Title: Common Pitfalls with Accreditation Evaluations
1Common Pitfalls with Accreditation Evaluations
Deacon Carl R. Cramer Ed.D., RKT, ATC/L Professor
and Director Athletic Training Programs Barry
University Miami Shores, Florida
2STEP ONE
- Do not plan a hurricane in the middle of your
site visit.
3Step One Continued
- Read the self-study instructions at least three
times. - Do exactly what it says to do.
- Start Self-Study Process no less than two years
before visit. - Documentation is everything.
- All statements in self-study MUST be supported by
documentation.
4STEP ONE CONTINUED
- Avoid redundancy-no duplicate files-cite pages
- Documents for self-study should be kept as a part
of regular annual program operation, not a panic
preparation to achieve or maintain accreditation.
TEAM EFFORT!!!
5STEP ONE CONTINUED
- Make your compliance with each standard blatantly
obvious. Do not make the team look for proof and
not be able to easily find it. - This is a time for brutal self-honesty. It is
better for you to cite yourself and fix it before
the team gets on-campus than to have them find it
when you have no proof of compliance.
6Most Frequently Seen Problems
- Inconsistency between catalog, website, brochure
and student handbook - No student liability insurance
- No physical exam, HepB Vaccine/TB test
7Most Frequently Seen Problems
- Technical standards not assessed by Medical
Directorchanges in student status not documented - Modalities not all calibrated annually
- No position statements in EAP in ATS Handbook
8Most Frequently Seen Problems
- Syllabi not all included, not revised in years
- Syllabi course description not same as catalog
- No daily/weekly schedule on A.T major courses
- First responder nightmare
9Most Frequently Seen Problems
- Work study conundrums-Double dipping and
supervisionJob description? State federal law? - Program admissions requirements not published in
catalog, website, brochure, handbook
10Most Frequently Seen Problems
- Evaluation of students-What is a 1 or a 3 or a 5?
- What is required to go on to the next level?
- All criteria to be used in considering student
success or failure not in writing and available
to the students
11Most Frequently Seen Problems
- Assessments not specific to level in program
- Technical standards requirement not in catalog,
website, brochure and handbook - ATHLETIC TRAINING
- ATHLETIC TRAINER???
12Most Frequently Seen Problems
- Subject matter not covering all
competencies/proficiencies - Prerequisites not followed or non-existent in
sequence of courses - Content delivery not clearly documented-course
materials
13Most Frequently Seen Problems
- Achievement not documented
- Not enough medical specialty exposure
- Changes not made to improve effectiveness
14Most Frequently Seen Problems
- General medical experience in orthopedic office
- Program director load-released-time low-25
- Inadequate (non-existent) supervision of ATSs
- Not enough faculty/ACIs to teach everything
15Most Frequently Seen Problems
- No goals and objectives for program
- Affiliation agreements inadequate-Liability
- ACIs/CIs Overloaded at job site
- No OSHA annual update/CPR PR not maintained
16Rejoinder
- Againfollow the directions exactly!!!
- Observe page limit
- Less is more but give what is asked for
- As with the self-studywe are planning to or
going to does not count if it relates to a
standardIt must all be in place when the
visitors come or in the rejoinder if cited as NC - Dont be late!!! 30 days is 30 days
17Summary
- Follow the directionsit is your recipe for
success - Dont do it aloneexperts on campus???
- A standard is a standard
- Be clear and be obvious
- Dont make the site visit team guess
- We are all part of a great process to ensure
quality for our studentsthe future of Athletic
Training
18Questions???
- I don't want to overreach myself, but I would
say that this expresses the essence of what I
consider to be my standard at this time. - Pope Benedict XVI
19- THANK YOU
- FOR YOUR INTEREST AND ATTENTION!!!!
- SEATA 2006