Title: Patient Safety through Team Training in Healthcare
1Patient Safety through Team Training in Healthcare
- Stephen A. Knych, MD, MBA
- Division Chief, Patient Safety and Quality
- Office 407-303-4607
2On 9/11/01 The World Changed
- We Cannot
-
- Wait for perfect information
- Stay in your stovepipes
- Be complacent again
- Forget about lessons learned
- Debate and delay the issues
- Marginalize solutions
- Dwell on constraints or concerns
3Patient Safety Scope of Problem
- Human Costs
- Estimated as many as 44,000 to 98,000 deaths each
year - More than motor vehicle accidents, breast cancer
and AIDS combined annually - The total number of deaths that would occur if a
747 airplane crashed killing all aboard every
other day for one year! - Source To Err is Human, Institute of Medicine,
1999 - Source Newhouse et.al., Measuring Patient
Safety, 2005
4Patient Safety
- Financial Cost of Medical Errors 29 billion
each year in the United States alone - Doctors, patients, insurers and hospital systems
play a role in eradicating errors
5Patient Safety Scope of the Problem
- 1 out of every 5 people says that they or a
family member experienced a medical mistake - 51 reported the error as serious
- 28-35 of admissions experience an event that
causes HARM ( IHI, Dec 2007, Global Trigger
Tool, Roger, Resar, MD) - Source Commonwealth Fund 2001 Health Care
Quality Survey
6Patient Safety CMS Actions
- Serious preventable eventobject left in place
during surgery - Serious preventable eventair embolism
- Serious preventable eventblood incompatibility
- Catheter-associated urinary tract infections
- Pressure ulcers (decubitus ulcers)
- Vascular catheterassociated infection
- Surgical site infectionmediastinitis after
coronary artery bypass graft surgery - Hospital-acquired injuries fractures,
dislocations, intracranial injuries, burn
7Patient Safety Leadership Role
- Our systems are too complex to expect merely
extraordinary people to perform perfectly 100
percent of the time. We as leaders have a
responsibility to put in place systems to support
safe practice. - .90 X .90 X .90 X .90 .65 or 65
- Law of Composite Reliability
- Leadership Guide to Patient Safety, Institute for
Healthcare Improvement, 2005 - James Conway, former VP and COO of the
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute - Frederick Ryckman, MD, Cincinnati Childrens
Hospital
8Patient Safety Culture
- System of shared values (what is important) and
beliefs (how things work) that interact with a
company's people, organizational structures, and
control systems to produce behavioral norms (the
way we do things around here). - Websters Dictionary online
9Team Training - Why Now?
- Significant performance gaps
- Sentinel Events
- Baldrige requires aligned, systematic and fully
deployed approach - Growing regulatory national expectations
- Patient Experience on Public Web
- Joint Commission Leadership Std 2009
- NQF Safe Practice 1.3 Requirement
- IHI 5 million Lives Campaign
- CMS New Scope of Work
- ACGME and Professional Organizations
10What is the Evidence?
- Teamwork is a key initiative within patient
safety that can transform the culture within
health care - 27 reduction in nurse turnover (Dimeglio, 2005)
- 31 to 4 decrease in clinical error (Morey,
2002) - Communication other teamwork skills are
essential to prevent mitigate medical errors
and harm - 50 Less Adverse Outcomes (Mann 2006)
- 50 Less Post-Op sepsis (Sexton 2006)
11RESULTS OF TEAMWORK IN THE HEALTHCARE ENVIRONMENT
(Sexton, 2006) Johns Hopkins
(Pronovost, 2003) Johns Hopkins Journal of
Critical Care Medicine
(Mann, 2006) Beth Israel Deaconess Medical
Center Contemporary OB/GYN
11
12Believe that decisions of the leader should not
be questioned
Surgeons
Pilots
Sexton, BMJ, 2000
13TEAM FUNCTION SAFETY
- WORST TEAM
- Most experienced surgeon
- Team members changed
- No (de)briefing
- No tracking of results
- No preplanning
- Hierarchical
- Bohmer, R. Harvard Bus.School
- BEST TEAM
- Least Experience Surgeon
- Cohesive Team
- Simulation
- Pre case planning
- Debriefing
- Results tracked
- Removed hierarchy
14High-Performing Teams
- Teams that perform well
- Hold shared mental models
- Have clear roles and responsibilities
- Have clear, valued, and shared vision
- Optimize resources
- Have strong team leadership
- Engage in a regular discipline of feedback
- Develop a strong sense of collective trust and
confidence - Create mechanisms to cooperate and coordinate
- Manage and optimize performance outcomes
- (Salas et al. 2004)
14
15Definition of a Team
- Two (2) or more individuals with specific tasks
that are interdependent who cooperate and
coordinate their activities, able to adapt and
have a shared end goal
16Why TeamSTEPPS
- 5 to 7 years DOD world-wide experience
- Civilian Spread funded by AHRQ
- Master TeamSTEPPS Training Free
- National Network
- All Education Material provided at cost
- Based on Evidence-Based Practices
- Growing national recognition and movement toward
TeamSTEPPS - Florida Hospital joins Pacesetting Hospitals
- UCF-Ed Salas expert mentor and consultant
17Outcomes of Team Performance
- Knowledge
- Shared Mental Model
- Attitudes
- Mutual Trust
- Team Orientation
- Performance
- Adaptability
- Accuracy
- Productivity
- Efficiency
- Safety
18Barriers to Team Effectiveness
TOOLS and STRATEGIES Brief Huddle
Debrief STEP Cross Monitoring Feedback Advocacy
and Assertion Two-Challenge Rule CUS DESC
Script Collaboration SBAR Call-Out Check-Back Hand
off
- OUTCOMES
- Shared Mental Model
- Adaptability
- Team Orientation
- Mutual Trust
- Team Performance
- Patient Safety!!
