SURFACE WAVE ELIMINATION BY INTERFEROMETRY AND ADAPTIVE SUBTRACTION - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 25
About This Presentation
Title:

SURFACE WAVE ELIMINATION BY INTERFEROMETRY AND ADAPTIVE SUBTRACTION

Description:

SURFACE WAVE ELIMINATION BY INTERFEROMETRY AND ADAPTIVE ... A seismogram with surface waves and reflections. 0. Problem: Surface waves blur the seismograms. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:31
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 26
Provided by: utamG
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: SURFACE WAVE ELIMINATION BY INTERFEROMETRY AND ADAPTIVE SUBTRACTION


1
SURFACE WAVE ELIMINATION BY INTERFEROMETRY AND
ADAPTIVE SUBTRACTION
YANWEI XUE University of Utah
2
Outline
  • Surface Wave Problem Remedy
  • Theory of Interferometric Filtering
  • 2D Field Data Results
  • 3D Field Data Results
  • Conclusions

3
Solution Filter the surface waves by Non-Linear
Filter (NLF) and interferometric method
4
Outline
  • Surface Wave Problem Remedy
  • Theory of Interferometric Prediction
  • 2D Field Data Results
  • 3D Field Data Results
  • Conclusions

5
Prediction of Surface Waves
6
Basic Strategy
7
Nonlinear Local Filter
8
Outline
  • Surface Wave Problem Remedy
  • Theory of Interferometric Filtering
  • 2D Field Data Results
  • 3D Field Data Results
  • Conclusions

9
Raw Data
10
Remove Surface Waves by NLF
11
Remove Surface Waves by Int.NLF
12
Raw Data
13
Remove Surface Waves by F-K
14
Remove Surface Waves by Int.NLF
15
Surface Waves Predicted by F-K
16
Surface Waves Predicted by Int.NLF
17
Outline
  • Surface Wave Problem Remedy
  • Theory of Interferometric Filtering
  • 2D Field Data Results
  • 3D Field Data Results
  • Conclusions

18
Line 9 Before and After Removal of Surface Waves
19
Line 11 Before and After Removal of Surface Waves
20
Line 13 Before and After Removal of Surface Waves
21
Line 14 Before and After Removal of Surface Waves
22
Outline
  • Surface Wave Problem Remedy
  • Theory of Interferometric Filtering
  • 2D Field Data Results
  • 3D Field Data Results
  • Conclusions

23
Conclusions
  • This approach is effective for surface wave
    removal in both 2D and 3D cases.
  • Advantages
  • Better than FK method for irregular acquisition
    geometry.
  • No need for a near surface velocity model.
  • Limitations
  • Sensitive to the choice of NLF parameters.
  • Parameter selection can be expensive.
  • Future Work
  • Eliminate need for non-linear local filter.
  • More tests on 3D data.

24
Acknowledgement
I thank the sponsors of 2006 UTAM consortium for
their financial support.
25
  • THANKS!
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com