Title: ImageGuided Alignment Verification with Submillimeter Precision for Functional Proton Radiosurgery
1Image-Guided Alignment Verification with
Submillimeter Precision forFunctional Proton
Radiosurgery
- Mahesh Neupane (1), Richard P. Levy(2) , Michael
F. Moyers (2), Keith Schubert (1), Fadi Shihadeh
(1) , and R.W. Schulte (2) - (1) California State University, San Bernardino,
CA - (2) Loma Linda University Medical Center, Loma
Linda, CA
2Introduction
- High-energy proton beams (250 MeV), due to their
exquisitely sharp lateral penumbra with minimal
widening as the beam penetrates the patient, are
suitable for functional radiosurgery procedures
such as pallidotomy.
3Purpose
- Guiding a narrow proton beam with a proton gantry
that weighs about 90 tons to a target with
submillimeter precision requires a sophisticated
alignment verification system. - We have developed a camera and marker-based
system for this purpose and report on its initial
performance in phantom tests.
4Proton Gantry Patient Positioner
- Isocentric gantry, 35 feet tall,90 tons
- 100 MeV 250 MeV protons
- 2 mm isocentric accuracy
- 6-DOF robotic patient positioner
5System Overview
- Three high-resolution CCD cameras (Vicon Motion
Systems, Inc., Oxford, UK) in an equilateral
triangular configuration were focused on a
patient-based marker system (caddy), attached to
the stereotactic halo, and a proton-based marker
system (cross) attached to the proton beam
delivery cone.
6System Components
Marker Caddy
Cone Marker Cross
7System Components
Camera System
Phantom Base
8Experimental Method
Align Simulated target with known stereotatic
coordinates to Simulated beam
Measure residual offset
Calculate beam axis and transform
to stereotactic system
Calculate coordinate transformation
Capture cone and caddy markers
Calculate distance between beam axis
and simulated marker
Correct for residual offset to calculate system
error
9Experimental Setup
- The markers, consisting of 5-mm ceramic balls
covered with retro reflective tape, were the only
structures visible to infrared-light strobed
cameras. - Based on the marker coordinates in the
camera-based coordinate system, coordinate
transformation software was written that computes
the position of the proton beam axis in the
stereotactic system.
Markers
10Phantom Base and Coordinate Transformations
- Two different types of coordinate transforms were
used a geometry-based orthogonal transform and a
least-squares based transform. - The patient was simulated by a phantom base
providing a (non-reflective) ceramic marker
target in 15 discrete positions in stereotactic
space.
Phantom Base
11System Error
- For each performance experiment, the target
marker was aligned to the center of a 1-cm laser
beam emerging from the proton delivery cone to
better than 0.2 mm. - The residual offset between the beam axis and the
target measured by the camera system was
interpreted as the system error.
12Results
- The camera system was able to reproduce
laboratory-inspected distances between the
markers of the two marker systems with a mean
error /- standard deviation (SD) of -0.23 /-
0.33 mm for the caddy and 0.00 /- 0.09 mm for
the cross. - The alignment system error was sensitive to the
type of coordinate transformation used - In a series of 15 independent tests (5 target
positions, 3 tests per position), a
non-orthogonal least squares transform resulted
in an unacceptable mean error (/- SD) of 25 /-
8 mm (range, 14 mm - 36 mm). - On the other hand, an orthogonal transform
preserving geometric distances was associated
with a much smaller error of 0.6 /- 0.3 mm (0.2
mm - 1.6 mm).
13System Error
Orthogonal transformation
Least-squares based transformation
14Conclusion
- An image-guided alignment verification system has
been tested under clinical conditions. - The system error approaches but has not yet
reached the goal limit of less than 0.5 mm. - Various optimization options, e.g., different
marker arrangements, will be applied to achieve
this goal.
15Acknowledgment
- This research was funded by the
- Henry L. Guenther
- Foundation