Assessing contributions to group assignments - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 14
About This Presentation
Title:

Assessing contributions to group assignments

Description:

... to group assignments. Jenny Graham, Karen Lawlan, Hayley Harvey, Sarah Hagan ... No difference between own contribution (mean of self rating and peer rating of ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:42
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 15
Provided by: Northumbri9
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Assessing contributions to group assignments


1
Assessing contributions to group assignments
  • Jenny Graham, Karen Lawlan, Hayley Harvey, Sarah
    Hagan

2
Introduction
  • Why use group work?
  • Unfair marking?
  • Peer marking

3
Aims
  • To investigate the use of peer assessment
  • Consider whether self assessment should be
    included in peer assessment

4
Method
  • Participants 61 undergraduate students
  • Group based assignment
  • Contribution questionnaires
  • Scoring

5
Results
6
Results
  • No difference between own contribution (mean of
    self rating and peer rating of self) and the mean
    group contribution.
  • No significant effects of sex
  • of students.

7
Conclusion
  • peer assessment has a positive impact on student
    group based assignments
  • enhanced learning experience
  • enhanced motivation
  • promotes reflective learning

8
Conclusion
  • The paper supports these views
  • The paper approves of using the method of peer
    assessment in the evaluation of group based work

9
Support for Peer/self assessment
  • Sense of ownership
  • Encouraging students to take responsibility
  • Mistakes are opportunities
  • Evaluation skills
  • Metacognition
  • Deeper learning
  • (Brown, Rust and Gibbs (1994), Zariski (1996)
    Race (1998)

10
  • Marking burden for staff is reduced
  • Teams or groups can achieve more
  • Students can perform a variety of assessment
    tasks in ways which both save the tutors time and
    bring educational benefits, especially the
    development of their own judgement skills (Rust,
    2001)

11
Arguments against peer/self assessment
  • Students comments
  • bad, unfair and biased
  • hate peer assessment
  • good but biased
  • against peer assessment, not qualified
  • poor, ulterior motives

(Dr D Wakelin Dr L Mcginnes, 2204)
12
  • Why do we need peer assessment?
  • (Dancer Kamvounias, 2005)
  • What happens when peer/self assessment differ?
  • (Krouse Popovich, 1996)

13
  • Satisfaction needed by tutors and learners that
    marks are valid, in order for peer assessment to
    be successful
  • ( Assessment evaluation in Higher Education
    Journal)

14
Summary
Be nice to peers as you never know when they will
have to evaluate you!!!
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com