Space-based detectors - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Space-based detectors

Description:

global anisotropy. of. ultra-high-energy. cosmic rays. Oleg Kalashev, Boris Khrenov, ... not suitable at low distances. LEDA: spectroscopic redshifts ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:35
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 36
Provided by: St268
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Space-based detectors


1
Space-based detectors and global
anisotropy of ultra-high-energy cosmic rays
Oleg Kalashev, Boris Khrenov, Pavel Klimov,
Sergei Sharakin and Sergey Troitsky
2
UHECR studies from space - why? - how? - when?
Global anisotropy patterns - astrophysical
sources - nearby structures seen - distant
sources GZK-suppressed
3
MOTIVATIONS FOR UHECR STUDIES FROM SPACE
(MY PERSONAL VIEW)
  • HUGE EXPOSURE

- the shape of the GZK feature
(tells us about the sources)
- beyond the GZK cutoff (cutoff?zero flux!)
4
MOTIVATIONS FOR UHECR STUDIES FROM SPACE
(MY PERSONAL VIEW)
  • HUGE EXPOSURE

- the shape of the GZK feature
(tells us about the sources)
- beyond the GZK cutoff (cutoff?zero flux!)
AGASA, HiRes, Auger spectra scaled to HiRes
5
MOTIVATIONS FOR UHECR STUDIES FROM SPACE
(MY PERSONAL VIEW)
  • FULL SKY WITH A SINGLE INSTRUMENT

- anisotropy studies
(energy calibration or anisotropy?)
15 energy systematics 30 anisotropy (steeply
falling flux)
Energy calibration or anisotropy? Hard to
distinguish!
energy scale
Glushkov, Pravdin, 2008
latitide
6
MOTIVATIONS FOR UHECR STUDIES FROM SPACE
(MY PERSONAL VIEW)
  • HUGE EXPOSURE

- the shape of the GZK feature
(tells us about the sources)
- beyond the GZK cutoff (cutoff?zero flux!)
  • FULL SKY WITH A SINGLE INSTRUMENT

- anisotropy studies
(energy calibration or anisotropy?)
7
MOTIVATIONS FOR UHECR STUDIES FROM SPACE
(MY PERSONAL VIEW)
  • HUGE EXPOSURE

- the shape of the GZK feature
(tells us about the sources)
- beyond the GZK cutoff (cutoff?zero flux!)
  • FULL SKY WITH A SINGLE INSTRUMENT

- anisotropy studies
(energy calibration or anisotropy?)
  • EASIER TO RAISE FUNDS

