Radio-loud AGN energetics with LOFAR - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Radio-loud AGN energetics with LOFAR

Description:

X-ray cavity measurements show energy is available to balance cooling in cluster ... their environments (e.g. Morganti 1988, Killeen et al. 1988, Feretti et al. 1990, ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:24
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 14
Provided by: jude59
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Radio-loud AGN energetics with LOFAR


1
Radio-loud AGN energetics with LOFAR
Judith Croston
LOFAR Surveys Meeting 17/6/09
2
Understanding radio-galaxy physics is important
for galaxy feedback models!
  • X-ray cavity measurements show energy is
    available to balance cooling in cluster cores,
    but timescales uncertain various detection
    biases.
  • When central AGN switches off, up to ¾ of
    available energy still contained within radio
    lobes subsequent evolution of lobe contents
    impact on the cluster depend on cavity particle
    B content.
  • FRIs (typical cluster centre sources) and
    powerful FRIIs have different energetics and
    particle/field content (e.g. JC et al. 2004,
    2005, 2008 Dunn et al. 2004, 2005 Kataoka
    Stawarz 2005) understanding the origins of this
    difference is crucial for relationship between
    accretion mode, jet production and feedback.

JC et al. 2003
Wise et al. 2007
3
Radio-galaxy energetics, particle field
content
  • k is unknown, and in general B and N0 cant be
    disentangled common to assume minimum
    energy/equipartition.
  • The main exception is when inverse-Compton
    emission from the same electron population can be
    detected typically true for FRII radio galaxies
    and quasars.
  • Measurements of external pressure/X-ray cavity
    detections can also constrain ETOT (rule out
    equipartition in FRIs).
  • Emin and shape of N(E) below observable radio
    region are important low-energy electrons
    dominate relativistic particle population.

4
The low-energy electron population
  • Most of the energy density in extragalactic radio
    sources is at energies below currently observable
    radio region.
  • Radio-source properties depend strongly on
    assumed spectrum below 300 MHz alow and gmin.
  • See discussion in Harris (2004, astro-ph/0410485)

Figures from Harris (2004)
5
Inverse-Compton emission from FRII radio lobes
  • IC X-ray emission breaks the ne/B degeneracy of
    radio synchrotron gt direct probe of low-energy
    electron spectrum and of lobe energetics.
  • IC useful in jets hotspots too, but for lobes
    beaming other X-ray emission processes
    unimportant.
  • In most cases CMB photon field dominates over
    nuclear photons (e.g. Brunetti et al. 1997)
    SSC .
  • Can now routinely detect IC emission from the
    lobes of FRII radio galaxies and RL quasars 30
    X-ray detections spanning redshifts of 0.006 2.

Colour XMM IC Contours radio
JC et al. 2004
6
Comastri et al. 2003, Hardcastle et al. 2002,
Brunetti et al. 2002, Isobe et al. 2002,
Hardcastle JC 2005, JC et al. 2004
7
IC/CMB from FRII lobes results for large samples
X-ray detected lobes
  • X-ray detection in at least one lobe in 70 of
    X-ray observed 3C FRIIs
  • Consistent with IC/CMB with B (0.3 1.5) Beq
  • gt 75 of sources at equipartition or slightly
    electron dominated gt magnetic domination must
    occur rarely, if at all.
  • Unlikely that relativistic protons dominate
    source energetics.
  • Total internal energy in FRII radio sources is
    typically within a factor of 2 of minimum energy
    (see also Kataoka Stawarz 2005)
  • But assumptions about the low-energy electron
    population introduce significant uncertainty in
    these results...

