- Creative Curriculum
24PROJECT SET-UP
- Biweekly team meeting
- to discuss projects language and literacy goals
- to brainstorm lesson plans for the month
- Biweekly classroom observation
- ASU coach used the CAT to provide teachers with
feedback
25Environmental Changes - Literacy
26Changes in Program Goals
27FIRST IMPRESSIONS TEACHER-CHILD INTERACTIONS
- Very open, casual, comfortable relationship
between teachers and children - Nurturing and respectful
- Emphasis on traditional values
- Many adult-child conversations
- Sharing of personal anecdotes and stories with
children
28FINAL IMPRESSIONS TEACHER-CHILD INTERACTIONS
- more open-ended problem solving
- more modeling of appropriate behavior and
structured role-plays - continued rich conversations with the children
increase focus on pre-academic concepts, using
definitions and examples, direct teaching of
vocabulary, etc.
29Changes in Program Goals
30SUCCESSES
- Interim directors interest was a boost to the
team - Regular team meetings were beneficial
- Positive response to CAT observations
- Lead teacher was very responsive
- Immediate growth in environmental changes was
motivating - These children were a cohesive, independent group
with good language skills.
31CHALLENGES
- Change of director midyear
- Limitations placed on teachers due to Y policies
and budgets - Lack of communication between teachers and
administration - Problems with scheduling
- Child enrollment fluctuated throughout the year
- Changes in teaching style may take more than one
year
32RECOMMENDATIONS
- Obtain support of site director
- Build rapport with teaching team
- Be flexible but consistent with scheduling
- Follow teachers lead for focus areas easier to
start with environmental changes - Emphasize the positive in using the CAT
- Plan for a minimum of 2 years
- Train a master teacher to transfer knowledge
33Strategies for Promoting Language and Literacy
- Native American Populations
- Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community
- Scottsdale, Arizona
-
-
34Tribe Composition
- The Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community is
comprised of two Native American tribes - Pima river people
- Maricopa people who live toward the water
- Their relationship was formed in the 1800s to
protect themselves against the Yuman and Apache
tribes - Pima believe that they are descendents of the
Hohokam (those who have gone, 300 BC)
35Salt River Pima-Maricopa Community
- Created on June 14, 1879 by President Rutherford
B. Hayes. - Located in Maricopa County, AZ bounded by
- Mesa
- Tempe
- Scottsdale
- Fountain Hills
- Metropolitan Phoenix
- Â Governed by
- President
- Vice President
- Seven Council Members
36Salt River Pima-Maricopa Community
- The Community consists of
- 53,600 acres
- 19,000 acres as a natural preserve
- Approximately 12,000 acres are under cultivation
in a variety of crops including - Cotton, melons, potatoes, onions, broccoli and
carrots. - Commercial development is reserved along the
Community's western boundary.
37The Man In the Maze
- The legend of the "Man in the Maze" helps
children understand the meaning of life. The maze
depicts experiences and choices we make in our
journey through life. It illustrates the search
for balance - physical, social, mental and
spiritual. In the middle of the maze are found a
person's dreams and goals. Legend says when we
reach the center, the Sun God is there to greet
us, bless us and pass us into the next world.
38Mission Statement of Early Childcare Center
- Our mission is to provide an educational
environment that will undergo continuous
refinement and reflection to support the success
of the individual life-long learner. This
success will be achieved by developing
partnerships, setting high standards, and
emphasizing responsibility and accountability at
all levels.
39Program Goals
- To create a regular system and method of two-way
communication - To promote responsibility and accountability at
all levels - To provide opportunities for everyone to succeed
- To create a healthy Community through the
elimination of social ills - To create successful partnership models to
promote a healthy community - To create a system that will develop, nurture,
and promote the Oodham and Piipaash languages
and cultural values - Â
40Program Description
- Site Urban Native American Reservation
- Curriculum High Reach
- Enrollment 3-5years old
- Hours 7a.m. to 6p.m.
