Title: Effective Fraud Prevention and Security Controls
1Effective Fraud Prevention and Security Controls
DOD Managers Internal Control Program
(MICP) November 23, 2009 Cindy Brown Barnes,
Assistant Director, FSI
2Discussion Agenda
- FSI Background
- Video FSI Work
- FSI Methodology
- Case Study Discussion
- Questions
3FSI BackgroundWho We Are
- The Forensic Audits and Special Investigations
(FSI) unit was formed in May 2005 to bring GAOs
related anti-fraud and other investigative
activities together in one organization. - In addition to analysts, forensic auditors, and
criminal investigators, FSI staffing includes - data mining and systems integration experts,
- fraud hotline analysts, and
- quality control staff such as communications
analysts. - All permanent FSI staff are Certified Fraud
Examiners (CFE).
4FSI BackgroundWhat We Do
- FSI work addresses
- fiscal challenges facing our nation,
- organizational and individual ethics,
- stewardship over government resources,
- control environment at federal agencies, and
- issues related to homeland and national security.
- FSI work comes from a variety of sources
- congressional requests and proposals,
- internal research and development, and
- hotline tips.
-
5FSI BackgroundWhat We Do
- FSI has governmentwide jurisdiction and has
access to most government data including tax
records, SSA data, and grants and disbursement
data, including Medicare/Medicaid data. - FSI has access to law enforcement tools such as
the National Criminal Information Center (NCIC),
Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FINCEN),
and Lexis-Nexis law enforcement. - FSI also manages FraudNet, the governmentwide
hotline to report fraud, waste, and abuse. - FSI has offices in Washington, D.C., and Dallas,
Texas. -
6Video FSI Work
- Video highlights of FSI work
7Effective Fraud Prevention Controls
- Internal controls are intended to provide
reasonable assurance, not absolute assurance. - Tone at the top and supportive culture are
critical to success. - Effective internal control systems include
elements of - human capital,
- policies and processes, and
- automated and integrated systems.
- Management efforts should be focused on
prevention - controls in place before money is disbursed.
- Data mining is an effective tool for both
auditors and management.
8Fraud Prevention Program Model
9Effective Security Controls
- Standards for security are different than the
reasonable assurance for fraud prevention. - Effective security controls combine elements of
- People who are properly trained
- Technology that is capable of countering the
threat, and - Processes that make best use of people and
technology. - Red team or covert tests are an effective tool
for both investigators and management. - Tone at the top is critical to success.
10FSI MethodologyTechniques and Tools
- Audit steps
- Data matching
- Data mining
- Statistical sampling
- Internal controls evaluation
- Investigative steps
- Undercover tests
- Social engineering
- Coordination with IGs or other law enforcement
agencies - NCIC, FINCEN, Lexis Nexis law enforcement
Integration
- Combined forensic audit and investigation
- Concludes on broken controls
- Substantiates specific fraud cases and/or
provides first-hand evidence of fraud - Where possible identifies magnitude
11FSI MethodologyUndercover Testing
- FSI also has the authority to perform undercover
tests of programs or processes to identify
vulnerabilities. - Undercover tests are performed by criminal
investigators as red team exercises (e.g. no
agency notification). - Tests allow FSI to gather first-hand knowledge of
control breakdowns and vulnerabilities in a
realistic setting, rather than rely on the
representations of the tested entity. - Analyst/auditors help interpret the results of
the undercover tests in a broader context and
provide planning input.
12FSI MethodologyCase Studies
- Case studies help illustrate the details and
impact of fraud in concrete terms to Congress and
taxpayers. - Criminal investigators are critical to developing
cases - Access to law enforcement databases and resources
- Professional interviewing skills
- Contacts in other federal agencies and IGs.
- FSI frequently refers case studies to the
appropriate law enforcement agency or other
entity for further investigation.
13FSI Case Studies
- Fraud, Waste, and Abuse
- Governmentwide purchase cards
- Transit benefit fraud
- HUBZone program fraud
14FSI Case Study 1Governmentwide Purchase Cards
- Federal employees committing fraud with their
government purchase cards - Statistical samples to test effectiveness of
controls - Investigative work for highly pilferable items
- Data mined using criteria such as prohibited
goods or services or items likely to be for
personal use (e.g, internet dating) - Could not determine magnitude of fraud
governmentwide -
15FSI Case Study 1Governmentwide Purchase Cards
- Findings
- Estimated that nearly 41 percent of all federal
purchase card transactions from July 1, 2005,
through June 30, 2006, failed basic internal
control checks - Agencies were unable to locate 458 of 1,058
accountable and pilferable items totaling over
2.7 million - Case studies of fraudulent purchases included
- USDA employee embezzled 642,000 over 6 years for
gambling, car and mortgage payments, and retail
purchases - U.S. Postal Service employee spent 1,100 on
Internet dating services over a 15-month period - Waste, abuse, and questionable purchases also
identified
16FSI Case Study 2Transit Benefit Fraud
- Federal employees fraudulently receiving and/or
selling their subsidized transit benefits - Undercover operation using both eBay and
Craigslist to identify sellers and arrange
purchases - Data mined transit benefit records from selected
federal agencies and performed additional
investigation such as - Comparing employee home and work addresses
- Obtaining agency records
- Interviewing employees
17FSI Case Study 2Transit Benefit Fraud
Metrochek Warning
18FSI Case Study 2Transit Benefit Fraud
- Findings
- Over 3 days, found at least 20 federal employees
fraudulently selling benefits on eBay - Data mining revealed additional fraud, including
- People who continued to obtain benefits even
after leaving the federal government - Numerous cases of federal employees inflating
their commuting costs - One Treasury employee drove to work, parked for
free in agency parking, and collected the maximum
105 per month in benefits (he sold them on eBay)
19FSI Case Study 2Transit Benefit Fraud
- Findings (cont.)
- Estimated that potential fraud during 2006 in the
National Capital Region was at least 17 million
and likely more - OMB tightened controls over the entire program
- One Department of State employee was fired
- Wages were garnished from a Commerce employee
- Transportation employees were suspended from duty
without pay and suspended from the program - A Treasury employee was forced to repay 3,020
- An IRS employee was convicted of theft of
government computers and sentenced to jail time
20FSI Case Study 2Transit Benefit Fraud
Undercover Buy
21FSI Case Study 3HUBZone Fraud
- Findings
- Identified 29 case studies of firms that did not
meet principal office requirements, employee
residency requirements, or both - Fraud in the D.C. metro area and beyond,
including the states of Texas, Alabama, and
California - Some firms were located at known virtual office
sites, a clear indication of fraud - Undercover operation showed SBA lacked front-end
controls over the program
22FSI Case Study 3HUBZone Fraud Supposed
Principal Office
23FSI Case Study 3HUBZone Fraud Actual
Principal Office
24FSI Case Study 3HUBZone Fraud SBA Letter to
Bogus GAO Firm
25FSI Case Study 3HUBZone Fraud Headquarters
for Bogus GAO Firm
26Summary of Key Points
- There are significant benefits to establishing
and maintaining an integrated team of auditors
and investigators. - Forensic audits are an effective tool for
auditors, analysts, and investigators to
proactively identify fraud, waste, and abuse. - There are some cultural challenges to bringing
together diverse staff, but a unified mission,
clear goals, and common language (e.g., the CFE
designation) helps to bridge the gap.
27Question and Answer Period