- BARRIERS
- Inconsistency in Team Membership
- Lack of Time
- Lack of Information Sharing
- Hierarchy
- Defensiveness
- Conventional Thinking
- Complacency
- Varying Communication Styles
- Conflict
- Lack of Coordination and Follow-Up with
Co-Workers - Distractions
- Fatigue
- Workload
- Misinterpretation of Cues
- Lack of Role Clarity
19TeamSTEPPS
20Impact Evaluation
- In FY 08-09, TeamSTEPPS will
- Continue to collect quantitative data for Level 1
and Level 2 - evaluation
- Develop and implement standardized Level 3 4
assessment - tools
- Include sustainment as part of system-wide
evaluation
Level 5 Return on Investment Was the training
worth the cost?
Kirkpatricks Model
Level 4 Results Did the change in behavior
positively affect the organization?
Level 3 Behavior / Training Transfer Did the
participants change their behavior on-the-job
based on what they learned?
Level 2 Learning What skills, knowledge, or
attitudes changed after training? By how much?
- Level 1 Reaction
- Did the participants like the training?
- What do they plan to do with what they learned?
21TeamSTEPPS Pilot/Research Project at Celebration
Health
- Current Status report from the work of the FH
(system, CH, WP) and UCF Research Teams
22Celebration HealthOR Pilot Milestones
- Assessment/Project Charter/Metrics Feb
- Baseline Observations Mar
- Instructor Training Mar
- Coach/Mentor Training- Mar
- Start Project Apr
- On-Going Observations Apr - Dec
- Complete Pilot Project Dec 2008
23Phased Implementation
- Phase 1 (April June)
- OR wheels in to wheels out
- Mon Fri, 730 330 start times
- General Surgery, Orthopedic, Bariatric Surgical
Teams - Phase 2 (July August)
- Disseminate to all surgeons
- 24/7 includes all cases, emergent, weekend,
holiday - Phase 3 (handoffs transitions) (Aug Dec)
- Pre-op to OR
- OR to PACU
24TeamSTEPPS Current Status
- Phase 1 baseline completed
- 3 complete surgical teams trained
- Orthopaedics, Bariatric Surgery, Minimally
Invasive General Surgery teams - 4 hours of Fundamentals Training
- 3 surgeons, 1 PA, 1 First Assist
- 6 nurses and scrub techs
- 18 anesthesiology providers (CRNA/MD)
- 35 CH Council members 1hr Essentials
- FH sent 13 people for 2.5 day Master Trainer
Certification
25TeamSTEPPS Current Status
- Phase 1 baseline completed
- Observations of 30 surgical cases at CH and 30
surgical cases at WP (control group) - Baseline surveys included
- AHRQ Patient Safety Culture Survey
- ORMAQ (assess attitudes towards teamwork and
current perceptions of teamwork) - Stress
- Job satisfaction
- Others
Operating Room Management Attitudes
Questionnaire (ORMAQ)
26TeamSTEPPS Current Status
- TeamSTEPPS training completed - General reactions
were positive
27TeamSTEPPS Current Status
- Trainee comments included
- Better ways to collaborate and facilitate
communication. - Improving communication, decreasing barriers
based upon hierarchy. - Great training - needs to be given to all staff
- mostly surgeons - More interaction and exercise hearing about
it, is way different than performing it. - Did training meet your expectations, why or why
not? - Yes. Good information. Patient safety is our
ultimate goal. It needs to be preserved above
all. - Yes, it actually exceeded my expectations since
practical examples were used throughout.
28TeamSTEPPS Current Status
- What we Learned
- OR team members do find TeamSTEPPS training
helpful and find the concepts viable for their
work. - Simulation or practice is important to training
effectiveness and perceptions of trainees that
they are ready to implement teamwork behaviors
covered in training in the OR. - It is vital the physicians champion training
efforts with their team, their buy-in is crucial
to success.
29TeamSTEPPS Current Status
- Next Steps
- Impact of training on culture, stress, teamwork
perceptions and actual behavior in the OR will be
analyzed in August - Cost Analysis is underway for current Project
- Follow up is scheduled for Oct-Nov 2008. It will
consist of observations and surveys - 2009
- Spread to different location and/or service line?
- Continue evaluation at different location and/or
service line? - Implement simulation as part of future training
roll-out - Implement formalized coaching plan for future
roll-out - Develop a GLITCH database for system-wide use
30Patient Safety
- Knowing is not enough we must apply. Willing is
not enough we must do - Goethe
31QUESTIONS?
- THANK YOU FOR THE INVITATION TO SPEAK TO YOU
TODAY!