Optimal Taxation Paper 7, Part IIb Dr Hamish Low - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 18
About This Presentation
Title:

Optimal Taxation Paper 7, Part IIb Dr Hamish Low

Description:

Minimise deadweight loss by minimising ... y=wh. c. Different Preferences between consumption and gross income. i. j ... Single-Crossing Property. y=wh. c. i. j ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:21
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 19
Provided by: drl2
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Optimal Taxation Paper 7, Part IIb Dr Hamish Low


1
Optimal TaxationPaper 7, Part IIbDr Hamish Low
Lecture 3
2
Summary
  • Minimise deadweight loss by minimising marginal
    tax rates (S.E.).
  • Maximise revenue by increasing average tax rate
    (I.E.)
  • Trade-off between individuals an increase in Cs
    marginal tax means an increase in Bs average tax

3
Outline Optimal Income Tax
  • Shape of tax schedule
  • Incentive compatibility
  • Choosing marginal tax rates
  • Criticisms

4
The Optimal Tax Problem
  • Choose tax schedule
  • to raise revenue required for government
    spending
  • to redistribute to those lower down
  • to minimise distortions to the economy
  • Observe income, not ability

Combining equity and efficiency considerations
5
Information for Optimal Tax
Individual Behaviour
Elasticities of substitution
Preferences over leisure and consumption
Social Welfare Function
? coefficient of inequality aversion
Distribution of Abilities
Pre-tax wages reflect ability
Restrictions on Functional Form
E.g. linear
6
Linear Tax Schedules
Work h hours for wage w and earn income y w h
Tax schedule 1
Tax schedule 2
7
Tax Schedules (cont)
Map from gross income to consumption
No Intervention
c
1
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
y
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
8
Revenue Neutrality
c
1
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
y
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
9
Marginal and Average Tax
10
Income tax schedules
No Intervention
c
B
y
11
Changing marginal tax, keeping average tax
unchanged
General Tax Schedule
Tax Paid
c
Benefit Received
y
12
Individual Behaviour
c
Common Preferences between consumption and labour
h
H
Take,
13
So, utility of person i can be written,
and we can find the slope of the indifference
curve between c and y.
Higher ability means higher wage
Assume Pre-tax wage reflects ability i.e.
For a given c and y, indifference curves are
flatter if greater ability
14
Common Preferences between consumption and
labour, with different abilities.
Different Preferences between consumption and
gross income
c
Slope of indifference curve is Flatter for
higher ability
j
Increasingly Preferable
i
ywh
Wage structure implies consumption increases with
ability if no taxation
15
Single-Crossing Property
c
j
i
ywh
Indifference curves of individual i will cross
the indifference curves of individual j once
16
Self-Selection
i
j
c
Incentive Compatibility
y
Tax Schedule It must be in the individuals
interests to choose the income-consumption pair
that the government intends. intended y and c
must increase with ability. If not better to
pretend to be low ability.
17
Imagine (intended) c fell with ability
i
j
j
c
y
person j would prefer to be like person i.
ß is not incentive compatible
18
Summary
  • Considering equity and efficiency simultaneously
  • Interdependencies between individuals affect
    optimal tax schedule
  • Can show tax as mapping from gross income to
    consumption
  • Preferences of individuals same between
    consumption and leisure, but differ for
    consumption vs gross income because of ability
  • Single crossing and incentive compatibility
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com