- Language English
- Funding Source
- Tribal funding
- Block grant
- Tuition
41SRPMIC Early Childhood Education Center Staff
Demographics
Ethnicity
- Age
- 17 22- 39 Yrs
- 37 30-39 Yrs
- 37 40-49 Yrs
- 3 50- 59 Yrs
- 2 60 Yrs
- 37 SRPMIC
- 17 Navajo
- 12 Anglo
- 7 Pasua-Yaqi
- 7 Hispanic
- 5 Hopi
- 2 Cheyenne
- 2 Crow
- 2 Filipino
- 2 Dutch
- 2 Japanese
- 2 Mixed
- (Of these, 73 are American Indian)
- Child Care
- 63 Child Care
- 54 Head Start
- Of these 17 (7) had both
- Position
- 41 Lead Teacher
- 24 Administration
- 17 Assistant Teacher
- 12 Teachers Aid
- 5 (2) Therapist
- Education
- 56 High School Diploma
- 15 Associates Degree
- 15 Bachelors Degree
- 11 GED
- 5 Graduate
42Ethnic Background of Children
- N 15
- 53 Pima
- 27 Biracial
- 13 Hispanic
- 7 Navajo
43The Bear Dens Teacher
- Caucasian female
- 42 years old preschool 3- year-olds
- Child care teacher
- 10 years of experience
- 3 months in current position
- 8 months in Head Start
- Bachelors degree in psychology
- Working on CDA
44What We Worked On
- Environmental arrangement
- Improving interactional style with the children
- Fostering peer interaction
- Normal speech and language development
- Use of sound and symbols
- Embedding sounds into center activities
- Â
45The Bear Dens Teacher Aide
- 25 years old
- 2 months in current position
- She reluctantly agreed to participate in November
- High school graduate
- Very creative
- Ran errands
- She enjoyed music and songs
46What We Worked On
- Becoming a co-teacher
- Following the childrens lead
- Book reading
- Leading circle time
47The Eagle Nests Teacher
- Navajo female
- 27 years old
- Child care teacher preschool 4-5
- 6 years experience
- 5 years at SRPMIC
- High school diploma
- CDA
- Workshops and trainings
- Joined the project in December
- Excellent teacher
48What We Worked On
- Room arrangement
- Peer interaction
- Sound and symbol
- Incorporating sounds into the center
- Interpersonal relationships/communication
49SRPMIC
50Challenges
- Securing the support of key stakeholders
- Embracing the mission and goal of the school
- Responding positively to the mission through
accountability and individual work ethic - Involving the home in the school process
51Challenges
- Stereotypes About Native Americans
- Low print environments
- Poverty
- Cognitive deficiencies
- (Wong Fillmore, 2001)
52Successes
53Successes
- Book Reading
- Oral Language
- Pre-test
- Post-test
54What it Means to be Literate
- Functional Literacy
- Speaking
- Reading
- Writing
- Comprehending
- Cultural Literacy
- Knowledge of literature
- History and traditions
- Scientific and technological accomplishments of
the dominant culture and ones own
ethnic/cultural heritage
- Critical Literacy
- To think analytically and creatively which uses
the highest level of cognitive development - Garcia Goldstein Ahler (1992)
55Recommendations
- School Non-school literacy gap
- Mixed messages
- Ascertaining community priorities
- Lack of written language
- Decontextualization of language and storytelling
- Learning styles
- Jody Marinucci 2001
56Closing Thought
- We risk failure by ignoring the significance of
human connectedness in many communities of color
(Delpit, 1995, p.95).
57References
- Delpit, Lisa. (1995). Other peoples children
Cultural conflict in the classroom. New York New
Press. - Garcia, Ricardo L. Goldstein Ahler, Janet.
(1992). Indian education Assumptions,
ideologies, strategies. In J. Rehyner (Ed.)
Teaching American Indian Students (pp.13-32).
University of Oklahoma Press Norman. - Marinucci, Jody (2001). Literacy in native
american education httpsi.unm.eduweb/20Journals/a
rticles 2001/jmarinucci_jrn.htm - Wong Fillmore, Lily (2001). Issues of language
differences and literacy development What do
language minority students need? Paper presented
at the UNM ESL Institute, Albuquerque, NM.
58- Phoenix Day Early Childhood Center
59PROGRAM DESCRIPTION
- Philosophy
- -Children learn best when they are stimulated
through experiences and not taught experiences. - -Through planned and spontaneous activities and
experiences the center provides unlimited
opportunities for the development of the whole
child. - -Dedicated to serving working poor families.
60PROGRAM DESCRIPTION
- History
- -Founded in 1915, Phoenix Day is the oldest
child development center in the state of Arizona.