Lower limits for non-detected lobes
JC et al. 2005 ApJ 626 733
8
Low-energy electron distribution
  • Assume cut-off frequency, gmin 10
  • in hotspots, gmin 100 1000 required (e.g.
    Carilli et al. 1991)
  • adiabatic expansion gt lower energy electrons in
    lobes
  • Assume spectral index, alow 0.5 (flattening)
  • shock acceleration models predict d 2 2.3 (a
    0.5 0.7)
  • hotspot observations (e.g. Carilli et al. 1991,
    Meisenheimer et al. 1997)
  • If gmin 1000 (instead of 10)
  • Utot and Bobs/Beq unchanged
  • IC/nuclear --
  • conclusions not affected
  • If gmin 1
  • increase in Utot by 25
  • small decrease in Bobs/Beq
  • IC/nuclear
  • If alow aobs
  • increase in Utot of up to factor of 20
  • Bobs/Beq decreases by up to 60,
  • IC/nuclear

9
Spatially resolved IC studies
  • Chandra XMM allow us to investigate spatial
    variation of N(E) and B in lobes.
  • Lack of correlation between radio and X-ray
    structure indicates N(E) changes alone cant
    explain radio structure changes in B alone cant
    explain relation to radio spectral structure gt
    both are required.
  • Also relies heavily on assumptions about low-n
    spectrum...

Isobe et al. 2002
Hardcastle JC 2005
Goodger et al. 2008 in prep.
10
X-ray environments cluster cavities
  • FRI radio lobes at equipartition are
    under-pressured relative to their environments
    (e.g. Morganti 1988, Killeen et al. 1988, Feretti
    et al. 1990, Taylor et al. 1990, Böhringer et al.
    1993, Worrall et al. 1995, Hardcastle et al.
    1998, Worrall Birkinshaw 2000, JC et al. 2003,
    Dunn Fabian 2004, JC et al. 2008, Birzan et al.
    2008)
  • Either radiating particles field are NOT at
    equipartition or some other particle population
    dominates the source energetics.

Dunn Fabian 2004 MNRAS 355 862
Worrall Birkinshaw 2000 ApJ 530 719
11
Combined X-ray radio constraints favour
entrainment of ICM
  • Fraction of energy in radiating particles
    decreases dramatically with distance.
  • These constraints rules out relativistic proton
    domination, electron dominance and simple
    B-dominated models (e.g. Nakamura et al. 2006,
    Diehl et al. 2008)
  • Consistent with entrained, heated ICM dominating
    radio-lobe energetics.
  • Good constraints for models of FRI entrainment,
    but this relies on assumptions about low-energy
    electron population...

3C 31 required entrainment rates
Hydra A missing pressure as a function of
distance
1.4 keV 5 keV 10 keV 50 keV
model (1r/rc) -2.0 (1 r/rc) -1.0 r const.
Comparison with theoretical expectations
JC et al. in prep
12
Calibrating radio-loud (FRI) feedback
  • X-ray cavities provide direct measurement of
    energy input to ICM Ekin gtgt Esynch
  • (e.g. Bîrzan et al. 2004, Dunn Fabian 2004,
    Dunn Fabian 2008)
  • Cavity detection only possible for modest sample
    sizes at low/moderate z and is subject to
    incompleteness problems depends on angle to
    l-o-s, X-ray data quality, cluster luminosity,
    etc.
  • Feedback models require radio surveys of FRIs to
    high z to relate direct measurements of energy
    input to RL AGN population statistics.
  • Low-n radio spectrum promising for reducing large
    scatter in cavity scaling relations (Bîrzan et
    al. 2008)

Bîrzan et al. 2008
13
What LOFAR will do
  • 10-200 MHz observations of large samples of
    radio-loud AGN will determine distributions of
    low-n spectral index ( cut-off in some cases)
    for different radio-loud AGN populations.
  • Low-n spectra for large samples of FRIIs with
    X-ray coverage (100 FRIIs)
  • determine electron energy distribution for the
    energetically dominant population below g 105
    via X-ray IC constraints on particle
    acceleration
  • remove factor 20 uncertainty in ETOT , factor
    2 uncertainty in B assuming CMB dominates IC
    photon seed field in most cases, and uncertainty
    about the role of nuclear IC scattering
  • Low-n spectra for very large samples of FRIs,
    including cavity sources, will
  • Remove gt order of magnitude uncertainty in
    energetics of radiating particles field in
    FRIs/cluster cavities important to determine
    entrainment and heating rates.
  • Allow detailed calibration of AGN heating
    relations via low-n observations of cavity
    samples at low-z
  • Apply new calibrations to comprehensive FRI
    samples for tightly constrained AGN feedback
    models
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com