Network Protocols Designed for Optimizability - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Network Protocols Designed for Optimizability

Description:

Maybe we should design new protocols and mechanisms with ... rather than using only the shortest paths. Leads to polynomial-time optimization problems ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:51
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 16
Provided by: albertgr
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Network Protocols Designed for Optimizability


1
Network Protocols Designed for Optimizability
  • Jennifer Rexford
  • Princeton University
  • http//www.cs.princeton.edu/jrex

2
Measure, Model, and Control
Network Management
Models, tools, scripts, databases
Knobs
Dials
Offered traffic
Topology/ Configuration
Changes to the network
measure
control
Operational network
3
Knobs and Dials
  • Knobs configurable parameters
  • Buffering Random Early Detection parameters
  • Link scheduling weighted fair queuing weights
  • Path selection link weights and routing policies
  • Dials measurement data
  • Traffic link utilization, Netflow records,
  • Performance ping, download times,
  • Routing routing-protocol messages, tables,

Network management read the dials and tune the
knobs
4
Two Directions We Could Go
  • Algorithms for setting knobs based on dials
  • E.g., setting RED parameters based on link load
  • E.g., setting link weights based on traffic
    matrix
  • E.g., setting access-control lists to block
    attacks
  • Designing better knobs and dials
  • Maybe we cant add all that much meaningful
    abstraction on top of what weve got underneath
  • Maybe we should design new protocols and
    mechanisms with optimization in mind
  • Doing well in a class is much easier when you
    get to write the exam. Mung Chiang

5
Problem 1 No Algorithm For Setting the Knobs
  • Random Early Detection (RED)
  • Several tunable parameters
  • Min and max thresholds on queue length, max
    probability, queue weight

Probability
Average Queue Length
6
Problem 1 RED Example Continued
  • Settings have a big influence on performance
  • Good settings can improve the network goodput
  • Bad settings may offer no improvement, or (in
    some cases), worse performance
  • No algorithm for optimizing the parameters
  • Settings based on general guidelines
  • Makes it difficult for operators to enable RED

We need mechanisms that have algorithms for
setting knobs.
7
Problem 2 Poor Dials to Guide Knob Settings
  • Example Random Early Detection
  • Appropriate parameters depend on many factors
  • Number of active flows, flow durations, flow
    RTTs,
  • Not easily measurable today on high-speed links

Probability
Average Queue Length
We need measurements that support network
management.
8
Problem 2 Poor Dials to Guide Knob Settings
  • Example Traffic engineering
  • Depends on knowing the traffic matrix Mij
  • Challenging to measure
  • Resorting to inference of the traffic matrix
  • Aggregating and joining lots of fine-grain data

We need measurements that support network
management.
9
Problem 3 Intractable Optimization Problems
  • Example Traffic engineering
  • Tuning link weights to the prevailing traffic
  • Leads to an NP-hard optimization problem
  • forcing the use of local-search techniques

We need protocols designed with knob optimization
in mind.
10
Problem 4 Non-Linearities in the System
  • Example Hot-potato routing
  • Small change causes a big effect
  • Failure, planned maintenance, or traffic
    engineering
  • Routes to thousands of destinations shift at once
  • causing large shifts in traffic and many BGP
    updates

NYC
SFO
ISP network
11
Dallas
We need protocols that make small reactions to
small changes.
11
Design for Optimizability
  • Creating protocols and mechanisms where
  • We know the algorithms for tuning the knobs
  • We have the measurements the algorithms need
  • The resulting optimization problems are tractable
  • The system does not have non-linearities
  • Example approaches
  • Randomization
  • Increasing the degrees of freedom
  • Logically centralized control

12
Randomization
  • Example traffic engineering
  • Forward traffic in inverse proportion to path
    costs
  • rather than using only the shortest paths
  • Leads to polynomial-time optimization problems

2
1
3
1
3
2
1
5
4
3
13
Increasing Degrees of Freedom
  • Example egress selection
  • Forward traffic to lowest ranked egress point
  • as weighted sum of constant and path cost
  • E.g., keep using SFO even when cost goes to 11
  • Enables integer programming solutions for tuning

NYC
SFO
ISP network
11
Dallas
14
Logically Centralized Control
  • Example Routing Control Platform (RCP)
  • Separate topology discovery from path selection
  • Collect topology and traffic data at servers
  • Apply optimization techniques for selecting
    routes
  • and tell routers what forwarding tables to use

RCP
15
Conclusions
  • Protocols induce optimization problems
  • Read the dials and tune the knobs
  • Controls how the system performs
  • Yet, optimization problems are often hard
  • Lack of predictive models
  • Missing measurement data
  • Computational intractability
  • Non-linearities in the system
  • Design protocols with optimization in mind
  • Randomize, add degrees of freedom, decompose
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com