Spaghetti calorimeter - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Spaghetti calorimeter

Description:

readout segmentation, i.e. cell size: 3.75x3.75 cm2, 3.25x3.25 cm2, 2.5x2.5 cm2, 2.5x4.0 cm2 ... ZB (a.u.) ZB (a.u.) Summary. Some checks to be done on beam ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:22
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 8
Provided by: hepPh3
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Spaghetti calorimeter


1
Spaghetti calorimeter
A reminder of the calorimeter design from L.T.s
presentation at CERN on 29/03/03
Readout square (or rectangular) cells connected
to PMT photocatode by light guides shaped as
Winston cones
2
Muon vs electron identification
  • We have carried out simulation studies in G4MICE
    to optimize the m/e separation capabilities by
    varying
  • sampling fraction, i.e. lead layer thickness
    0.5-0.2 mm
  • readout segmentation, i.e. cell size
  • 3.75x3.75 cm2, 3.25x3.25 cm2, 2.5x2.5 cm2,
    2.5x4.0 cm2

3
Momentum
muons
electrons
at production
at calorimeter
at calorimeter (20 lost) (0.5 lt130 MeV/c)
Muons P(MeV/C)
Datacards used ltEkingt120.5 MeV , DE/E0.1
4
Lead absorber
Eff. for signalgtthreshold in 3rd or 4th layer
vsmomentum (useful mainly for trigger
purposes) For different absorber thickness and
readout cell sizes
Eff. In Layer 3
Eff. In Layer 4
Eff. In Layer 3
Efficiency on muons improves when less material
is traversed (thinner layers, smaller cells), but
electron contamination increases accordingly
5
A much lighter absorber pure polystirene
  • The option of a fully active detector
    (scintillator) has been suggested
  • We have considered the option with no absorber
    only polystirene fibers
  • Efficiencies are very optimistic !!!!
  • Readout with 3.75cm cells a huge number of PMTs

6
e/m separation algorithmsBaricenter coordinate
cells 3.75 cm
electrons
muons
ZB (a.u.)
ZB (a.u.)
cells 2.50 cm
ZB (a.u.)
ZB (a.u.)
7
Summary
  • Some checks to be done on beam distributions
    obtained with G4MICE
  • Optimization
  • 1) for fast signal (threshold cut)
  • Better efficiency on muons with thinner lead
    layers
  • No significant gain on low energy muons with
    fully active detectors, but much larger
    contamination from electrons
  • 2) e/m identification
  • Baricenter coordinate seems to be a very good
    separation criterium
  • Improving with thicker absorber and smaller
    redout cells, but to be checked as a function of
    muon momentum
  • Fully active detector provides very poor
    identification capabilities
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com