Title: Tom Ruckdaschel
1 A Discussion of DCMA Contract Property Management
Presented By Tom Ruckdaschel
703-428-0994 tom.ruckdaschel_at_dcma.mil
2Overview
- Federal Acquisition Regulation Part 42.302,
Contract Administration Functions - (26) Perform Property Administration
- What is Property Administration?
- Regularly reviewing contractor property
management procedures to ensure they meet current
contractual requirements performing oversight of
assigned contractors and completing operational
audits - Property Administration does not involve the
keeping of property records. - Agency responsibility (DoDI 5000.64)
Our mission is to provide Contract Administration
Services to the Department of Defense
Acquisition Enterprise and its partners to ensure
delivery of quality products and services to the
warfighter on time and on cost.
3Contractor Responsibility
- Contractors have stewardship responsibility for
property in their possession and are required to
establish a system to manage (control, use,
preserve, protect, repair and maintain)
Government property in its possession. (Federal
Acquisition Regulations, 52.245-1, Government
Property Clause) - Oversight/surveillance/audit of that system is
conducted by the agency responsible for contract
administration, e.g., DCMA - DCMA oversees the contractor ensuring that the
contractor keeps and maintains records has an
adequate property management system -
Stewardship responsibility The requirement
placed on an individual or organization acting
as the custodian of anothers propertyby
controlling, supervising and managing the
property in their care.
4Oversight Policy Per Current 4161.2-M
- Systems Analysis (Site Visit)
- Large amounts of GP (lt500,000)
- Annual or bi-annual basis (w/3 consecutive years
of goodness) - Limited Analysis (Desk Audit)
- Small amounts of GP (gt500,000)
- Site visits every 3 years
- Problem Rigid and inflexible
- Arbitrary requires oversight based on a
fixed-schedule regardless of true need - Example
- - Good contractors subject to perpetual
review - - Bad contractors not reviewed because its not
their turn - Requires oversight based on how much property
is out there, as opposed to results (how well its
being managed) - This strains limited resources
- Costs exceed benefits
-
5Draft Guideline Under Review
- PAs conduct an annual (once each fiscal year)
written assessment of all assigned contractors to
prioritize the performance of each PMSA/desk
audit - The assessment is be based on past experience
with the contractor, current status of the
contractors property management system and best
information available - Determination will be either
- High (PMSA is required)
- Moderate (PMSA may be required)
- Low (PMSA not required)
-
-
6Summary/Conclusions
- Annual assessments help plan the workload
- This is where I need to spend my time
- High, Moderate, Low criteria help manage the
level or resources targeted - This is how I need to spend my time (Full
systems analysis, desk audit, site visit?) - Criteria is not all inclusive PAs can review
based on special circumstances not addressed in
the criteria - High, Moderate, Low determinations do not mean
Good contractor or Bad contractor - Contractor systems will still be either adequate
or inadequate
7Any Questions?