- new technologies - space research
8
FLUORESCENT LIGHT FROM AIR SHOWERS SEEN FROM SPACE
9
FLUORESCENT LIGHT FROM AIR SHOWERS SEEN FROM SPACE
One detector covers a large atmosphere area
10
FLUORESCENT LIGHT FROM AIR SHOWERS SEEN FROM SPACE
One detector covers a large atmosphere area
Looking downwards better atmospheric
transparence
11
FLUORESCENT LIGHT FROM AIR SHOWERS SEEN FROM SPACE
One detector covers a large atmosphere area
Looking downwards better atmospheric
transparence Easier determination of the
arrival direction (mono) distance to the
shower known Cherenkov reflected signal
12
FLUORESCENT LIGHT FROM AIR SHOWERS SEEN FROM SPACE
One detector covers a large atmosphere area
Looking downwards better atmospheric
transparence Easier determination of the
arrival direction (mono) distance to the
shower known Cherenkov reflected signal
13
FLUORESCENT LIGHT FROM AIR SHOWERS SEEN FROM SPACE
One detector covers a large atmosphere area
Looking downwards better atmospheric
transparence Easier determination of the
arrival direction (mono) distance to the
shower known Cherenkov reflected signal
- Average background UV light is higher than in
the special regions where the ground FDs
are operating
14
FLUORESCENT LIGHT FROM AIR SHOWERS SEEN FROM SPACE
One detector covers a large atmosphere area
Looking downwards better atmospheric
transparence Easier determination of the
arrival direction (mono) distance to the
shower known Cherenkov reflected signal
- Average background UV light is higher than in
the special regions where the ground FDs
are operating - UV background is changing
on-route of the orbital detector
15
FLUORESCENT LIGHT FROM AIR SHOWERS SEEN FROM SPACE
One detector covers a large atmosphere area
Looking downwards better atmospheric
transparence Easier determination of the
arrival direction (mono) distance to the
shower known Cherenkov reflected signal
- Average background UV light is higher than in
the special regions where the ground FDs
are operating - UV background is changing
on-route of the orbital detector - Signal is
much weaker than in the ground measurements and
the FD design meets new technological
problems. High pixel resolution is needed
16
TUS 2010 (Russia) 6 000 km2sr, Egt7?1019 eV
3000 km2sr (10 resolution) 3000 km2sr (30)
prototype 2005-2007 (!)
JEM-EUSO 2013 (Japan) 120 000 km2sr (0.1)
Egt5?1019 eV
?
KLYPVE gt2010 (Russia) 10 000 km2sr (1 - 4)
3000 km2sr, Egt1019 eV 7000 km2sr, Egt5?1019 eV
?
S-EUSO gt2017 (Europe) 400 000 km2sr (1 - 5)
Egt1019 eV
Note instantaneous apertures multiplied by the
duty factor 0.2 For comparison AGASA 160 km2sr,
Auger 7 000 km2sr
17
ANISOTROPY STUDIES EXAMPLE
Astrophysical sources of cosmic rays (active
galaxies - gamma-ray bursts - interacting
galaxies - galaxy cluster shocks - ) follow the
distribution of galaxies
The distribution of galaxies at the GZK scale is
not isotropic (clusters, superclusters, voids)
Patterns of nearby large-scale structures should
be seen in the distribution of arrival directions
18
EXPECTED COSMIC-RAY FLUX
l,b - Galactic coordinates
1. Construct the source density function
n(l,b,r) - take a complete catalog of galaxies -
count numbers in bins - smooth 2. Construct the
propagation function f(r,Emin) - fraction of
surviving hadrons with energy EgtEmin at
distance r from the source - energy losses (GZK
etc.) 3. Convolve the two functions to get the
expected flux
r - distance
E - energy
F(l,b)??dr n(l,b,r) f(r,Emin)/r2
EXPECTED FLUX of HADRONS with EgtEmin from the
DIRECTION (l,b)
19
THE SOURCE DENSITY FUNCTION
requires a complete catalog of galaxies
previous studies PSCz catalog (IRAS)
this study XSC catalog (2MASS) HYPERLEDA
database
  • IRAS angular resolution ? arcmin
  • 2MASS angular resolution lt arcsec
  • LEDA angular resolution ? arcsec

poor angular resolution IRAS did not resolve
galaxies in dense clusters systematic undercounts
in density
20
THE NEARBY UNIVERSE SEEN BY 2MASS
Jarrett et al. 2004
colour distance
21
THE NEARBY UNIVERSE SEEN BY 2MASS
Jarrett et al. 2004
22
2MASS photometric redshifts
  • complete sample for b gt5?, r lt270 Mpc
  • accuracy 20 for average distances
  • not suitable at low distances

30lt r lt 270 Mpc 2MASS XSC
30lt r lt 50 Mpc calibration
LEDA spectroscopic redshifts
  • complete sample for b gt15?, r lt50 Mpc
  • Hubble flow distances
  • suitable at low distances

0lt r lt 30 Mpc LEDA
COMPLETE SAMPLE for b gt15?, r lt270 Mpc
23
COMPLETE SAMPLE for b gt15?, r lt270 Mpc
24
Flux suppression with distance
code by Oleg Kalashev
25
EXPECTED FLUX (EUSO)
Egt5.6?1019 eV protons Galactic coordinates 3 deg
smoothing
26
EXPECTED FLUX (TUS)
Egt7?1019 eV protons Galactic coordinates 10 deg
smoothing
27
SUPERGALACTIC PLANE (TUS)
Egt7?1019 eV protons 30 events in the full-sky
sample for 95 CL evidence/exclusion
28
APPLICATION FOR TERRESTRIAL EXPERIMENTS
Yakutsk
AGASA
HiRes
Auger
Egt5.6?1019 eV protons, Supergalactic coordinates
29
APPLICATION FOR TERRESTRIAL EXPERIMENTS
Yakutsk
AGASA
HiRes
Auger
Egt5.6?1019 eV protons, Supergalactic coordinates
(data)
30
  • UHECR studies from space
  • - important
  • shape of the spectrum at and beyond GZK
  • full-sky anisotropy
  • new techniques
  • - started in 2005 with the TUS prototype (Russia)
  • - will continue with TUS (2010), JEM-EUSO (2012),
  • KLYPVE (gt2010?), S-EUSO (gt2017?)

Example of an anisotropy task - astrophysical
sources in nearby large-scale structures in
the Universe - can be firmly tested already with
TUS
31
THANK YOU!
32
(No Transcript)
33
(No Transcript)
34
Kachelrieß, Parizot, Semikoz 2007
35
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com