- - National Association for the Education of
Young Children (NAEYC) accreditation since 1996.
61PROGRAM DESCRIPTION
- State-licensed child care facility offering
toddler and preschool programs - 630 am - 6 pm M-F
- ages 6 weeks - 5 years.
- One infant room
- Two toddler rooms
- Four preschool classrooms
- 166 children enrolled
- NAEYC accreditation
62FUNDING SOURCES
- United Way, corporate and community donations,
grants and DES subsides - Private, not for profit program
- Nearly 80 of children qualify for DES childcare
fee reimbursement - A few parents pay their own tuition
63SITE DEMOGRAPHICS
- 26 females, one male
- Ethnic breakdown
- 1 Caucasian
- 26 Hispanic
- Languages
- 18 Spanish-English Bilingual
- 9 English monolingual
- 83 of families at or below the federal poverty
level - Average annual household income of family of
four, 17,922 - 90 of parents are employed
- 100 of families are subsidized by Phoenix Day
- 74 Hispanic origin 15 Caucasian 7 African
American 2 Native American 1 Asian and 1
multi-racial/ethnic.
64PARTICIPANTS
- Preschool Class A
- 20 students enrolled
- 40 maximum capacity
- one lead teacher, 3 other teachers/aides
- Preschool Class B
- 22 students enrolled
- 40 maximum capacity
- one lead teacher, 3 other teachers/aides
65STRENGTHS
- Daycare experience and Training
- All had CDA certificate
- 8 years experience or more at same site
- Low turn-over
- All Spanish-English bilingual
- Four adults in each class
- Strong lead teachers
- Resources facility
66CHALLENGES
- No curriculum, scope sequence
- Some aides not taking ownership
- Inconsistent pre-literacy and writing experiences
- Inconsistent child attendance enrollment
- Little teacher accountability for curriculum
fidelity
67PROJECT SET-UP
- Biweekly team meeting
- Meetings were used to discuss projects language
and literacy goals - Meeting also used to brainstorm lesson plans for
the month - Biweekly classroom observation
- ASU coach used the CAT to provide teachers with
feedback - Staff workshop on best practices in Feb., by
ICRP
68BASELINE OBSERVATIONS
- Play areas established
- Child artwork was displayed.
- Classrooms needed to develop literacy and print
rich environments. - Teachers needed development in language,
phonological, and print awareness facilitation.
69BASELINE OBSERVATIONS
- Teacher 1,
- - Did not include phonological awareness
- Curriculum loosely followed
- No letter of the week focus
70BASELINE OBSERVATIONS
- Teacher 2,
- Hesitant to lead lessons or circle time
- Responsive to children
- Language
- -inaudible at times
- -rapid rate of speech
71Final Observations
- Teachers expressed interested in continued
partnership - Increased oral language, pre-literacy, and
writing facilitation - 2 out 4 teachers were promoted the following year
72Phoenix Day
73Phoenix Day
74FINAL OBSERVATIONS
- Teacher 1
- Stronger inclusion of phonological awareness
throughout the daily routine - Oral language facilitation improved
75FINAL OBSERVATIONS
- Teacher 2,
- Stronger inclusion of phonological awareness
throughout the daily routine - Oral language facilitation improved
- Print awareness incorporated
76SUCCESSES
- Lead teachers were very responsive
- Regular meetings promoted
- team building
- creating lesson plans and brainstorming ideas
- appreciated having scheduled time for planning
- learned more about language and literacy
development
77What was learned
- Teachers demonstrated implementation of
strategies when provided with - - materials and tools
- - time to discuss lesson plans activities
- - target behaviors were modeled
- - time to discuss expectations for classroom
team members
78What was learned
- Learned to ask teachers how they wanted feedback
- - modeling
- - talking right after observation
- - talking later, when teacher isnt too busy
- Teachers needed help with team building, working
together
79NEXT STEPS
- Language and literacy enriched environment
initiated but not well developed - Continued training
- Use of curriculum, scope and sequence
- Teachers expressed the need for more training and
extended collaboration for the following year.
80RECOMMENDATIONS
- Allow time for team building- developing
partnerships takes time - Trainers- Avoid being intrusive
- Help teachers train other teachers
- Help in other areas, not just with language and
literacy goals
81The End