Comparison%20of%20Patient%20Profiles:%20Wavefront-Guided%20LASIK%20Versus%20Conventional%20LASIK - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Comparison%20of%20Patient%20Profiles:%20Wavefront-Guided%20LASIK%20Versus%20Conventional%20LASIK

Description:

Tx: VISX S4IR. 79 males and 120 females. Age range: 20 to 57 (33.6 8.4) ... was categorized by age, sex, occupation and pre-op refraction for comparative analysis. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:166
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 13
Provided by: judge2
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Comparison%20of%20Patient%20Profiles:%20Wavefront-Guided%20LASIK%20Versus%20Conventional%20LASIK


1
Comparison of Patient Profiles Wavefront-Guided
LASIK Versus Conventional LASIK
  • Michiho Suzuki-Judge, MD
  • Inouye Eye Hospital
  • Tokyo, Japan

2
Purpose
  • To document profiles of patients who selected
    either wavefront-guided LASIKor conventional
    LASIK.

3
Methods
  • Records of 396 LASIK procedures from 199 patients
    at Inouye Eye Hospital between 11/06 and 06/07
    were reviewed.
  • Tx VISX S4IR
  • 79 males and 120 females
  • Age range 20 to 57 (33.6?8.4)
  • Pre-op spherical equivalent range -0.88 to
    -12.88D (-5.38?2.02)

4
Methods
  • All patients were informed of pros, cons and
    price differences between the procedures and made
    their own decisions.

Wavefront-guided Conventional
Pros Less HOA Less night glare Less tissue ablation
Cons More tissue ablation More HOA More night glare
Price 300,000JPY for both eyes (3,000 USD) 200,000JPY for both eyes (2,000 USD)
5
Methods
  • Patient data was categorized by age, sex,
    occupation and pre-op refraction for comparative
    analysis.
  • X2, ANOVA and T-test analyses were applied to the
    data.

6
Results (Wavefront-guided / Conventional)
(male female ratio)
Conventional
WFG
7
Results (age)
Statistical differences found for all age groups
under 40
8
Results (occupation)
shown only for X2 values tested as
significantly different
9
Results (pre-op spherical equivalent)
(D)
10
Conclusions
  • At our hospital in Tokyo, wavefront-guided to
    conventional LASIK ratio was 63.6 to 36.4.
  • Average age and sex were not determinant factors
    in patients decisions for level of LASIK
    treatment.
  • Patients in their late 20s and 30s chose
    wavefront-guided LASIK more than conventional
    LASIK.

11
Conclusions
  • Patients in their early 20s chose conventional
    LASIK more often.
  • Housewives and students (dependants) chose
    conventional LASIK more often.
  • High myopia patients chose conventional LASIK
    because they were made aware of concerns for
    opportunities of enhancement if needed.

12
Thank you for your interest!
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com