Title: Comparison%20of%20Patient%20Profiles:%20Wavefront-Guided%20LASIK%20Versus%20Conventional%20LASIK
1Comparison of Patient Profiles Wavefront-Guided
LASIK Versus Conventional LASIK
- Michiho Suzuki-Judge, MD
- Inouye Eye Hospital
- Tokyo, Japan
2Purpose
- To document profiles of patients who selected
either wavefront-guided LASIKor conventional
LASIK.
3Methods
- Records of 396 LASIK procedures from 199 patients
at Inouye Eye Hospital between 11/06 and 06/07
were reviewed. - Tx VISX S4IR
- 79 males and 120 females
- Age range 20 to 57 (33.6?8.4)
- Pre-op spherical equivalent range -0.88 to
-12.88D (-5.38?2.02)
4Methods
- All patients were informed of pros, cons and
price differences between the procedures and made
their own decisions.
Wavefront-guided Conventional
Pros Less HOA Less night glare Less tissue ablation
Cons More tissue ablation More HOA More night glare
Price 300,000JPY for both eyes (3,000 USD) 200,000JPY for both eyes (2,000 USD)
5Methods
- Patient data was categorized by age, sex,
occupation and pre-op refraction for comparative
analysis. - X2, ANOVA and T-test analyses were applied to the
data.
6Results (Wavefront-guided / Conventional)
(male female ratio)
Conventional
WFG
7Results (age)
Statistical differences found for all age groups
under 40
8Results (occupation)
shown only for X2 values tested as
significantly different
9Results (pre-op spherical equivalent)
(D)
10Conclusions
- At our hospital in Tokyo, wavefront-guided to
conventional LASIK ratio was 63.6 to 36.4. - Average age and sex were not determinant factors
in patients decisions for level of LASIK
treatment. - Patients in their late 20s and 30s chose
wavefront-guided LASIK more than conventional
LASIK.
11Conclusions
- Patients in their early 20s chose conventional
LASIK more often. - Housewives and students (dependants) chose
conventional LASIK more often. - High myopia patients chose conventional LASIK
because they were made aware of concerns for
opportunities of enhancement if needed.
12Thank you for your interest!