Semantics and Complexity of SPARQL By: JORGE PE - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 14
About This Presentation
Title:

Semantics and Complexity of SPARQL By: JORGE PE

Description:

Semantics and Complexity of SPARQL. By: JORGE PE'REZ and MARCELO ARENAS ... H = An expression that indicates how to construct the answer to the query. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:61
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 15
Provided by: nir93
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Semantics and Complexity of SPARQL By: JORGE PE


1
Semantics and Complexity of SPARQLBy JORGE
PEREZ and MARCELO ARENASPontificia Universidad
Cat olica de ChileandCLAUDIO
GUTIERREZUniversidad de ChilePresenterNiral
Zaveri
2
What is SPARQL ?
  • SQL-like query language for RDF.
  • What is RDF.?
  • Resource Description Framework is a data model
    for representing information about World Wide Web
    resources.
  • It represents the information in a Directed
    labeled graph just like an ER-diagram in a
    relational database.
  • SPARQL is essentially a graph-matching query
    language.
  • It has a recommendation of the W3C as of January
    15, 2008.

3
RDF Graph
  • RDF Triple ltsubject, predicate, objectgt

Teachers
name
name
Fred
Joe
knows
t1
t2
43
CS
age
faculty
4
SPARQL Query Syntax
  • Graph-matching query language having form of H ?
    B,
  • where B is the body of the query and H is the
    Head of the query.
  • B A Complex RDF graph pattern expression.
  • H An expression that indicates how to construct
    the answer to the query.

5
SPARQL Query Evaluation
?teacher
Professor
Variables are matched against the input graph
?name
Teachers
title
?faculty
t1
t2
?title unbound
faculty
faculty
name
name
SELECT ?name ?faculty ?title WHERE ?teacher
rdftype Teachers. ?teacher name ?name.
?teacher faculty ?faculty. OPTIONAL
?teacher title ?title.
Joe
Fred
CS
CS
?name ?faculty ?title
Joe CS
Fred CS Professor
6
Complexity of SPARQL
  • In general What is the influence of each
    component of the language in this complexity?
  • How difficult it is to verify whether a given
    mapping is a solution for a pattern evaluated
    over an RDF dataset.

Theorem Operators Complexity
1 AND and FILTER O(P.D)
2 AND,FILTER and UNION NP-complete
3 AND,FILTER and OPT PSPACE-complete
4 AND,UNION and OPT PSPACE-complete
7
Reducing Complexity
  • An important question is whether one can find
    interesting classes of graph patterns,
    constructed by imposing simple and natural
    syntactic restrictions.
  • Managed to lower the complexity of the
    AND-FILTER-UNION fragment by imposing a simple
    normal form.

8
Well-Designed Graph Patterns
  • One of the most delicate issues in the definition
    of a semantics for graph pattern expressions is
    the semantics of the OPT operator.
  • The idea is to allow optional matching of
    patterns.
  • The complexity of evaluating well-designed graph
    pattern expression is lower than in the general
    case.

9
Optimization of Well-Designed Patterns
  • The classical results of optimizing the
    outer-join query are not directly applicable in
    the SPRQL context.
  • In SPARQL, the null-rejecting predicates are
    implicit in the variables that graph patterns
    share and they are never null rejecting.
  • Some specific techniques are needed.
  • Result All AND and FILTER operations are
    executed prior to the execution of the OPT
    operations.

10
Related Work
  • Semantics
  • Two proposals
  • Operational Semantics depth-first traversal
  • Compositional Semantics bottom-up evaluation
  • Cyganiak presents a relational model of SPARQL
  • Harris and Shadbolt presents an implementation of
    a simple fragment of SPARQL in a relational
    database engine.
  • De Bruijn study the semantics of the conjunctive
    fragment of SPARQL

11
Other proposal for RDF query languages
  • Gutierrez discuss the basic issues of the
    semantics and complexity of a conjunctive query
    language for RDF.
  • Haase present a comparison of functionalities of
    pre-SPARQL query languages.
  • Furche presents another in-depth comparison of
    RDF query languages, in terms of their constructs
    and evaluation methods.
  • Several proposals of having an Algebraic query
    language for RDF.

12
Complexity and Optimization
  • Mapping a known query language Q (algebra/SQL)
    into SPARQL graph patterns.
  • There is no complexity study of the fragment of
    relational algebra/SQL.
  • Notion of Join-Tree
  • A possible way to optimize SPARQL queries is to
    map SPARQL graph patterns into relational
    algebra/SQL queries.

13
Conclusion
  • Semantics played a key role.
  • Formalization of a semantics is beneficial.
  • The unlimited use of optional parts in the graph
    patterns could lead to high complexity.
  • Well-designed graph patterns.
  • Provide several rules which may have a
    considerable
  • impact in the cost of evaluating SPARQL queries.

14
Thank You
Questions are invited.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com